So why the change?
founder
slip a dollar in her g-string for me
I guess some of you noticed a few changes. The changes were made for the betterment of the site going forward. Nearly 50% of our traffic now comes from smartphones (not cellphones, but phones with browsers), and that number is only going up. The site redesign is to merge the two technologies (PCs and Smartphones) into one site. Maintaining two sites (one mobile and one desktop) is just not in my time budget, nor do I think it necessary for the type of site that tuscl is.
It is for this reason that reviews are now scrollable one at a time (less data per page), and avatars are now resized to a smaller size and turned into png files (rather than animated gifs), along with most other changes. It is to create less data transfer per page. The new design will also allow me to do more things on the back end and I am working on more features, which are top secret right now ;) Also, the new site creates more pageviews, which creates more revenue. If you'd personally like to pay my rent, I will go back to the old way ;)
I'm sure many of you have feature requests. You can post them here, or send a PM, or use the contact link below.
Thanks, and have a great 2012
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
61 comments
Latest
Keep up the good work!
I think the feature most of us would like to have is the ability to edit or delete posts. Most other forums allow for this.
Sometimes we are just poor typists esp on phones but sometimes we wish we could delete a comment we later regret.
I did mention in a thread about running the Site on a Subscription Basis.
I hope that the increased features are worth the loss of ease of use on a PC. The site IMO is now not very PC Friendly, and I access it via PC 99% of the time. Oh well...
Post Scriptum: More than once I've asked about including a way to back & edit posts after hitting the "Post Comment" button.
@jb69 - I am working on something similar to your subscribe idea. as for paying users, well, if I had google money, I would be all for that ;)
@alucard - see comment above re post edits, and we do have the site on a subscription basis (and thanks for buying a lifetime one at that), but the money is not the only issue. the issue is staying current with the times (would you still pay $20 for an airdance from the 1980s?). If tuscl isnt usuable, then it goes away. Give me some specific examples of the site not being PC friendly, and I will look into them. (I agree the site is not taking advantage of all that I can on a pc, but remember, it needs to run on ALL browsers)
Warning: imagepng() [function.imagepng]: Unable to open '/home/httpd/vhosts/tuscl.net/pictures/4b8af5be2b7fe-texas.j…' for writing in /home/httpd/vhosts/tuscl.net/new/classes/class.image.php on line 290
What does this mean in laymans terms?
However, I do think that limiting the discussion threads per page to 10 will dissuade people from participating in the older ones.
That said, please, please, please add back the thread post counts and last date and time to the places it was before, e.g. discussions club reviews and articles, rather than this "x hours ago" thing. And if it's not too big a deal, the post and review counts for reviewers and discussion posters.
Let me start of by saying that I have enjoyed TUSCL for a few years now, and the information posted here has proven to be very valuable numerous times.
As for the new site, let’s just call it what it is (as you said): “the new site creates more pageviews, which creates more revenue.†For what it’s worth, I respect that. I don’t like it, but I can respect it.
With that said, I’m not buying the maintaining two sites excuse.
I am not a website expert. I have only personally built one website in my life. And I don’t know how your site runs, so I don’t know what limitations you are up against. But, given my professional background and experience, I just can’t get my head around the assertion that it would be so much more work.
From what I’ve been reading up on, CSS3 (maybe also CSS2, not really sure) allows for ‘broswer capability’ detect. You throw in some code to detect if it a personal computer based browser or smart phone browser. Then the display rules, amount of text, picture sizes, etc. (and resulting data transfer) then happen automatically. It still is one site, but the display format varies from PC to tablet to phone. I’ll know more after I have time to run in by some friends at work.
For your sake, I hope the creating more pageviews works out for you. For the high volume guy on here that I enjoyed following, I hope it goes the way of the failed $5 debit card fees and Verizon’s failed $2 charge to pay online.
It’s just too tedious to click click click compared to a few days ago. I just don’t enjoy the site now. So, I just don’t see myself checking in daily or even a couple of times a day anymore.
Additionally, the "member since/club reviews/etc." is missing from the reviews and discussion board posts. This was helpful in weeding out the less credible posters and shills. With this intel we were able to help keep the pollution out via flagging, etc. It would seem you have abandoned this free help we provide in the name of more eyeballs of the types who pollute other sites such as strip club list.
Want more eyeballs? Give the gals their place:
While you're at it, create a new section to preserve the best works written by dancers. Call it DPV for short (Dancer's Point of View). Allow the rank and file to comment to the pieces. Adding the DPV zone will give dancers a reason to stop by and motivate them to author additional content. Provide 3 free months for something which makes the DPV zone.* In turn you'll get more stimulative reading for your membership, benefit from word of mouth, and enjoy a virtuous cycle of growth. Otherwise you're fumbling away content as past quality works fade into oblivion.
[This idea is similar to bars offering half-price ladies nights to "get 'em in the door". Then the money-spending stags follow...]
