Did you ever think you'd see the day when you'd see even American politicians be
Muddy
USA
pro-terrorist? Some WILD takes out there this past week. I can't say I'm surprised in the least bit but when I step back and think how quick this country turned and the direction it's going in, yeah it's all pretty stunning how fast it all went.
80 comments
Anywho, during the 70s, 80s, and 90s, several US politicians (local and national) openly supported the Irish Republican Army (IRA) and participated in Sinn Fein fundraising.
After the Lockerbie bombing, a lot of that money went directly to a willing Libya. Libya supplied the IRA with guns, munitions, and access to Libyan guerilla combat training camps. That training and armaments killed a lot of innocent people in Northern Ireland, Ireland, London, and other parts of England.
And if you keep going back, you'll find other examples of US politicians (from both sides of the aisle) forming alliances with groups that could easily be labeled terrorists, or worse.
https://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-re…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_i…
So this isn't a new thing or a sudden turn. But the good news is that your conservative CJKent shtick is coming along nicely.
What is happening to Israel is horrible, but it's not a black swan event signaling that we should collectively clutch our pearls.
And, yeah, I get it. This thread will soon be loaded down with posters who love their performative partisan politics (some are already here...). Have fun with that.
I disagree with"
I support Israel but Bibi is corrupt and a terrible leader.
Then do more, and stop extrapolating fringe views to be representative of the majority. Widen your news consumption beyond NY Post.
Sometimes refusing to comment is just as bad. Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib refused to make a comment or condemnation about Hamas beheading babies.
I will play along and comment on your discussion.
Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence and fear to achieve economic, political and ideological gains.
The term is used to refer to violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants mostly civilians, women, children and elderly people.
America is from its founding the Largest Terrorist Organization in modern history.
From the genocide against Native Nations in America and all over the world, the destruction of other peoples lives and homes in the most violent way.
“Under the crust of that portion of Earth called the United States of America—"from California . . . to the Gulf Stream waters"—are interred the bones, villages, fields, and sacred objects of American Indians. They cry out for their stories to be heard through their descendants who carry the memories of how the country was founded and how it came to be as it is today.”
~ Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States
Anti Israel comments have some history in that they haven’t treated the Palestinians well. That’s not really in dispute. Where it is prone to exaggeration and misleading arguments is where people use Palestinians interchangeably with Hamas or Hezbollah. They are not the same and to make broad sweeping generalizations is ignorant.
2-bits, This really begs the age old question around “you and what army?” I hear that a lot amongst people who claim their local sports team is an extension of their real life, associating the efforts of the team to one’s personal arm chair tactics from their television. I digress. What I wonder is what the fuck that faggit Roger Waters from Pink Floyd is telling his followers about this conflict? Is he still denying the Israel occupation? I will never buy one single item that contributes to Roger Waters gain with his anti-Israel stance, and as far as I’m concerned nobody else should, too.
Fucking moron I don’t know what’s wrong with you but you need to seek help.
~ Adolf Hitler
~ der Führer und Reichskanzler
BOY WAS I WRONG. WOW DUDE.
BLM has issued statements in support of Hamas and celebrating the attack.
At least 31 student groups at Harvard have issued statements in support of Palestine.
For the actual event itself, Israel has an absolute right to defend itself. However, there were a series of missteps going back to the beginning of the century that led to this. Hamas should have never been allowed to take control of the Palestinian Authority. We have an equally dangerous domestic situation in the US with socialists and communists taking over our government, but Israel and the UN should have moved in immediately to displace Hamas before they assumed power and implemented an administrative governance.
After Saturday, there are no easy answers. Is Israel at war with Gaza, Palestine, or Hamas? How should the IDF respond to human shields (already answered)? They are creating new generations of Hamas and Hezbollah with every dead civilian. What should be done with the Palestinian population and the Gaza Strip after Israel has finished with Hamas? Should they remain a fundamentally Jewish state and exclude certain faiths from governance? Is that compatible with all citizens of Israel (Christian, Jew or Muslim/Palestinian or Israeli) deserving fair and equal participation in selecting their government? There are no easy answers and Hamas should be mercilessly destroyed, but with what level of collateral damage?
Watching the Israeli attacks on Gaza, I am reminded of Nietzsche's most popular quote: "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you."
And stupid as well, your statements constantly show all here the depth of your ignorance
It is never been about the Jews vs Palestinians…
In the war that followed the foundation of the “State of Israel” on May 14, 1948 some 700,000 Palestinians, half the Arab population of what was British-ruled Palestine, fled or were driven from their homes, ending up in Jordan, Lebanon and Syria as well as in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
NOTE: “BRITISH-RULED PALESTINE”
“More like 0.1% of regular ass humans tricking the rest of us into fighting among ourselves while they rob us blind.”
~ SanchoRG, Texas
~ Nov, 2021
Bernie Sanders, 10/11/23
Part of what makes fighting terrorism so hard is they don't fight fair.
