Comments by Puddy Tat (page 13)

More hurr durr durr RACIST!!!!1!1!1 Newsflash, that charge is so overused as to be meaningless. Don't want a gang taking over your apartment? RACIST! Don't want your tax dollars putting them up in nice hotels? RACIST! Don't want them committing crimes then back on the street to commit more hours later? RACIST! Don't like Obama hectoring black men about who to vote for? RACIST! Get new material, peeps. The racism charge is do 2020.

^ Shit, i forgot Arby's beef and cheddar but where i live doesn't have many Arby's.

Political threads outside the Political Discourse forum make the Baby Jesus cry.

A) Wendy's spicy chicken B) The Serengeti C) Gladiator

Democrats are obsessed with dongs, namely cutting them off, hormonally shrinking them, and crafting them onto people not meant to have them.

^ Yep. Pleased as punch, lol. From the worst QB in the league throwing him the ball to top 3.

@rickdugan - my league isn't PPR but after 2 people dropped out last minute it's a 10 person league, I have Jefferson, Collins (though on IR), Waddle (should improve with Tua back), Cooper (traded from the Factory of Sadness).

D). Boobs in my hands

^ Black girl nipples are my default. The Puddy Tat is a raging chocoholic. Don't know why, I didn't grow up around a lot of black girls or exposed to a lot of the culture but it seems like since I started dating, black women and I couldn't get enough of each other.

"It is LITERALLY the same thing... You can't break the equivilency because you LIKE one of the crimes vs the other you claim is ruining the country. crime is crime bro... and you are guilty as charged... so let's step back from the whole "I'm not a criminal... " for you most certainly are..." No, the same thing would be if we were caught with our dicks inside strippers and were rewarded with hotel rooms within walking distance of the club, 3 meals a day, condoms, and lube if we wanted to do anal. Both are illegal, but one is actively rewarded and subsidized by the government. Obama was always a used car salesman. Never got why people fell under his spell. All he does is misrepresent his opponents and throw snide remarks at the straw man.

Color: Brown is good but it depends on the woman. Areola: Average to match the boob. Proportional. Nipple: Small ish but suckable Pierced: No, but not a big deal either way I tend to like large, dark-skinned boobs, myself.

@25 - Tim Walz always looks like he's constipated and trying to push out a log.

^ Exactly. If you see a chick you like, why just wait around?

I've noticed that too, recently. I love gorgeous, built like a brick shithouse (not BBW but Amazon, like @Drew's #1 above) dancers but I've noticed either they're either afraid of breaking me (I'm a big and pretty strong guy) or think touching their big gorgeous knockers are enough of a privilege that they don't have to do anything more. Someone on a Desire review mentioned Toni's "golden tits syndrome." That's a perfect term.

@misterorange - couldn't have said it better myself. Illegal immigrants (undocumented my ass) are a protected class whose crimes democrats sweep under the rug.

"The radical left constantly whines about the fact they have no power." They act like getting only 80% of what they want is a travesty. They're not a majority, even of Democrats, but their donors and activists provide the party's money and energy. The radical left papers (some of which I mentioned above) have lavished praise on Biden for being progressive, even while he ran as a "centrist." Harris was the most left Senator (more than avowed socialist Sanders) during her time in the Senate, whose 2020 policy platform which she didn't even backtrack on until a couple months ago involved decriminalizing illegal immigration, outlawing private health insurance, defunding the police (so much for "law and order"!), banning fracking, EV mandates, reparations...an overall left wet dream...and who chose arguably the farthest-left governor as VP. That is not the nominee of a moderate or even center-left party.

