Quality of dancers: lower than in the 80s and 90s?
Wcoy
Florida
Could it be that the breastaurants are siphoning off the talent?
The clubs offer more bodily contact than they did in the old days. Could it be that the more attractive girls are repelled by this and seek other employment?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
46 comments
Latest
Doubtless there are many factors but I think a big factor is the rise of fentanyl and other opioids becoming mainstream as opposed to being confined to street junkies and outliers.
Not all but many strippers have used drugs over the years but the stuff available now is more dangerous and destructive which leads to the ones that survive having less care and interest in maintaining their looks, weight, hygiene, etc.
Once again, just my POV based off of my observations and experiences interacting with these women.
I don’t remember so many fat girls back in the 80s & 90s.
I’m an ass-man myself - but I prefer my 70’s high school classmates over most dancers today with bad boob jobs, blue hair, sleeve tattoos, nose rings, tongue studs and paunchy guts.
Give me a girl who appreciates dancing to Head East instead of Post Malone
I believe him, and that is where the hottest talent has gone. Work from home, no contact, no catty co-workers or bodily fluids, less chance of someone from the neighborhood. I just had no idea there was that much money in it. His son works in construction sales, making between $70-$80 now, and into six figures once he builds his client book. Not a section 8 ghetto or low rent neighborhood.
There are many factors, but I do think the recession had a huge and negative impact in dancer quality. Clubs were struggling because the economy was struggling, girls became more desperate (extras became more rampant), and more "average" looking girls turned to stripping to make money. Are the clubs going to be super picky at that point, when girls are literally paying THEM to work there?
The payment issues (house fee / tipout) are another thing that lowered the standards. In the 80s and 90s, the clubs paid an hourly wage to the dancers (at my mom's main club she got $17/hr plus whatever tips she took home... another older dancer I worked with worked at a smaller club back in the day and told me she got $14/hr).
So, if the club is employing you and putting you on a payroll, naturally they are going to be more selective. Now that it's the opposite, where girls pay the clubs, talent has dropped.
Those are just some reasons, but there are plenty more. Also, Americans just keep getting fatter in general. So basically today, any "average" girl can be a stripper at a decent club, whereas a few decades ago, you basically had to look like you could be in Playboy.
I don’t remember a lot of fat young people in general before the internet and since the pandemic it seems like these kids don’t really do anything that doesn’t include a screen. I happen to agree with you that standards have become pathetic. I attribute the lack of standards to the generation of people raised to believe they were entitled to a participation trophy, and now it appears that participation, if it requires any effort on their part, is nonexistent.
That's 30 to 40 years ago. Of course, we were all much younger then. It's possible that as we age, our "taste" in women changes. So 30 to 40 years ago the younger men may have thought the girls were pretty while the older men back then may have wished the girls looked like the girls from 30 to 40 years earlier.
I recently looked though an old high school yearbook. And the pretty, early 80s girls looked as pretty as ever to me, even though hairstyles and fashion have certainly changed. But when I look at a yearbook from a decade before, I wonder why the cheerleaders and homecoming court looked so unattractive. I think memories of our younger days color our perceptions.
I think we also remember the good stuff and forget the bad. This keeps us (moderately) sane and (somewhat) productive. I have some fond memories of past club trips where all the girls were hot. I also know that those trips were not that common, just like now. But I have forgotten the details of those subpar visits. Another thing to cloud our memories.
Easy access to porn also colors our perception. I've been going to clubs for 30 years and back then, porn viewing involved a trip to a video store. Now I can see whatever type of hot chick I like in the moment from my phone. This competition between 1000s of porn chicks and the few dancing at my local club right now unfairly clouds my perception. How can five average-strippers compete against porn pros?
Lastly, preferred styles of hair, makeup, clothes and body type do change over time. Like a pendulum they swing from one extreme to another. Thick is in now (and I am learning to appreciate it more) but some dancers are pushing the extreme into the obese area. After all, more people are more fat now. Including myself. I do hope the pendulum starts to swing back soon.
Motorhead, Have actually ever seen a stripper dance to Head East? And if so was she "Flat as a Pancake"?
