discussion comment
5 years ago
^Aren't you supposed to be 28 years old?
College for you would've only been 6-10 years ago.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I would love a kitten or puppy lol.
Idk about TrapBaby but I agree that StripperCutie is a sweetheart. I hope she comes back to TUSCL someday.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
@Iceyloco
They didn't used to like that stuff though. They only started liking it when porn taught them that they should like it. Honestly, for all the talk that there is about porn affecting young men's perceptions of negatively, I think porn has had more of a negative impact on how young women look at sex than it has on guys. I think its because of the idea that porn is mostly made for men, but a lot of girls still watch it and after watching it think "okay so that's what guys like in a girl." Which basically means that porn has convinced girls that guys just want a fuck machine. Most guys don't actually want their girlfriend to act like a pornstar though.
I don't like the direction our society is heading in. Just a couple days ago, I was watching a show that had a gory violent scene involving a woman getting impaled with a bayonet, writhing in pain, and somebody in the comments was talking about how much the scene aroused him. Then another person basically went "yo wtf" and another person responded with the typical progressive bullshit of "everybody has different fetishes and things they're turned on by, don't judge people for that as long as they're not harming anybody."
Well here's the thing. That statement would sense if we were talking about foot fetishes or food play." It does not fucking apply though to a person getting turned on seeing a woman writhing in pain and getting stabbed to death with a bayonet. That clearly crosses the line into, yes, you are fucking hurting people with your actions. So stop using progressive bullshit to justify the fact that you fundamentally are aroused by seeing a woman in pain and that is fucking disgusting. But because of the popularity of "moral relativism" nowadays, you can't tell anybody that what they're doing is wrong. At first it made sense but now people are using that ideology to justify things that really are immoral by giving a standard "morality is subjective" reasoning.
When we've gotten to the point where we're justifying somebody getting turned on by seeing somebody in pain, we've gone way too fucking far. We should have never reached this point but somehow we did. People are so determined to justify each and every fetish out there that we're comfortable with people making disgustingly sadistic statements as long as its in the context of sexual pleasure. What people need to understand is that "consent" is the only thing holding these people back from being serial killers. Consent reduces the harm but it does not eliminate it. What's creating more harm than anything though is our idea that consent somehow removes the moral value of the action. Somebody who is operating under that assumption may torture their partner dozens of times and get away with it whereas somebody who doesn't have consent may only torture somebody once or twice and then get thrown in jail. Somebody who is turned on by pain is turned on by pain, their subconscious mind doesn't recognize "consent" only their conscious mind recognizes it so that they can get away with expressing that desire without being thrown in jail for the rest of their life.
S&M literally stands for "Sadism and Masochism." The fact that our perverted society has started viewing fucking sadism as some kind of fun sexual quirk makes me not want to live on this planet anymore.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Nidan
Trimester? That's interesting, we only get two semesters per year.
That does sound like a lot of work. I can't say I envy your college. I think professors today seem to want to be on their students level a lot more and try harder to understand what they may be going through in their personal lives. Also, you occasionally get professors who just don't give a shit anymore and don't assign much homework because they themselves don't want to create or grade very much lol.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Fuck being an alpha male honestly, I'm comfortable with beta cuck status.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
While I do agree with you that past societies didn't really recognize the existence of adolescence, I should definitely point out that your numbers are off. Like I said, a 14 year old in 1800 would've looked like an actual child. A lot of people mix up the ideas of "marriage" vs "betrothal." Being betrothed to someone means you agree to marry them when you're older and ready for it, which back then often meant shortly after puberty was finished. Girls usually didn't have their first period until they were 17. So despite what you may have heard, girls in the 1700s and 1800s getting married before the age of 18 was uncommon. In-fact, the average age of marriage in for most of the late 17th century, the 18th and early to mid 19th century was actually 24 or 25 for women and 26 or 27 for men. Shockingly similar to the average age today of 27 for women and 29 for men. In-fact, you only had to go two decades into the past in the year 2000 to find marriage patterns nearly identical to 18th and 19th century Europe.
People must have been really fucking sexually frustrated because pre-marital sex was pretty taboo back then. Most people didn't do it unless they were fairly certain they were going to marry that person. This was the basis for shotgun weddings, since a lot of younger people back then put off actually getting married until it became an "emergency" to cover up pre-marital sex.
