Founder BAN SJG
ime
Fuck Joe Biden
in this thread SJG talks about premeditated rape of sleeping women
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=3…
Get this scumbag the fuck off of here. Extras are one thing but raping women in their sleep and holding onto there wrists when the awaken startled (because they are being raped) is another. Fuck I thought he was just a weird but he is a fucking scumbag.
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=3…
Get this scumbag the fuck off of here. Extras are one thing but raping women in their sleep and holding onto there wrists when the awaken startled (because they are being raped) is another. Fuck I thought he was just a weird but he is a fucking scumbag.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
40 comments
Fucking women without their consent is rape, pure and simple and cowardly. Reminds me too much of a thread Player11 posted in, where a buddy of his would drug dancers and rape them bareback in the VIP, then brag to Player about the trail of knocked-up strippers he left behind.
These clowns need to get thrown in jail.
Maybe what he said can reasonably be understood in two different ways. Nobody has ever accused SJG of being a role model when it comes to clarity of the written word. But I did not and still don't interpret it as anything like rape.
Yeah. That's fucked up.
I've NEVER had to hold a girl down. The girls come on to me and want me, not the other way around.
That's seriously fucked up. Not cool.
In any event I'm done debating and defending SJG (unless of course he wants to start paying my hourly rate for a continued defense). Dougster can jump in now if he wants to.
I read the comments on this thread b/f reading what SJG had written; so I was not sure what the exact circumstances were – as far as I'm concerned all is fair b/w lovers.
But penetrating her and holding down her wrists while she is asleep is a bit much and I doubt most women would find that desirable – and he himself admits it's kinda creepy when he expects them to wake up startled.
Before reading his comment – I thought it may have been something along the lines of for example when a chick starts giving you a BBBJ while you are sleeping and then you wake up and “wow what a feeling” - so maybe if it was something along those lines (i.e. you going down on her while she is sleeping and she waking up to that) that may not be too bad; but penetrating/fucking her while she's asleep is a bit much.
her lips said no but her eyes said yes? something like that?
Agreed! If something went down exactly as described in san_jose_guy's post it is seriously non-brilliant!
However, san_jose_guy has never struck me as an advocate of rape or even a misogynist and he is an oddball! So I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt!
san_jose_guy you're not actually advocating fucking women without having consent are you?
No consent = rape = criminal act = seriously non-brilliant!
SJG's story is somewhat different because he's a stranger to them and it is scary for women to be forced to do anything sexual. I'm not defending his behavior, but rather saying circumstances are everything. I think the liberal PC age we live in has confused sexual relations beyond all common sense.
But otherwise, its creepy
wasn’t there another sick twisted sexual predator on TUSCL some years back that got deleted after some real life shit?
i doubt any of his victims would find it very amusing
violets are blue
san_jose_guy is a psycho rapist nut job
and now he wants to be bat shit crazy female too
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=3…
SJG
But I have had good experiences making second entries with women while they sleep, and then letting them awaken. This is not fiction.
I wouldn't do it unless I knew it was okay, and that she was sleeping because that was what she was waiting for.
They always awaken right away. Not actually intending to engage in any thrusting with them while they sleep.
The point is just to enter them, and then let them awaken.
Some of the regular TUSCL posters must have very little experience with civilian GF's. Otherwise they would not find this strange.
My original inspiration for this comes from Margaret Attwood's largely autobiographical novel "Cat's Eye".
I have had some who have made it clear that when they are with me they want me to fuck them as many times as possible. It is just there way of trying to advance the relationship, by giving of themselves 100%.
I regret that it was not one of these that I ended up knowing long term.
This is not fiction. :)
SJG
https://sites.google.com/site/sjgportal/…
Humble Pie, Catfish Blues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ryf08xeP…
It's never OK to penetrate anybody without their consent. Someone that is asleep cannot consent. Since you're a guy, it's like if you were asleep and were woken up by something entering your butthole. Not cool.
Being awaken by a blow job is totally different and OK with me, lol.
In Margaret Attwood's largely autobiographical novel "Cat's Eye", the 22yo protagonist has been taken to the home of her 50ish Studio Art Professor, and they are getting ready to sleep. He tells her not wear something she is starting to put on. I think it was under panties.
He explains himself, "Sometimes I might enter you without first waking you."
In the novel the character shows no objection to this, and she complies with his request.
When I have done it in real life, it always goes over real well, at that time, and in the morning too.
When I have teasingly suggested such, phrasing it just like above, at our local strip clubs, it always gets a good reaction. Same at AMPs too.
There is a degree of Submission and Dominance play in all human relations, especially the sexual.
SJG
https://sites.google.com/site/sjgportal/
John Mayall
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKcmDCPC…
LOL. This thread is at least a triple bump. I didn't bother to open the link that was bumped.
This is likely the only forum to allow a guy like SJG to participate.
What he describes has a high likelihood of being classified as rape unless the woman explicitly tells you that she enjoys and wants this type of sexual play. Previous consensual sex does not imply consent to sexual contact while a person is asleep or unconscious.
Anyone who has doubts can test this in court... see how that works out for you.
If nothing else, it's creepy as fuck. This should surprise no one.