I'm a sucker for well put together outfits, bimut no definitely not more intimate. Kissing and sex will always be more "intimate ". Clothed dancing just look visually better.
Mnaz provides a great insight. It’s surprisingly insightful for this site.
No! A clothed dance is never as intimate as being nude and inside of a dancer during a lapper! I’m not sure what planet you are from - but you guys are lost!
Yes it can. Reasons could be because that some women aren't good at sex, or they are somewhat sexually repressed, unadventurous, pillow princess. Also, like DC said, some things like doggy just feel distant.
This thread has gone to a crazy place way fast. Fun facts. Women can turn their heads because they have necks. There are also things called mirrors that allow eye contact when one person is facing away from the other. Eye contact can also be maintained during a blowjob. If a girl has her eyes closed tightly and is gumming your cock, or looks like she's sucking a lemon, she's bad at them. If you're a victim of bad blowjobs don't despair, there are plenty of opportunities to turn your luck around.
No intimacy in business transactions? No, but I am (partially) PAYING FOR THE ILLUSION OF INTIMACY.
So, to answer the original question, yes, sometimes, if the lapper is done well or the sex poorly. If the sex is not very intimate, performed poorly, etc., then a great lap-dance which is done well, has a high degree of interpersonal phenomenon going on, can certainly be better. Kind of like asking whether your lightest darks should be darker than your darkest lights. Sure, in context, but who cares? Because if they aren't, you just redefined darks and lights ...
Great analogy phat boy, an RIL is like a bitch with a fake louie bag. I don’t see anything wrong with a fake louie bag though, as long as you always remember it’s a bought and paid for sex worker and the intimacy you feel from her, she doesn’t feel anything even vaguely of the same sort.
Mnaz, but the problem is when you get words like intimacy thrown around, it connotes a shared experience. You don't get that from a hoe.
I remember years ago when a relationship I was in ended, so I got drunk and decided to hit up one of the neighborhood hoes. And she wouldn't do it. She told me I was too good of a guy to pay for it. That it would feel good but just for a bit coz there's nothing there, that its no substitute for love or something. We just talked and drank some more. That really impacted the way I feel about buying sex.
24 comments
SJG
No! A clothed dance is never as intimate as being nude and inside of a dancer during a lapper! I’m not sure what planet you are from - but you guys are lost!
Which one of you geniuses followed a dancer to her car after her shift?
Yeah - you know about emotions and women!!!
I admit it - I’m an emotional fool - but you dudes take it to a new low....
I also posted a similar question a couple months ago https://www.tuscl.net/discussion.php5?id…
So, to answer the original question, yes, sometimes, if the lapper is done well or the sex poorly. If the sex is not very intimate, performed poorly, etc., then a great lap-dance which is done well, has a high degree of interpersonal phenomenon going on, can certainly be better. Kind of like asking whether your lightest darks should be darker than your darkest lights. Sure, in context, but who cares? Because if they aren't, you just redefined darks and lights ...
I remember years ago when a relationship I was in ended, so I got drunk and decided to hit up one of the neighborhood hoes. And she wouldn't do it. She told me I was too good of a guy to pay for it. That it would feel good but just for a bit coz there's nothing there, that its no substitute for love or something. We just talked and drank some more. That really impacted the way I feel about buying sex.