YES, TUSCL is dedicated to the customer experience. But YES, you're looking for additional revenue/eyeballs. Time to grow!
(And I apologize for the lack of editing....... truth-be-told, this little rectangular box to type in is too small to spend much time editing within. Give me a box twice as large please and my sentence construction/thought organization and overall readibility will improve!)
Please consider the concept of making site user friendly for exisiting users in the format that they're most likely to use. Some users that have iphones still have laptops. Is someone trying to decide which club(s) they should visit going to do 10-30 individual hits on their iphone while driving a rental car through rush hour traffic, or on their laptop from the relative quiet/comfort of hotel room, office, or home?
I won't nitpick too much, several users have listed some good ideas ( viewable number of reviews by author, etc). As I've stated before, the old format of being able to scroll through 10 complete reviews on single page is MORE user friendly than new format. I'm not a web designer, I've read 1 tusclers comment about 2 seperate sites, but whatever it would take to go back to old system of viewing club reviews would be my unequivocal pick for making ONE change if I could only choose one. BTW, Happy New Year, all.
1) The font is too small -- makes reading reviews and discussion a strain on the eyes.
2) Clicking through the reviews of a club one at a time is tedious -- the old style of 10 at a time is much better.
3) The geographical sorting of the recent reviews list is good -- makes finding clubs in an area you live in or will be visiting easier.
I visit the TUSCL site exclusively from a desktop PC, so any "improvements" for users with other devices are meaningless for me. I will continue to visit this site, but less freqently, and spend my time on other sites covering similar ground (like Best GFE).
Happy New Year!
As you might have read, of all the changes you have made in my 10+ years here, many I didn't care for at first, but was quickly able to adapt. But this time, my trusty IBM 1410 is going nuts! I guess I will have to upgrade.
Just wanted to say this site continues to do what I need it to do. It's been an invaluable resource to me for more years than I want to think about.
Thanks for your work on the site and happy new year.
LL
Thanks for taking the time to walk through the changes.
Most of this stuff will take some getting used to, but I think that everyone will adapt. The one feature that I really do miss badly is the ability to see the number of reviews and clubs covered by each member at the outset when I am scrolling reviews. Frankly, some of these clubs have so many "1 and 1" reviewers that it is very helpful if I can see the counts at the outset in order to determine which reviews to spend time on. If there was any way to place that data in the taglines that link to each review it would be helpful. I do realize that more page hits = more revenue, but needing to click through to 10 shill reviews before I find one with meat on the bone is going to make this site harder to use.
@bellman - please send a screen capture of the small font (it should be the same size as the previous version) also, what OS and Browser are you using?
@ all mobile users - pinch zoom should be working now
the # of posts/reviews/clubs per user will be returning (it needs to be optimized to run faster)
@, ctqwerty, there is something in the works for women, but lets face it, most dancers don't stay long here because when they post, they very often get bashed.
Thanks. Zoom works. That was my only complaint. I liked the display changes for smartphones but I missed the zoom. Much better.
In an earlier discussion with another member here I said don't worry founder has always fixed usability problems here. Looks like this time I was wrong as this is for a specific strategy. I seldom use my smart phone for here. And the clickathon will chaange my approach. In the old days, last week, I would enter ans scroll through reviews until I hit one I had read before. Then go to discussions and review comments the same way.
Now I'm simply going to follow 4-5 locals clubs and look at 1st ten reviews to see if any are interesting. Then glance a 1st page oft discussions. I suspect my page views will be down.
Now, can you get Shadowcat inducted to the TUSCL Hall of Fame???
(And give me a 50% larger rectangle to type in--scrolling is a pain in the arse!)
Having him explain some of his decisions really makes a difference. Might not agree, but I can respect his reasoning. OK, off the soap box.
Y'all have a Happy New Year!!!
I think too many users feel the site is about them and their egos. Probably just like when they wander into a club and get upset when dancers don't flock to them.
Sarcasm, my friend, sarcasm, at least the first sentence.
I notice I have to log in now where I used to stay logged in... should I think of deleting the cookies for the site from my computer and letting Firefox create new ones?
1) A middle-ground like TER does it? There, after you post, you have a limited period to modify it (like 24 hrs, or something like that). After that, it goes hard (no further mods).
- or -
2) A "Review" step to view the post as it will appear before committing to it, like Meetup does?
It's frustrating and sometimes embarrassing to not be able to modify the communications I'm intending to post. I think either approach would be a welcomed improvement.
In any case, thanks for hosting this site. It's the best thing going for SC aficionados.
For smartphone users, far too much of the most precious screen real estate there is -- the top of the page -- is devoted to rarely used functions (buttons linking to My stuff -- profile, photos, reviews, articles...).
- E
I have tried to access it on my smartphone before Christmas and decided to just get out the laptop, so thanks for making it mobile friendly!
The new format works very well on my iPhone. Thank you and congrats.
After reading this I remembered I tried to change my picture yesterday since the club no longer works, and it didn't seem to work. And today, there she is!