One of the interesting delineations I'm seeing a lot here is those who prefer the smaller-town places versus those who are fans of the more Vegas-style clubs you see in the bigger cities. Seems like folks who are used to one don't really care for the other and vice versa.
The sense I get:
THE TOWNIE BAR -Smaller -Not as fancy (or clean) -Girls aren't as likely to be good looking or great dancers -Girls are probably entirely natural -Cheaper -Likelier to get better service if you're a regular -Less likely to get good service if it's your first or second time, or if you're "not from around" -Supervision might be lax -Extras/ITC may be more likely and, as such, OTC isn't really as big of a deal unless there's a motel nearby
THE CITY CLUB -Bigger, often huge -Fancier, perhaps opulently so -Hot talent, perhaps shipped in from elsewhere -From extensions to implants, good chance these girls aren't entirely made of stock parts -Prices can be ridiculous -Regulars might get slightly better service, but not if they get a rep for being cheap -First-timers and out-of-towners could be big shots, so they often get the best service -Big staff of bouncers who are pretty vigilant (except in certain cities) and cameras to watch what goes on -Extras/ITC unlikely (except in certain cities), OTC more likely if you're from out-of-town and staying someplace nice
It's interesting to see the occasional review from the "fish out of water" -- someone used to one, but at the other. Those used to the townie bars generally seem turned off by the sticker shock at the bigger places while also calling them some variation of "impersonal." The city folk, though, will talk about the dirt on the floor and the lack of inspiring talent at the townie bars.
Of course, there are variations on these themes (the small-city club that aspires to be a city club but is really more of a fancy townie bar, the AA city club that's a little more gritty, etc.), but I do feel like a lot of us prefer one of these two categories over the other.

