The spending question again
rootman
I know we've discussed spending habits and it will vary by club, city and individual. But I just learned that I'm not the spender/tipper I thought I was. So the question now is, how much per MONTH do you guys allocate vs. per trip? I've been shelling out $300 every week, largely with the same girl which means I'm paying her rent plus. But there are others who have many more hundreds to spread around I guess. I'm not looking to be the biggest spender but thought I was providing good tips for superior (yes, sex included) service. Comments?
24 comments
I can say that among my SC-going friends, $100 per week amounts to over $5000 per year and none of my friends approach that level. We might go for a $500 "SC binge" once or twice a year, at most. I guess we would be more in the "beater" category.
IMHO if you are spending $300 per week, I would say you are in the top 1% of all strip club attendees -- but not necessarily very high up on the scale of people who post on this site, because I get the impression that a few of your fellow posters blow over $1000 a week on this hobby.
In my own case, SC spending probably averages $200 per month. Yes, I'm a cheapskate. Mostly tip-at-the-rail and occasionally buy a girl a drink. Speaking of buying a girl a drink, I am trying to learn to REFUSE to do that, and instead just offer to give her the cash equivalent of a drink. But try to stall for a little while to see if she considers me more of a human being to visit with, or a walking ATM. Her free choice, my free choice.
In your case, it sounds like you basically have used the clubs as a portal to have a regular sex-for-money relationship with a particular dancer. It also sounds like she might be pressuring you for more money. Whether you have an unreasonably good gig or not depends somewhat on the frequency and nature of the sex, IMHO. If you are getting essentially vanilla sex (intercourse, blow job, maybe DATY) once per week, and get to cum once, then I think $300 per week is pretty fair, depending on where you live. Do some escorts charge more (or less) per session? Sure, but you are both benefiting from the convenience of the deal. She is getting a reliable, regular customer, and you are getting a reliable, regular provider.
On the other hand, if for your $300 per week you are banging her 2 or 3 times per week, and/or you are getting higher range activity (anal, ATM, bdsm, roleplay, cumming on her face, etc., etc., you can use your imagination), then you are clearly getting a fantastic deal, and I can understand why she wants more money. I am not suggesting that you should spend more money. I am simply pointing out that in most locales (unless you have unbelievably good fortune), you are not going to get multiple sessions per week (or very high level sessions) for a mere $300 from a provider.
On the flip side, there are certainly women who will use their "relationship" to jack up the cost to ridiculous levels. I have heard of women who rake in thousands per month for a "sugar daddy" gig, where the guy is at most getting sex 2 or 3 times per month. That's ridiculous, and any guy in that kind of gig is getting ripped off (and he is probably being manipulated into thinking the relationship is a real one). You should go look at the "pink site" and read some of their threads on these types of ATF relationships -- they are pretty mercenary (e.g., bragging that they get paid $$$$ just to be arm candy, and that they won't even give the guy anything more than a peck on the cheek at the end of the date). Any guy spending that kind of money is clearly getting robbed blind. Again, I don't criticize the women for making a living any way they can, and a fool and his money are soon parted. But there's no reason to sign up to be a sucker.
Bottom line, I guess, is that I would increase the payments to her only if (a) you can easily afford it; and (b) you feel comfortable spending the money, i.e., you're getting good service and not just being ripped off; and (c) you don't think you can get a better or similar deal elsewhere. But I think if she's pressuring you for more money, you probably won't continue to get good service in the long run anyway, so it may be time to call it quits with her.
I have to say that I disagree with those post-ers who seem to equate strippers and escorts/hookers. The risk of getting involved with escorts is huge, from a legal standpoint. Most men would experience a substantial detrimental effect in their lifestyles (marriages/children/jobs/criminal status) if they got caught using escorts. When you go to a country in which prostitution is legal, or at least tolerated, you have no risk of legal complications. (I suppose San Francisco would fit in here too, since the prosecutor in that county has said that he is not going to prosecute private commercial sex between consenting adults).
Anyway, with the exception of a few "wild hairs", for the past six months or so, I have lived with minimal strip club visits, in return for (hopefully) quarterly trips to TJ. Next trip is in 2 1/2 weeks.
Ooops, don't tell them. :)
"If I were to begin clubbing again on a regular basis, I'd limit my spending to $50-60 per visit - that's all it would be worth to me now."
Then why do you spend so much time here droning on and on about your old ATF? Why not go out and see some pussy that dosen't have dust on it?
Generally strippers do not pay any income taxes. I have one favorite that bought a house for 175K. To qualify for the loan, she had to declare 65K a year in earnings and now must pay income taxes on that. That pissed her off. Join the crowd baby!