Why?
Lone_Wolf
Arizona
Speaking specifically within the American Culture. Why are middle aged men so seemingly vilified for pursuing smoking hot young women? Is it justified?
Seems in all aspects of our culture middle age men that pursue the charms only a young woman has to offer are referred to as perverts, dirty old men, sugar daddys etc... This perception is reflected in the media and perpetrated in almost all areas of our society.
I mean what the fuck does society want a middle aged fugly dude to do, just crawl under a rock somewhere and die?
Fuck that, I still want fine pussy regardless of my age.
Seems in all aspects of our culture middle age men that pursue the charms only a young woman has to offer are referred to as perverts, dirty old men, sugar daddys etc... This perception is reflected in the media and perpetrated in almost all areas of our society.
I mean what the fuck does society want a middle aged fugly dude to do, just crawl under a rock somewhere and die?
Fuck that, I still want fine pussy regardless of my age.
29 comments
Oprah made a Billion dollars kindling the fires of such propaganda.
I think it's more along the lines of setting realistic standards for who they date in a normal sense and considering more than looks in the equation.
I think everyone has some implicit place they ought to be in the social ladder. It is accepted that men will want women slightly younger and better looking than themselves, while women will typically want men slightly higher up that ladder. If the disparities are too great it all looks pretty fishy.
So the right person for a middle-aged fugly dude, might well be a young super-model, if the dude is a rich party-boy. More likely though, what is more appropriate is going to be a woman > 30, probably with some kids from another relationship and maybe of just average looks.
"Pursuit" of smoking hot women in strip clubs, isn't real pursuit at all and is considered avoidance of a realistic relationship.
When there's enough food to feed the world
Why when there're so many of us
Are there people still alone
Why are the missiles called peace keepers
When they're aimed to kill
Our "Puritanical" & "Overzealous Religious Right" persons WANT us middle aged & senior men to be married to a woman our OWN age. They will do what is needed to spread their message because they think their way is the way.
Just stay unmarried, so you can screw around all you WISH!
Here's how I am able to pursue smoking hot younger girls anyway: I married a smoking hot wife and send her after them. Then we both get to enjoy smoking hot younger girls.
Problem solved.
Also, the reasons that a middle-aged man would want to pursue a much younger women are rarely non-sexual. Do you want to talk about Tumblr trends? Do you want to watch Keeping up with the Kardashians? Everyone knows your motivations. It's ok. If you want to date girls way younger than you, do it.
'Cause when I'm in my 40s I'll most likely be touching myself to Abercrombie & Fitch catalogs and gazing upon my carefully preserved Taylor Lautner posters.
I said "women are held responsible for nothing." Which part of the Steubenville victim's behavior do you allege she was being held responsible for?
It might be like leaving out the information about a survey villifying men that the people surveyed were priests or some other biased group.
The old women resent us when our smile and flowers get the attention of a 22 y/o, just as much as they resent us when we pay cash. The young men are just as confused seeing old guys walking the beach with a hot blond as they are watching us get the chicks in a strip club.
Women have typically seeked security via $$$/resources and older men have tended to be the ones to have these resources and been willing to exchange them for what a young beautiful woman can provide (sex and beauty).
Often times May/December “relationships†are constituted by a well enough to do older man and an attractive young woman.
It really comes down to the frowning by society of P4P.
My question, which I would appreciate you actually answering, was this:
"I said 'women are held responsible for nothing.' Which part of the Steubenville victim's behavior do YOU allege she was being held responsible for?"
So, women are held responsible for some things by some people and you can't make a generalized statement like that and have it be correct.
A man goes alone to a strange bar in a sketchy neighborhood and proceeds to drink copious amounts of alcohol and flash cash, as he walks down the street in the dark he's assaulted and robbed. Many (most imo) would say 'what a dumbass to make so many stupid choices, no wonder he got beaten'.
Obviously those are oversimplifications but in general I think they're fair. When you look at it from that perspective I think jayjay's comment had SOME merit, though I certainly don't agree with it in totality.
Secondly, you still didn't answer my question. So I am going to let it ride, and just figure you had three chances to read and respond appropriately to my posts, and still didn't manage to do so. I will let you figure out how much philosophical insight I will accept from a chick who repeatedly can't even respond to three or four sentence posts appropriately when it comes to her thoughts about the vast expanse of reality.
Hint: It's closer to zero per cent than one hundred per cent.