@RonJax - now, did that amount of troll accounts and posts tip the election? I'm placing asymmetrical blame on this because I ONLY ever hear the left blaming it for their failures, as if Russia is united and full-throated in support of Trump. You're saying something that would get you burned at the stake in leftist circles. I'm not just talking memes, I'm talking columnists from "respectable" media who are saying this shit. Is it Russian propaganda that Harris was the farthest-left Senator during her time in office? Is BLM Russian propaganda? Or that American radicals call punctuality and hard work "acting white" and looting "reparations"? Or that she and Walz support removing most restrictions on sex change surgeries? That shit is out there and on the record. Can't blame Russia for all that...though I'd bet anyone here $10,000 that within 10 years we'll see a foreign actor (probably China) behind BLM. In the end, we have to look at ourselves. Social media algorithms are going to have a thousand times the influence Russia does. Like I've said that's why I read stuff from all sides and make judgments on the arguments. I'm more vocal than I used to be but hardly "radicalized"...I've been pro-choice for only the last 10 years or so, support tax reforms on both sides, and think it's laughable to say it's easier to be black than white in America. Frankly, I'd be shocked if we, Russia, China, Israel, and anyone with means isn't sticking their noses in everyone else's elections.

^ I guess Russia controls most major urban newspapers, The Nation, Salon, Mother Jones, the American Prospect, the New Republic, and a host of other left wing publications from which i regularly read articles. Lol it's all Russia because if it were the radical left that's wagging the Democratic party dog, that would be unthinkable...right...?

^ So because i pointed out the obvious, and it doesn't agree with you, i have to be under the influence of Russian propaganda? Unless they've hacked and are secretly controlling all the left wing sources i read, I'm getting it straight from the horse's mouth. Are you saying Russia was playing both sides? Because only one has been flogging it and calling EVERYTHING they don't like Russian propaganda. Get real, man.

@ClubFan - You ever been to Pleasant Moments Bridgeport? You'll want to shower with bleach after going to one of their VIPs.

"The US really needs to figure out how to fight online Russian propaganda." Russia Russia Russia is the left's all purpose excuse for failure and avoiding introspection. $150,000 worth of Facebook ads didn't tip the balance over Hollary's utterly butt-brained campaign. Perhaps, instead of Russia, it's your own ideas and attempts to divide the country by race, sex, gender identity, and any other demographic characteristic that are the cause for strife, and not Russia???

^ I was waiting for someone to make the obvious Stormy Daniels joke.

@RonJax "You just named a bunch of them below. Just because a publication has editorial bias doesn't mean it's not reputable, and standards based." It means it is not to be taken at its word, and needs to be counterbalanced. If it's trading on a reputation it has since forsaken, it is not reliable. "To me what you're saying sounds like regular old confirmation bias: you're rejecting these things because they challenge your prior opinions." Asserted without evidence. When everything is skewed and stealth-edited to benefit one side, that is evidence of systemic bias, not human error. "I'd argue for you or I or anyone else there's much more at work than "I read the news and here's what my opinions are."" I agree with this--and I think it goes even further to balances of neurotransmitters and genes that go back into the womb--but it isn't helpful because everyone has them. I can defend anything I believe, or I change my mind. There may be a time and a place for either kind of policy, but I see what works and what doesn't and form my opinions accordingly.

@RonJax - "What reputable news sources do you subscribe to?" What reputable news sources exist? The legacy MSM has dropped even the pretense of objectivity. The FBI crime stats (like we're seeing in recent revisions) and economic statistics (in which growth keeps getting revised down and unemployment revised up) can't be taken seriously either. At least the right wing ecosystem doesn't pretend to be something other than what they are. I read arguments from both sides, left (NYT, Salon, the Nation, WaPo, MSNBC, The Guardian), right (Fox, National Review, NYP, WSJ), and some who post from both sides (RealClearPolitics, Politico, the Hill) and judge the arguments on their merits...who is appealing to emotions, trying to pass off snide remarks as facts, gaslighting, or not telling the whole truth (admittedly, this last one is everyone). That makes me a conservative 90% of the time.

^ Hurr durr durr RRRRAAAACCCCIIISSSTTT!!!1!1!1