Filters are annoying, misleading, and unnecessary . Girls certainly look more normal IRL. It's a case-by-case basis regarding whether IG is better or worse than IRL.
It's a mixed bag. Many look better on IG where they control the lighting and angles & select the one good shot from dozens of takes. Some look stupid on IG, overloaded with filters that distort their shape and smooth their skin. There's a few who don't photograph well or don't fret too much about having a "bad" picture on their IG who look better in real life. Oddly enough, it's pretty rare what's in IG actually matches what you see in real life.
I've been following some strippers recently that look hot on IG. Saw a few of them in their club for the first time recently and was disappointed in their appearance IRL.
I follow very few dancers on IG or FB but the ones that I do Follow look the same to me in person. All but one of them just use amatuer photography. I only know of one the does professional shoots and she just looks the same in person. Gorgeous!
IG is a lie on top of all the other lies... makeup hair, heels, duck lips, push up bras, "me so horny", etc etc. At some point you're only getting 2% of the actual girl, but if that 2% is tits and ass, who cares!
When the dancer uses so many filters she looks like an anime sculpture, that's not great. Many models are smart about using phone-based photo editors like Snapseed or Lightroom to smooth out some rough edges without looking like 1980s CGI.
It's rare, but I occasionally encounter a dancer who doesn't realize that she'd look better on IG with less photo manipulation. Of course, it's a minefield trying to explain that to a dancer.
12 comments
Almost like false advertising.
It's rare, but I occasionally encounter a dancer who doesn't realize that she'd look better on IG with less photo manipulation. Of course, it's a minefield trying to explain that to a dancer.