If you look at historical literature used as "evidence" for how young women got married back then, you actually discover when you read about the context surrounding it that it was intentionally done to stir up controversy or to give a message to young audiences. For example, Romeo and Juliet.
William Shakespeare's drama Romeo and Juliet puts Juliet's age at just short of fourteen years; the idea of a woman marrying in secret at a very early age would have scandalized Elizabethans. The common belief in Elizabethan England was that motherhood before 16 was dangerous; popular manuals of health, as well as observations of married life, led Elizabethans to believe that early marriage and its consummation permanently damaged a young woman's health, impaired a young man's physical and mental development, and produced sickly or stunted children. Therefore, 18 came to be considered the earliest reasonable age for motherhood and 20 and 30 the ideal ages for women and men, respectively, to marry. Shakespeare might also have reduced Juliet's age from sixteen to fourteen to demonstrate the dangers of marriage at too young of an age; that Shakespeare himself married Anne Hathaway when he was just eighteen (very unusual for an Englishman of the time) might hold some significance.
Now it should be noted that from Medieval Times to the 18th and 19th century, the average age of marriage got higher. I'm convinced that people in Medieval Times specifically may have actually reached puberty earlier than people later did due to various examples of teenagers having adult roles in Medieval Times. Why this is the case I'm not sure yet though. One thing they have in common however is that neither medieval times nor the 19th century really recognized adolescence as a stage of life.
I think though that we should consider adolescence and young adulthood as a stage of life. It gives people a chance to experiment with the "fun" parts of adulthood without having serious consequences possibly unfold on them if they make a mistake. Some people are also just not quite ready to grow up yet.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
To the person who made the hardcore porn comment...
I'm a product of the generation that grew up with free online porn everywhere when I was not even old enough to be masturbating yet. While I do think some teenage boys think "hardcore is better." I personally don't like and have never liked hardcore porn very much. I'd much rather fap to a simple, tasteful picture of a girl in a bikini than "thirsty little slut cucks her husband and gets her tight pussy DESTROYED by BIG BLACK THROBBING COCK!"
This is actually a major reason why I strongly prefer lesbian porn. I can't stand how rough and degrading a lot of mainstream porn is. It puts me off and makes me feel weirded out. Most of the time though, lesbian porn is sensual and often times kind of cute. When lesbian porn gets lustful it looks like real passion. This isn't always the case, I've seen some lesbian porn that freaked me out too but most of it is pretty tasteful.
Anyway though, my point is that a lot of people seem to assume that if a more extreme version of something is out there that that's what people will want. That's not always true, I'm sure there's quite a few people out there like myself that are more turned on by sensual and erotic imagery than by extreme content.
discussion comment
5 years ago
"Sircumsinhispantsalot said that the best trolls are the ones who fit in and are accepted as contributing members when all they do is troll. That's pretty much what he does."
That's exactly what he does. He thinks the maker of a good troll profile is a troll that isn't accepted by others as being a troll. Since its blatantly obvious to everyone that he does troll though he tries to act like it doesn't count somehow if he just trolls unpopular board members.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
Papi_ChuloMiami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
A lot of people are dancing around saying this so I'll just go ahead and say it...
The Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue is supposed to be sexy. Its supposed to be tasteful sexiness that doesn't quite fall into the category of porn but is still sexy. The PC left doesn't like girls being "sexualized" though so they whine about it which makes the Sports Illustrated company try harder to make it less obvious that that is what its about.
A woman being featured in a hijab shows that she disagrees with the fundamental premise of a girl being featured in a bikini for men to be aroused by. Because of that, she really should have just not signed up for this or the company should not have tried to recruit someone for this because it doesn't make sense.
Its a clear move by a company who's magazine is not intended to pander to PC leftists to pander to the PC left anyway and that's what is actually frustrating people. There's other magazines out there I'm sure where featuring a woman in a hijab makes much more sense.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Having a moderator will result in biased "punishing" of what is being interpreted as "bad" behavior by the site members. If for example, PaulDrake was moderator, he'd probably be pretty harsh on SJG and IceyLoco but overlook txtittyfag and SirLDK. If NiceSpice was moderator, she'd probably be more harsh on IceyLoco and txtittyfag, but perhaps be a bit more lenient on SJG and SirLDK as well as her own profiles obviously. If I was moderator I'd probably be more harsh on txtittyfag and SirLDK but lenient on SJG and IceyLoco and my own profiles.
