Hot strippers could flood the business - if economy kicks down
Tuesday, January 8, 2008 9:25 PM
I have cited Xdamage's comments today (from stripperweb) as background, because they form the underlying basis to my comments.
One could argue the inverse of the premise posted in the topic heading above, however I'm reverting to a "survival of the fittest" alternative as being the most likely scenario. Personally I think it will be alot of hot new dancers working even harder than dancers typically work work today, making strip clubs a true alternate reality world and unique again and having the power to at least keep the foot traffic numbers up -even if many patrons cannot afford dances.
For any customers still having cash, while no one wants a recession, its probably going to be good news for the strip club customers still able to afford this hobby.
In theory one could argue that less spending by typical customers means less dancers making large amounts of money - thereby means less hot women entering the stripping field, but in fact a recession would also mean less opportunities for these same women in regular (non-stripping) jobs in the normal world. Now obviously customers cannot spend what they don't have, but the customer base does vary, including new groups of customers in varying quantities at various times, some with money and some without, however currently I do think that having so many 6 or lower women working in the profession in recent years has demotivated customers from not only spending but sometimes from even going to clubs in the first place. Why go to a club if half the dances (e.g on a bad day) look like the average young women at Walmart? Strip club owners have let many low (dancer) quality women into the profession simply because they have a pulse and will pay the house fees. However that shortterm strategy can only work so long, and strip clubs will not be able to attract and hold even new customers if they continue on that track.
They've got to keep customer traffic either going up or figure a way to minimize any declines - if for anything just to keep selling those overpriced drinks, which obviously are highly profitable given the fact bartenders and waitresses are not a major overhead item for clubs.
If one believes we are on the doorstep of a major recession as I do (in part simply because they are first unavoidable, and second, booms create busts -and since we had a massive real estate boom fueled by a credit bubble, some portion of the flip side is inevitable) and if one adds in other specialized factors relative to the exotic dancing profession such as low entry barriers (no special qualifications, investment, or training required), ongoing decreasing stigma about stripping, flexible hours, low taxes and so forth - you could see how women born with great beauty are increasingly going to be at least looking at this field.
BACKGROUND (quoting xdamage, today 1-08-08, pink site (blue side), General Discussion "Whats with the attitude")
BEGIN QUOTE
I guess I think the sense of entitlement is more of a symptom of social changes more so than the cause, but to be clear, I think the entitlement mindset is not something that happened in one generation in our society. It's an evolving mindset that is intimately tied up with a relatively long period of prosperity (relatively speaking as compared with other periods of history and other societies), and our society that values freedom of expression and places a lot of focus on individual happiness. If our society was to go through a major economic depression the mindset could change fairly fast.
Regarding working together as a group not being a factor in the past. I think you can't compare the past with the present. Things have changed. It wasn't a factor in the past because dancers were rarities. These days with so many girls entering the industry for fast easy money, it is a factor. It's just like nature. If there are a few animals competing for abundant resources then they don't need to work together. But if there are many animals competing for limited resources their choices are work together, or compete hard, and it is survival of the fittest.
And I really don't believe they are capable of working together. There is no professional standards applied to stripping because any girl with no training, no skills, and no accountability can enter the industry. She just needs to be willing, and reasonably attractive. No school is required. No big money is at stake (e.g., like a model who works for a client who has a lot at stake when running an advertising campaign; or an athlete working for a sports team that has a multi-hundred million dollar a year budget and expectations of profits).
Without some type of motivator to work together, I think you'll just see good old survival of the fittest mentality where the fittest are much like what we see today:
o Exceptionally physically hot.
o Those willing to do more for less.
o Exceptionally good at the psychological aspects of convincing men to spend on them.
And I expect to see even more women entering the industry as time goes on as the stigma about stripping decreases. The pie will be cut even thinner. The lure of fast, easy money, low accountability, flexible hours, no training required, feelings of "empowerment" related to sexuality and controlling males, etc., suggests more women will be entering and competing for limited resources.
Who knows ... eventually the US stripper market may end up like Amsterdam where strip clubs are now nearly non-existant, replaced by inexpensive prostitution, live dildo/sex shows, champagne clubs that also offer live sex/dildo shows, etc. The only difference is in Amsterdam the current generation of 20 somethings doesn't think there is anything abnormal about this state of affairs. This is just the way it is. Paying $20 for a low contact dance in a SC ... haha, why would anyone do that
END QUOTE
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
20 comments