tuscl

I'd love to see this happen.

shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
Constitutional rights attorney says police trampled the 4th amendment rights of strippers

San Diego - The city of San Diego could be facing dozens of lawsuits in the wake of a work permit operation conducted on nearly 30 strippers at Cheetahs strip club in Kearny Mesa.

"They went in there and they just trampled over these women's civil rights," said constitutional rights attorney Dan Gilleon.

Gilleon was talking about an operation last Thursday at Cheetahs strip club where 10-police officers came into the club to check work permit cards of strippers. "Officers just come running in there, female officers running in with bullet proof vests on and with guns at their hips," Cheetahs manager Rich Buonantony told San Diego 6. Buonantony said the strippers were herded into a rear locker room, made to strip down to bras and panties, all to check and see if they had their work permit cards. Then, Buonantony said police took pictures of all of them against their will, pictures that had already been taken when the strippers applied for their work cards.

"What they did appears to me to be only justified if there was a criminal investigation, if they had probable cause to believe that there was some sort of crime that had occurred. Only then did they have the right to detain these women and degrade them by taking their photographs. Up until that point, they had no right to do what they did," Gilleon said.

Instead of an on camera interview, which San Diego 6 was told Tuesday we would be provided to ask questions about the card check operation, the police department did an about face Wednesday and opted instead to provide a statement. It said in part: "These inspections are conducted throughout the year and are not announced. Locations generating complaints are inspected more often. Ensuring regulatory compliance is part of the process while not impacting the club's regular working operation."

There were nearly 30-women detained that night. Gilleon said the city is now looking at nearly 30-lawsuits. "I don't know how the city's gonna afford this sort of thing anymore. It's just stupid for them to do this... They need to produce an explanation and indicate that there was an actual criminal investigation they were conducting. And short of that, I think they're in big trouble."

In light of pledges from newly appointed police chief Shelley Zimmerman to operate her department in a transparent manner, we reached out to the mayor's office for a comment on Wednesday. They got back to us and told us they're looking into the situation. You can count on San Diego 6 to continue to follow this story and demand answers

23 comments

  • SlickSpic
    11 years ago
    The PD has to protect the citizenry. These strippers are a menace to society.
  • steve229
    11 years ago

    "First they came for the strippers..."
  • SlickSpic
    11 years ago
    "...Then they grabbed the DJ and the bathroom troll..."
  • skibum609
    11 years ago
    Let's see women who dance naked stripped down to bra and panties. The damages per stripper seem to be about $3.00, but the statute the attorney will sue under will allow the collection of attorney's fees so another greedy piece of shit out to make money and who could not give a damn about anyone's "rights".
  • crazyjoe
    11 years ago
    These cops are ass holes. They need to be put back in line
  • rockstar666
    11 years ago
    I hope they pay through the nose. Just because the women are dancers doesn't mean they can be treated as chattel.
  • steve229
    11 years ago

    @skibum609 - so you would have no problem with a squad of riot police bursting into your office to check if your bar certificate was current?
  • steve229
    11 years ago
    "...Then they grabbed the DJ and the bathroom troll..."

    Them they can have, lol
  • rickdugan
    11 years ago
    skibum, normally I would agree with you re: attorneys, but not in this case. There is no doubt that the judicial system is packed full of nonsensical bullshit cases, but it also serves the very legitimate purpose of serving as a place of redress when government officials, including law enforcement, overstep the boundaries.