You really can't avoid having some level of bias in your decisions. Its impossible, even historians and political scientists with PhDs can't avoid having bias in their reporting of things.
discussion comment
5 years ago
IceyLoco definitely tries to start controversy seemingly on purpose. SJG really just has his own interests and passions and posts whatever he feels like posting regardless of if its on-topic or not.
With txtittyfag, 100% of his posting habits are dedicated to insulting people. I don't think I've yet to see an on-topic post from txtittyfag and amazingly, he has yet to be designated as a troll by "TrollWarnBot," despite perhaps being the most obvious and clear case of a troll profile on this site. With SirLDK, probably 90% or so of his posts insult people. I think the reason he doesn't bother you guys as much is because he doesn't post as frequently and insults a lot of the people you guys don't like. But imagine if he had the same posting habits but posted as frequently as Icey or SJG does?
discussion comment
5 years ago
@RickDugan
That's one thing that really confuses me about our police force. Compared to other developed countries, we really do have a high rate of serious crime that the police should be focusing on. We have gangs that shoot people, poison entire neighborhoods with their toxic influence, and purposely get kids addicted to crack and heroin and slip fentanyl into these drugs and all sorts of shit like that. Yet our police force often times is busy doing ridiculously sophisticated undercover sting operations with people getting hired to be a pretend criminal and having wires set up and getting bugged with microphones and stuff like that just to bust a liquor store that might occasionally sell alcohol to a 19 year old or to bust a prostitute or john having consensual sex.
What really confuses me is why people are willing to put up with this crap? Does anybody actually care if a 19 year old gets drunk sometimes? I mean, a lot of 19 year olds' own parents don't care anymore. If politicians are too lazy to change the law then that's whatever, but why are we paying the police to go to such ridiculous lengths in order to enforce it? Even among parents who do care if their 19 year old drinks, I imagine hardly any of them actually think this is a matter the police and judges should be handling but rather that it should be left up to the parents.
In European countries, they don't even card anybody at liquor stores. I've heard of 15 year olds managing to buy alcohol from liquor stores in Europe. In the US though we've started mandating that everybody who looks to be under the age of 40 be carded? I mean seriously wtf?
discussion comment
5 years ago
I do find it interesting that there's such a big uproar over IceyLoco and SJG yet txtittyfag kind of floats under the radar. As far as the infamous "threadjacking" goes, nobody is worse about that than SirLDK is. Anywhere that IceyLoco, SJG, Nicole, or I post, he will spam the thread with a dozen posts trying to fight with the person he doesn't like. The thing is, I don't really blatantly threadjack that often, my first posts are usually on topic and then I organically go with the flow once a thread has moved in another direction. SirLDK on the other hand harasses the users he doesn't like whenever he is posting. I guarantee if you looked into his discussion history that 90% of his posts are directed insults of some kind. I'll bet that if you actually studied their posting history, that IceyLoco and SJG stay on-topic much more than SirLDK or txtittyfag do.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
What do you mean by adolescent romances are head trips? I'm not familiar with that term.
Adulthood didn't start at 14 because people in the past went through puberty a lot later than they do today. 14 year olds in 1800 would have actually looked like children. Guys didn't even start going through puberty until 16 back then whereas today they start going through puberty in the 11-13 range. Developmentally, people in the early industrial age would've physically been four years behind people today. Not in terms of muscle strength, people back then were strong, but in terms of hormonal development. The difference was though that once you were done with puberty, you were considered a fully grown adult. There was no adolescence, or young adulthood stages, it was just, you're a child, you're becoming a man, you are a man.
So in 1800, a 14 year old boy would've looked like what we think of a 10 year old looking like today. Take a look at this photo for example of a Hitler's youth member getting a medal...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Youth#/media/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-G0627-500-001,_Auszeichnung_des_Hitlerjungen_Willi_H%C3%BCbner.jpg
If you were to take a guess you'd probably think this kid was 12 or 13...
This kid is 16 years old.
