Cataloging?

So you basically want like TER but for individual dancers? There's many practical problems with that... starting with the fact that many dancers value their privacy and your discretion as much you do yours. The information you're looking for can be extracted from this site but painstakingly and via DM.

Add that dancers change names regularly, they come and go, work different clubs, travel dance. The design of this site would have to completely change if reviews were by dancer and I think the information quality here would plummet as a result.

used to be a such a site for the Los Angeles area called 'Boned in'. Most people had the general information available and if you proved your worth you could have special access to the x-rated stuff.

Probably not a good idea. Not to mention it would be an unmanageable task to maintain and keep accurate. Also I think the uncertainty of the experience is part of the fun, especially when the super hot stripper who you expect is going to be a GPS delivers like a pornstar wannabe.

Also I think the uncertainty of the experience is part of the fun, especially when the super hot stripper who you expect is going to be a GPS delivers like a pornstar wannabe.

This is a great point @iknowbetter. Detailed dancer-level intel would ruin part of the fun for me at the club, I think. TUSCL should give me enough information that I show up at the right club at the right time but choosing who I spend time with is part of the adventure.

I'm gonna set aside any ethical/moral issues with dancer privacy and the like, as evidence suggests there is a wide range of opinions on what is right and wrong among the active participants in discussions here.

I'm questioning the value of such an effort. I've chatted in DM's with a few members on such topics and my conclusion is that experiences vary wildly with the same girls. That's between two well intentioned members. I shudder to think what the trolls intentionally spreading misinformation, being disruptive for their own entertainment, or having genuine mental health issues what do to pollute the data. Perhaps with a large enough sample size, you may be able to glean some tendencies from the noise, but I think the data would be suspect at best.

I also don't think you can discount the name-change, club swapping, travel dancer influence on data quality in that model. Perhaps that's variable by area, but around here the same girl dances by the name Lexus at one club, Mercedes at the next, and then travels in the summer and dances as Bubbles and Sparkles at two other clubs and returns in the winter as Cashmere and Silk at the first two clubs. What makes it more complex is she may also have very different menu's and prices at each club.

IMO, I strongly prefer the club-oriented approach over the dancer centric one. I wouldn't object to the site having the dancer centric area, I just wouldn't participate in it. I wouldn't trust the data, I don't see the value, and its personally not in alignment with my personal choice to not kiss-n-tell.

What makes it more complex is she may also have very different menu's and prices at each club.

Another great point. A dancer I've seen at flight club also travels to NYC and Vegas from time to time. But if you read my review of her at flight, and then went to see her at Rick's in NYC, you're setting yourself up for a bad time.

Many excellent points have been made here on why maintaining a catalog of “Is so and so a good time?” is not a great way to look at the value of this site.

In other discussions of this type, we have had to remind newbies that just because a dancer once provided me with a great time at a good price doesn’t guarantee she will do the same for you – or even for me on any given repeat visit. Way too many variables can affect that.

I’m with @Dolfan who said “I strongly prefer the club-oriented approach.” To me (who likes extras), I like knowing in general what’s available in the club, and info on dancer demographics, opportunities for privacy and extras, prices, etc., are mostly what I need from reviews.

For a club that I’ve not visited before, I come to TUSCL to get a sense of what kind of fun I might be able to have based on what usually goes on there, not who I’m supposed to be trolling for. Having been to 350+ strip clubs across North America over several decades, if I know the “house rules” through reading reviews here, I can usually tell after a brief in-person conversation who’s going to show me a good time.

Just my two cents...

I tried keeping a private list on my computer of Follies dancers that I knew did FS in VIP. I knew from personal experience and conversations with my close TUSCL buddies that I trusted. But it became a real headache trying to keep track of who was new and who had left, etc. There were probably around 30 names on the list. I shared this information with the same group of trusted buddies.

I finally deleted the whole thing

OP is a brand new account. So many of these ask, in one way or the other, for immediate details on what dancers do what. Could be another dancer, boyfriend, etc,

If you see something I said about Princess, that was probably about 8 Princesses ago.

Thank you all for your input. It was just a discussion. What I figured why it doesn’t exist is the reason yall gave. I also figured some ladies may do for others and won’t do for me.

I don't think strippers treat different PLs that differently, as long as they are polite.

PLs?

PL = pathetic losers. a joke term for customers. Cause we pay to be with attractive women rather than embracing our fugliness. Click on glossary, three text lines up from the last one on the page.