ATF is a term that I frequently hear bandied about. I'm curious how many visits that it took for you to find, and frequency of subsequent visits to maintain ATF? Weekly, monthly, quarterly?? Did you hit paydirt on very 1st visit, or after a year of multiple visits??
Myself, I don't give too much thought to term ATF. As I travel a lot, there are 8-10 clubs nationwide where I am at least fairly confident that I could walk in and have some dancer recognize me. There are a couple where I've been averaging monthly visits for over 5 yrs, some a sporadic 4-10 visits a year for over a decade, 1 where I managed 6 visits in recent 2 mo. period, and everything in between. I'm not always able, to, say , go to "regular" club the 2nd Tuesday of every month, but with random visits can get better diversity of dancers.
Thus dancers can move up or down on "depth chart" depending on new dancers that I meet on different days(and shifts). Your thoughts & experiences..........


The term ATF as used on this site is meaningless. Guys use it to refer to dancers they see alot in the club, but never outside the club, and whom they never fuck; dancers they (falsely) think they have a "relationship" with (because they have lunch or dinner with them); and dancers they fuck. To use one term to describe several completely different situations is foolish. We would all be better off not using the term ATF at all, and instead just accurately describing what is happening in plain, factual terms.
But a lot of guys here don't want to do that. Why? Because they want to obfuscate the reality of what is happening between them and the dancers -- which is largely "nothing". If they were honest (and especially, if they were honest with themselves), the guys would admit that with a lot of the dancers they never get any sex; they pay for a lot of dances that are "high contact" (which is a eupehmism for getting their cocks rubbed through their pants, or at best, a handjob); and while they would jump at the chance to fuck one of these girls, it often never happens.
I think a lot of guys use this term as a pseudo-expression to refer to some dancer they wish was their "girlfriend," but they know they can't really call her their girlfriend because they are paying her money (and she really thinks of him as her customer). I think the guys do this because they don't have girlfriends or wives in real life, and they use strippers as substitute girlfriends. (How many guys on this site are married and/or have a live in girlfriend? I bet it's a minority. And of the single guys, how many are getting laid even once a week? Again, I bet it's a minority. There's something wrong here.)
Personally, I think it's pathetic. If you cannot get a girlfriend in real life, you should not try to use sex workers as substitutes for girlfriends. And if a sex worker isn't your girlfriend, then you shouldn't fudge the issue by calling her your ATF.
There are stippers I regularly see in the clubs; there are strippers I have only seen a few times, but we've fucked in the club; and there is currently a stripper I fuck on a regular basis. But none of them are "girlfriends" and none of them are ATFs. They are strippers I pay for sex, and I am one of their customers. That's all. I don't kid myself into thinking there is more to the "relationship," and I don't want more, because I already have a wife, and don't want a girlfriend. And I don't want an ATF either.