At every age I've always looked significantly younger than I really was but even I didn't look that young when I was 16.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I agree that SirLDK is the most annoying troll on the site. He's the first and only person I have ever blocked on this site. He basically harasses you by copying and pasting the same messages over and over again and then if you give him any legitimate arguments he finds the most absurd ways to dismiss them without actually addressing them or giving any of his own points.
SJG is right, nobody would put up with that f2f. They'd say "you know what this is fucking ridiculous" and leave. Something about the internet makes us more willing to engage with trolls though.
discussion comment
5 years ago
@Nidan
Yikes that is some harsh grading/schooling. I'm guessing you went to a private school?
discussion comment
5 years ago
I'm not sure why you're using pickup lines in a strip club unless you're just telling them as a joke. But in a strip club its honestly as simple as throw a $5 bill on stage, tell her you want a dance, and point to where you're sitting.
discussion comment
5 years ago
A mid B? Man that is so strange. 92% is an A- bordering on mid A. Are all your exams really easy?
Getting 92% on a paper or exam here takes a good bit of work. A lot of professors here really don't like to give grades higher than that. Often times the person with the very highest score got like 95% or 96%. 100% is extremely rare on major assignments. You can get 100% fairly easily on small assignment but for major papers or exams, you could have a class of 100 people and not one person will score that high. Professors here hate giving 100% as a grade. One professor who's class I didn't think was really that difficult showed that our university tells professors in charge of freshman and sophomore year gen ed classes to design exams so that the percentages come out to roughly this...
20% of students get a grade of 90% or higher.
30% of students will score between 80-89%.
30% of students will score 70-79%.
15% of students will score 60-69%.
5% of students will fail, scoring less than 60%.
Junior and senior year classes are actually quite a bit easier than freshman and sophomore classes because in those years, the college is trying to weed out the kids who are just here to party and hit them with bad grades so that they will drop out.
discussion comment
5 years ago
In what world is 92% average? Does your college do some serious curving of grades? At my school getting 92% would put you close to the top 10% of the class.
discussion comment
5 years ago
I was 18 too, I think the average age of the other guys at my club is around 40? I don't go around asking the other customers how old they are though lol.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
"If you get a diagnosis you’ll start learning how to properly care for yourself, and you’ll improve your functioning in the world."
That too, that's another big reason I've thought getting a diagnosis would be good. If I figure out exactly which perceptions are different I can learn what exactly I can do about it.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
One of the biggest reasons I actually want to get diagnosed is to finally get some answers. Being autistic isn't just one set of behaviors, there's a lot of different ways that people can be. I want to figure out what exactly are the things I'm perceiving differently.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
@CMI
My parents have suspected it for a long time because of the symptoms I've displayed and the fact that I end up forming a special kind of bond with every autistic person I've ever met but have refrained from getting an actual diagnosis because they didn't want people to treat me differently. My dad is kind of old fashioned and thinks that if you get diagnosed, people will forever not think of you as "CC99" but rather as "that autistic kid," and he didn't want me to have to live with a label. But, actually extremely recently, we've talked about actually getting me diagnosed, my mom wants to do it and I'm thinking that I should too. It could help with job interviews and explain why I might be a little awkward. I'm not far enough on the spectrum that its obvious I'm on it, but I'm enough on it that people have always thought I was weird.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
@SJG
I actually find your rants about various topics and propensity to take the most unusual stances as one of the most endearing aspects of your personality. Even if I don't agree with you, I still read it and go "yup that's SJG." But you haven't been around me in person, I don't know if you quite understand how difficult this year really was for me. I've had chronic depression for nearly three years now, I have to do something about it or it could kill me someday. My grades have already been permanently affected by this and I will never get those back, but I'm not at the point yet where I can't recover from this. But if I continue to choose inaction, that might not be the case for much longer.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
@NiceSpice
I finally sent an email to my mom actually two nights ago about going into therapy. For some reason it was really difficult to tell her exactly how I've been feeling this whole time. For some reason I try so hard to protect my parents from the truth. I don't tell them if I got into an accident, I censored the worst aspects of my alcohol poisoning last November, I keep trying to tell them things are mostly ok. They know I'm depressed but I try to make it seem like its not too bad. But your not the only one who has told me to go see a therapist.
We're looking into counselors for me to go see when my semester is finished and I return home.