Was watching some show on tv and it just occurred to me that I don't understand the concept of a mistress. As in a lasting sexual relationship with someone you're not married to, while married.
Don't get me wrong, I understand the need of men to have an actual lasting relationship, and I understand the need for some men to have extra marital activities. But if the former, wouldn't marriage already fulfill that? And, if the latter, wouldn't it be more efficient and diverse to just spend the money on OTC and ITC activities?
Same thing applies to the Sugar Daddy relationship. Why not, just get married or just play the field?
I guess, maybe it's for men who want a permanent relationship but not get married, or just not with the person they're currently married to. But if the latter, why not get divorced? And, it doesn't explain some men who have mistresses that don't actually want to get divorced.
I guess I just can't relate and am confused.
Insights welcome....


For simplicity, I'm going to treat mistress, sugar daddy, and long term otc relationship as basically the same thing and call them having a mistress.
The reason you have a mistress while married is because your wife gets old, ugly, fat, and becomes a sexual slug. A mistress does what your wife is supposed to do but won't. The wife didn't start out this way which is why you married her in the first place, but that is what she has become.
The reasons vary for why you don't divorce the slug even though you have the mistress, but usually they involve the loss of money that a divorce would involve, or other relationships like kids that would be damaged by divorce.
As for why not play the field (ITC, otc with different girls, etc) instead of a mistress, the two things are not necessarily mutually exclusive. I have a DS that I see every week, but I also visit clubs and occasionally do otc with other dancers. I like variety, so although the DS gets most of my time and attention, I don't put all my eggs in one basket. However, the reason I stick with the DS is because she is the most awesome dancer I've ever known and she gives me a much better experience than any dancer ever. Why would I not stick with a gorgeous young woman who fulfills my every sexual fantasy more than I ever thought possible? Why would I want tons of variety when she is everything I want? Plus variety takes time, and you often strike out or spend a bunch of money on a dud. A mistress eliminates those risks and provides a consistently satisfying experience.
Seems pretty simple to me. Unless of course the DS is all in my head. If that's the case, then I must be in some sort of psychotic freak so don't listen to me.