Comments by Dougster (page 16)

@mark94: One little probably though: I told them rotate out to altcoins recently. I said get into BTC when it was around $2200. Said rotate out around $17000. Keep fishing @mark94. I am still 100x times smarter than you about the markets. (Not that that is hard!) LOL!

L1oydSchoene has his namesake down perfectly! In stitches!

Little georgie microbrain making a joke and it was actually funny? Amazing what the x-mas spirit will do.

@Trucidos: no. He is a complete faggot.

@SJG doing front room making out sessions with gay, psycho males eager to join his church.

@sjg: mind? Whoever told you you had one of those? Waiting to see evidence of it...

@SJG who was trying to show his technological adeptness recently by talking about his Turbo Pascal + DOS programming now implying he knows more about tech than others here? Yeah.... Okay. Good luck trying to get us to believe that.

@skibum609 is impervious to all things which are true, and only allows in his right wing whacko ideas. He is also a gay cocksucker but everybody already knew that. LOL!

"A major innovation of Cardano is that it will balance the needs of users with those of regulators, and in doing so combine privacy with regulation. " So will join DASH and RIPPLE in being something geared to not fighting the system too hard, to improvement its chance of adoption. I'll read about it, but probably not something I would invest in for just for reasons of principles.

joewebber: "Money for Nothing" Thought you were gonna say short treasuries.

How will it affect my crypto-currency profits?

@san_jose_guy is a gay cocksucker! LOL!

@Jack: got any studies to back up what you are saying?

It's very easy: just remember that RICH STUDs cannot get STDs. And, as we've learned if you pay hookers for sex you are a RICH STUD. RICH because you can afford to do it. STUD because you are having sex with a hot chick. RICH + STUD = RICH STUD immune from STDs.

@SJG except you admitted that you don't know enough about Bitcoin to decide if it's a ponzi scheme or not. Maybe learn a bit about a subject before trying to present yourself as an expert on it? Or is that just not how narcissists like you roll? Dumb fag.

Should reading that GBTC is trading around a 100% premium to NAV. How is this justified? If anyone can figure it out let me know, because I sure can't.

Meant next year. 2018. @joc13: the only way you get exposure through stock brokers is through ETFs like GBTC (trading at 100% NAV, so about impossible to justify) or stocks dealing blockchain which so far are pretty sketchy but rocketing in terms of price. I guess you could go with futures, but you'll have to meet their margin requirements for that, show you are willing to take on high speculative investments, and pass other tests that you would have the means to survive losses. Crypto-currency retirement investment is possible now, but that one even I won't touch. I'll stick to S&P index funds there.

@Burlington: next will decide it decided it for the lightning network. It started a testing phase recently.

@SJG is definitely a gay cocksucker!

1) That's a tricky one. I think a dominate crypto currency will emerge at most four or five dominate ones. For Bitcoin it all depends if they can pull off the lightning network or not. It seems like a very complex technical feat. If they pull it off, Bitcoin almost certainly dominates. Say $10trillion market cap. That would put the price around $350,000. If they can't pull off the lightning network then it's probably already overvalued. It fall very low maybe to $100 or so. So that's a bit of a difference $350k versus $100. :-) 2) People can deal with price instability via hedging instruments. Plus there are plenty of people out there who will lend you USD if you given them a faster appreciating asset as collateral, i.e. BTC, they might even be so lucrative that they would do this even in the face or short term price swings that caused paper losses. Also is that mass adoption itself increases liquidity which will decrease price fluctuations. Finally with institutional buyers showing up on the scene, they will probably what they do with stocks: hold for the long term and put effective short term bottoms in under the price. That will help with stability. Some people have speculate that central banks might even start buy crypto-currencies. Those are the ultimate deep pockets buyers to help put a floor under prices if they hold them on their balance sheets. (Laws would have to be passed to allow this in the US.)

Thanks for the info, @shailynn. I stand corrected!

You're responsible for your own backups. The public part of the blockchain is on thousands or millions of computers now, but your private keys are only wherever you put them.

I never endorse anyone doing a class 1 substance, but Molly is pretty much as harmless as it gets. Right down there with MJ. If another drug gets legalized/decriminalized I bet it will be that one first.

@SJG like I said shifting the power from the big banks back to the people. Supposedly a guy like you should be all for that? Or is your church really just about you thinking you'll finally get laid without having to pay (as I've maintained all along)?

There are undelete programs for most OSs that are pretty good. Main thing is not to mess that drive too much before you run then. But for the amount of money you are talking, the cost of the software is a good % of what you would recover. Might not even be worth sweating.