Trash Reviews
goosman
On A Booty Hunt
It appears that the number of trash/uninformative reviews, with no details, possibly fake, or vague recollections from a visit two years ago, just to get access to VIP, is on the rise. I know its a fine line, between what constitutes a short but informative review, and a trash review, but I wish there was some kickback on those razor thin to make them give more details for VIP access.
You write down three lines of vague details about what your friend told you about the club on his visit three years ago, and that opens up access to Papi Chulo's Encyclopedia Striptanica? Doesn't seem like a fair deal to me.
You write down three lines of vague details about what your friend told you about the club on his visit three years ago, and that opens up access to Papi Chulo's Encyclopedia Striptanica? Doesn't seem like a fair deal to me.
11 comments
I don't care so much about the submitter getting VIP, but I find it distracting to have to fish through so many shit reviews to find any substance
Since flag function isn't widely used (or, if used, doesn't make it online), Founder should consider dropping "Flag" function and changing description from "Props" to "Comments". Then, all comments, either positive or negative, would appear in one place.