Publicly - the principle is to leave no one behind. But I can’t help but to think they may become a casualty of war. The big picture may outweigh the lives of 150 souls.
Good for them.
I’m not saying it’s a solvable issue or that the rules of war are clear. They aren’t. To use a biblical (or is it code of Hammurabi?) reference I’m wary of an “eye for an eye” justification of leveling Gaza. Hamas needs to be eradicated. The fact that they hide behind innocents does not absolve the IDF from considering innocent casualties. Much of the rhetoric talks about turning Gaza to glass or flattening it. That’s not helpful.
we neuter dogs and cats out of care do we not?
I’m going to give you some food for thought, I represent over seventy five cousins grand parents, uncles and aunts whom I’ve never met because my Grandma as a 12 year old child in 1902 was sent to live with her sister in NYC from Estonia, after a pogrom destroyed my great grandfather’s farm and factory, not long afterward WWI began and no one was able to get out, then shortly after WWI ended Adolph Hitler started his Brown shirts a few years after that the Nazis started their slaughter you might have heard of it, it was called the Shoach (Holocaust)
So what sympathy do you expect me to have for those animals that wiped out my family
Do you have any idea how many families have been affected by this barbarism in a so called civilized society.
Yeah - I saw that. Some are even going so far as to say “this is the beginning of the end of wokism”.
I’m not sure it’s to that point yet - but these same firms that were throwing wads of cash at BLM a few years ago are now pulling in the reigns.
You "represent"? Doubtful, I'm sure they would have disowned you a looong time ago.
Palestinian children living in Gaza had NOTHING to do with your sad little history as you described it, but you advocate genocide to somehow have two wrongs make what right exactly?
Israel and Palestine didn't even exist until the 50s or 60s. What illogic has your demented mind used to make that relevance?
@mates with his imaginary wife
go fuck yourself you’re as stupid as Gamma nu
who uses a sorority name as a handle
@ the 12 year old wanna be sorority girl.
Israel was established in 1948 that’s when the UN partitioned the British colony of Palestine the Arabs that called themselves Palestinians were originally Jordanians but being 12 you’d never know that and they had their own state.
One last point to anyone that wants to look it up there has been a constant Jewish presence in Judea and Samaria since before the pyramids were built, way before the Romans ever settled int the city of seven hills called Rome, Jerusalem is called the city of King David anyone here know when the city of Jerusalem was established?
Hint before there were Christians and Moslems, you guys really need to learn some history it’s obvious mate and gammanu don’t know history for sure but they sure like to tell everyone how little they know
Amazing to me that idiots spout off on a strip club board and display their utter stupidity.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2AzAFqrxfe…
How sad for them.
Drunk that’s a personal choice but you’re too cheap to spend more than a dollar or two so of course you only drink whatever you can get from the trash can
And stupid I sincerely doubt that anyone here can match you for sheer stupidity
LOL
Something I think that is new is widespread public support for the terrorists. There have been demonstrations with thousands of people, statements from professors and student groups, a large list of celebrities, in support of the terrorists cause. In a recent Harvard Harris poll 50% of people under 35 said that the terrorist attacks were justified. Yes, they condone terrorist attacks.
Some of the politicians statements have been along the lines of "I condemn the Hamas attacks, BUT what about Israeli blah blah"
Whichever side killed more people, and stole more land or private property is obviously the more evil side. It doesnt really matter what anyones intent or reason for doing it was. If a serial killer kills someone because of racism it doesnt make him better or worse than someone who killed because of sexism or poverty or boredom or etc
So youre arguing if one person or entity kills more people and steals more than the other entity, they can somehow… be less evil?
This is basic grade school math… 10 is greater than 1. Are you typing from prison?
Allies were less evil than Axis.
Union was less evil than Confederacy.
US forces in Mogadiahu were less evil than the warlords.
Coalition were less evil than Saddam in 1991.
BLM and ANTIFA are terrorists, and they were widely supported by the democrat party.
Moneyman00
2 hours ago
Lol loser. Youre claiming killing more people is less evil than killing less people? Why arent your parents walking around with bleeding asses in prison
Im not sure what you’re talking about. Its a really simple concept. Whichever entity, person, or side kills more people , is the more evil side.
I havent looked in depth at the different historical battles you mentioned. But lets look at one example.
Youre claiming the Union killed more than the confederacy? Then they may very well have been the worse side. Its a fairly simple equation. If your side or team or whatever you want to call it, had 1000 people killed, and your side then kills many thousands of the other side, who in that scenario is worse? Obviously the one who killed more. Its not really something to debate or negotiate or go back and forth on its basic sense, basic morals.
So even looking at Hitler or whichever battle you want to bring up. If Hitler killed 6 million, then in response another entity kills 50 million, its pretty clear what the worse side is. Even if they were avenging the deaths on their side, vengeance doesnt really mean you can wipe out an entire race or country or etc.