Which would you prefer 50 lbs over weight or 50 lbs under weight.

No one can be 50 pounds underweight unless they were on Naked & Afraid or live in Ethiopia.

Oh, I don't mind the chubby chicks for dating material. I have much higher standards for dancers and the like.

rockstar666 - According to the charts the ideal weight for a 5'11" woman is 155 lbs. My skinny as a bean pole cock sucker was 5'11' and 105lbs. I think the drugs played a part in that.

50lbs is really pushing the needle, but I'd take that over the anorexic. .. hoping all the weight is in their tits :)

There's a huge difference between delightfully plump with a nice face and smile and the methamphetamine sunken eye look.
I usually won't give any attention to an even remotely overweight girl at a club, but there have been a few so skinny that i'll feign interest in talking to a porker just to avoid having the cachexic sit down next to me.
in my dating experience I have only gone for skinny to healthy normal. But there have been two lapses of judgement when Ive hooked up with a plump girl and from my limited experience I find what they say about fat girls and bjs generally true.

50 over – more cushin for the pushing.

I like big tits and big asses and at least w/ the 50-over gal I’ll have something to play with which would not be the case with the 50-under ironing-board.

50? Overweight. I may be off slightly, but I believe a healthy average weight is 130ish.

80 pounds would be on death's door. 180 is heavy but sometimes workable.

Now, if you cut that to 25 pounds the choice is tougher. I'd probably still take the heavier girl, but I know my tastes lean slightly curvier than some.

I definitely go with the 50 pounds over girl. It's not only the more cushion for pushin thing, more of them are just fun to be around. I don't necessarily find fat strippers sexy, but I do find them entertaining. Skinny girls don't do that much for me.

I'll go with the over weight.

If they are equally pretty I vote overweight assuming that she's got big tits. If she's fat with smaller tits then I'll go with the anorexic one.

I like my girl thick, so I would take the overweight woman.

I'm going over, for pretty much the same reasons everyone else mentioned. Prescribed weights tend to skew low anyway, so that makes the upper limit that much more acceptable.

It also depends on the build of a person – e.g. a 240 lb linebacker may be considered way overweight by the charts but the dude could have single digits body-fat.

I’ve met tall and thick black dancers that are def big boned and often muscularly dense and would not surprise me if they were in the 160 to 175 lb range – and they were big in the right places and not necessarily fat (i.e. big tits; wide hips; big asses; thick legs; and not necessarily a bit gut).

Depends on a lot of factors. If the MILF weighed 50 lbs less, she'd be anorexic, and she's near median for her height. A girl I knew in Kansas City, also median for her much greater height, could swallow 50 lbs without having it show very much at all.

As others have said though, "pretty" counts for more than weight, and personality counts for at least as much as pretty.

No contest. The heavier chick.

Last year there was a dancer in my favorite club that had an absolutely gorgeous face. Very close to a 9.5. But she was so skinny her body was almost grotesque. No ass. Ribs sticking out. No way I wanted to be near that.

Big Dick or Skinny Girl? or a Combination of Both?

http://www.heavy-r.com/video/137363/Long…

I really do not like fat girls. But honey/skinny girls are even worse...IMO.

if this is a choice between anoxic and almost dead or just a lot more overweight than I prefer, I would choose overweight.

anorexic, autocorrect did it again.

If the woman's six and a half feet tall or better, fifty pounds more or less wouldn't matter. But if she's average height, fifty pounds more or less is undesirable.

Over. Didn't even have to think about it

Under

Over. If I want to see a skeletal system, I'll go to a haunted house.

Since sc didn't make a choice between the two mandatory, I'll go with neither. Now if I HAD to choose I'll take the over. A better match with me and I hate bones sticking out!

I'll take the 5' 105lbs spinner any day

I don't fuck with big girls either, so I'd probably go for the under. I think 50lbs under might be unattractive as well, 5'11" 105 seems a bit too far. I know for damn sure I want no part of 5'11" 205 though.

I like em skinny, but I'd have to see what that much skinny looks like. I don't have to see 50 lbs. overweight to know I wouldn't want that, no way no how.

5'11"??? Tell me WHERE!!!! How many of you know a 5'11" stripper (not including the heels).
When measuring height to determine healthy body weight, they have to take the stripper heels off and stand on the floor.
I'd bet at most clubs I've been to the average is 5'4" (maybe shorter), about 120, maybe 130 is "fit", and if they're 50 pounds underweight (70 pounds?) they've hopefully been checked into a hospital.
I like them thin. When I see a girl with a string bikini, and the string across the front is stretched from hip to hip without touching her stomach, I start getting fixated on it. But, that's probably going to happen on a girl that's 5'4" and 110 in very nice shape, it she's 5'4" and 60 pounds, that's rather grotesque.

I've known a couple of dancers who were pretty tall. One was at BJ's in the Twin Cities -- 5'11" blonde, blue-eyed Nordic goddess. (Yeah, even though I'm an atheist, I'm drop down and pray to her.) Another was at Schiek's, again in the Twin Cities, back in the '90s. I came up to about her chin (or a little higher) when she was in heels; nuts, from what I understand, she was even in a tall-girl issue of Playboy.