2. Lip injections run amok are lesser to the natural lip
3. landing strips
4. Much Less tattoos as I remember
5. Danced to motley crew and AC/DC
6. Less regulation, VIP was ground zero
Regarding the onlyfans models, some of them will still offer p4p. $500, or $1000 for an hour is still major money to them as even the big OF models will be charging $10 or $15 for a months VIP. I know one escort who charges $500 an hour, but she only has a small number of subscribers. I cant remember if it was in the hundreds or thousands.
I dont think the sedentary behavior has anything to do with the widespread fatness. If your metabolism and diet is good you can sit around all day and still be lean. The super fat people you see nowadays are a result of chemicals in the food/water supply, and/or too many pharma drugs or vaccines.
Just antibiotics and antidepressants alone, will cause fat gain without actually eating any additional calories. Theres other substances that can cause fat loss without eating less calories. Things like caffeine, maybe small dosages of b vitamins, thyroid hormone, anabolic drugs, etc.
So what I mostly see in clubs now is compared in my mind against those perceptions of perfect women, and the reality is that only a very few current dancers match up, at least in my perception. I also blame the whole Kardashian enhanced fat ass trend of the last decade. Not a fan. Give me a perfectly shaped college coed ass with a nice rack, perfectly curled thick hair, beautiful face and smile, little ink, no metal, a cute landing strip, and a fun flirty personality, and she will get my money.
Gen Z is also a smaller generation then those before it. Maybe not as many strippers coming out of there. Could be a factor.
Depends what your into to. Demographic change is real. For example if your into black or white girls in Los Angeles, it might be a little more difficult to find what your looking for then say 20 years ago. A lot of places are changing. For better or worse again depends on your tastes.
I think the permits discouraged girls from giving it a shot or coming and going. Some wouldn’t have liked it and moved on but some would have stuck around. There are still some good ones though.
When I was in my 20s all me and my buddies thought about was getting laid - quantity and quality. Not now.
In the times of low contact, I think dancers made less money per PL. Given typical Boomer preferences, dancing was probably the most lucrative for dancers like PSD, who were glamorous as well as beautiful. PSD is probably glamorous right when she jumps out of bed in the morning. But, for most women, if requires a lot of effort, accepting restricted options in expressing one's self in one's appearance, and perhaps scary amounts of plastic surgery. And, truth to be told, it's much easier to be perceived as glamorous if you are white.
In general, and in most ways, we probably know the real personalities of the strippers who post on TUSCL, more than we do the ones we get dances from. When I read blah's, PSD's, nicespice's, Nina's, BY's posts, I see people who get it that it's boring af if you don't speak from your own thoughts (implying you have some) and experiences. Rather than being a human parrot. My definition of good personality.
Yeah I do see girls wearing completely the wrong sizes and I'm like why?? Sure a lot of us buy stuff online but if it is that unflattering don't even leave the dressing room in that shit. Turn around and sell or give it away lol. This is just common sense.
I think a lot of chicks stay single cuz they aren't trying to fuck for free or be in fake relationships where a guy has literally nothing or little more to offer besides sex which we monetize or at least the idea of it. Like why the fuck do I wanna look cute for some dude for free that's just a dbag trying to tell any lie in the world or get me high/drunk to fuck like nah lol. Here's also another reason to get fkd up alone or around friends. Not too long ago I tried Tinder and multiple guys wanted me to try Vegan food??? Like bro please the fuck is that?? Give me smoked Brisket then leave
I also want to weigh in on this treacherous question of glamor and race. Just to note to @blahblah that what @ilbbaicnl said was that it's "EASIER to be PERCEIVED as glamorous if you are white" (which I agree with), which is different that how you formulated it, "nonwhite chicks aren't less glamorous" (which I also agree with). I think both yous are right about this.
That doesn't mean I always find someone I'm willing to take to a room, but I'm also not ruminating over how the grass was greener in the '80s.
Seems to me there were attractive girls then, and attractive girls now, albeit with lots more tattoos.
location:
tel:
age: 50's
ethnicity: asian, white, or latin
cost: 80-150
description: looks good for her age. some parts sag.
that's fuckng insane!!!!