    Storming the club with a swat team was excessive and they had absolutely no right to detain these girls, nevermind requiring them to strip down. If you let them get away with it without any consequences, then what's next? The fact that they were dancers is irrelevant, unless dancing has suddenly become illegal in the state of CA.
  • rockstar666
    11 years ago
    @rick: What do you mean being a dancer is irrelevant unless dancing is illegal? Do prostitutes have to show their pussies to cops on demand, just because prostitution is illegal?
  • ATACdawg
    11 years ago
    The behavior if the police in this instance was egregiously bad. To humiliate those women by lining them up in their undies for unnecessary pictures is really bad. Heads should roll over this.
  • knight_errant
    11 years ago
    Having represented LEO myself, both in official and union capacities, I would be surprised if none of the officers' conduct was improper. 10 officers in the club and in the dressing room? Having them strip down to bras and panties. Didn't fly for for school officials searching an 8th grader for drugs (under the public school's lower standard of "reasonable suspicion")- see Safford v. Redding http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/… - so I question how the SDPD believes it met the higher standard of probable cause for conducting their search (it is not indicated from the articles I have read- maybe the dancers consented? All it takes is a few singles, amirite?).

    I'm not admitted in CA but if it is like other states, if any of these officials acted outside of the scope of their legal authority (under the color of state law), the city might have to provide independent legal defense for such officer(s) and that gets pricey.
  • mikeya02
    11 years ago
    Some of the girls there have been getting tickets from undercover cops for stuff like "misconduct". Why the girls love their regulars. I don't see how the cops can take pictures of the girls though. Their entertainer cards are issued at the police department with a head shot.
  • crazyjoe
    11 years ago
    You dont get photographed in your undies when pulled over for a traffic stop to check of you have tattoos or add tsttoos to the database. This is no different. The cops had the right to check id's and permits/ licenses etc. But that is as far as it should have gone unless extra activities were seen by cops
  • rickdugan
    11 years ago
    rockstar posted: "What do you mean being a dancer is irrelevant unless dancing is illegal? Do prostitutes have to show their pussies to cops on demand, just because prostitution is illegal?"

    Yes rock, I am saying exactly that, at least if she was caught in the act and subject to arrest. The laws vary state to state regarding invasive searches, but there is a huge difference between the rights of someone who is being detained for an actual crime vs. one who is not. And I'm not even sure this qualifies as a strip search as they were allowed to keep on their bras and panties.
  • Papi_Chulo
    11 years ago
    “… newly appointed police chief Shelley Zimmerman …”


    Sounds like the “new” police chief is a chick and most civvi chicks probably hate dancers & SCs
  • deogol
    11 years ago
    Big money in the future for those girls.
  • minnow
    11 years ago
    I find it interesting to read the posts on this subject here, and on the pink site. (Industry Insight section.) One prominent ex-dancer poster (post#4) opines that a judge will rule AGAINST club dancers complaint, on the rationale that in having to be licensed dancers that they give up some constitutional guarantees by virtue of being licensed. (i.e., dancing is a privilige, not a right.)

    Even so, sending in a SWAT team for a simple credential check is going overboard, IMO. (I didn't see anything about reasonable suspicion of illegal drug possesion, weapon possesion, harboring criminals, etc.)I don't recall a SWAT team being sent in for routine liquor license inspections, or health code inspections for other establishments. Interesting to see how this plays out.
  • sharkhunter
    11 years ago
    If this is ok, what's next? A raid on an all catholic girl school making the girls strip down to their underwear while the police take pics of any tatoos? There could be a rumour that something illegal was going on. A raid is justified because of a rumour right? Maybe raids inside the homes of families and make all the wives and girls strip down to underwear so that all tatoos can be documented? Sounds like a profitable set up for a sneaky tatoo porn site. Someone might complain though.
  • sharkhunter
    11 years ago
    I'm just saying if it's ok for the police to round up all the girls in one place and have them strip down while the police take pictures, who's going to say it's not ok when the police do the same thing to your house or your kids school?
  • captainned
    11 years ago
    In FLA there have been SAT team sent for liquor code violations . Check out rutherford.org great civil liberties site
  • captainned
    11 years ago
    I mean SWAT teams sent out for liquor code checks
  • captainned
    11 years ago
    In FLA there have been SAT team sent for liquor code violations . Check out rutherford.org great civil liberties site
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion