She's a 9 (or an 8.5) and she would tone up that ass if she danced.
I don't give out 10s. Those [10s] are airbrushed and photoshopped/manipulated photographs. So 9 is my highest rating. Take that how you will.
All of the face & cleavage shots make her look like a 9+. But then, once I saw the rest of her, that number went down. Ass is too big. And, honestly, maybe it's just 'cuz I'm young and naturally thin myself, but her boobs are also a little too big... and probably fake. I like 'em natural.
So, for all that... 7.5. Her face is fucking gorgeous.
Emily Sears:
Australian, born 1985, 5' 8", 32D- 24 - 35
I would give her an 8.5, because
(a) the boobs are fake
(b) I almost never give a 10 and
(c) I prefer this other blonde fake-titted Australian glamour model, also named Emily S:
Emily Scott:
Australian, born 1983, 5' 9", 34D - 24 - 34
for whom it is *easy* to find topless photos, unlike for Emily Sears.
Here, for example, are 100+ sexy pics of Emily Scott, many of them showing her bountiful bare bosom:
[view link]
Emily Scott gets a 9.5!
10.
It looks like I'm the only one to rate her a 10 so far. She's not one of the hottest girls I've ever seen but she's hot enough to be a 10 on my book.
Vince, to quote myself: "I prefer this other blonde fake-titted Australian glamour model, also named Emily S".
Implication: Both Emily Sears and Emily Scott have had boob jobs.
34 comments