Can "no touch" laws actually increase mileage?
DoctorDarby
Ohio
I had a bit of a revelation after another really good, 2-way touch, moderately-priced VIP in an Ohio club, where all touching is supposed to be illegal. In the old days prior to this law, the dancer could "legally" touch you via the grinding, but you could not touch her at all: the "touch and go," hands-at-your-sides policy was strictly enforced in many clubs, even in VIP. Now that ALL touching in both directions is technically illegal, it makes no sense to restrict who touches who and where they touch. If LE decided to enforce the law, they bust ALL dancer-customer, dancer-dancer contact, regardless of who is the toucher or touchee. So, why get fined getting/giving a plain old lap dance if you will get the same citation for having the customer's hands on the girl's boobs or cupping her ass? Obviously, any actual sex act is another category of violation, but I'm finding it easier to caress dancers during lap dances in more clubs than I did prior to the passage of this goofy law. Is this ironic justice or only a coincidence?
17 comments
The cops haven't raided a club in a while, but they've been going after the Craigslist "entertainers" and the underground places-with underage prostitutes. I like what they're doing now and I hope they continue to leave the clubs alone.
i really don't see much of a difference between pre and post touch law other than i'm more experienced now and usually negotiate what i expect before i buy a dance and that weeds out the dancers that won't allow touching.
Ironically, if you do get a lap dance, you find the girls have actually upped their mileage to compensate. Stick shifting, simulated BJ through the pants, boobs in the face, flashing the kitty, etc. are all apparently ok as long as they keep both feet on the ground, lol. Even the girls that used to give mainly air dances are giving a full-on grind now.
Hey, I'm not complaining, my personnel mileage has never been higher. I suppose I should do I review clueing guys in, but for now I think I'll just keep it to myself.
Houston's SC ordinance was meant to kill the industry, but like I've said earlier, universally ignored and rarely enforced. Also, City Council fought like hell to try to keep citizens from deciding if red light cameras stay or go. The election is in November.
With restricive laws the norm on many areas, the "will and the way' philosophy is winning out.
Oh, come on now degol...