More consistent ratings.
Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:00 AM
A kid who just visited his first strip club will almost surely over rate the club. Even seasoned hobbyists often give skewed ratings.
For example, I always appreciate dennyspade's practical and informative reviews, but he just rated AllStars in McCook, IL as an 8. I like AllStars too and try to visit whenever I'm in the area. However, there is no stage show, girls range from 5 - 8, and they are fully clothed with pantyhose. Even considering the extraordinary value of their $5 lapdances, on a national scale there is no way that this club rates an 8. Even BabyDolls in its heyday should not have rated more than a 9 because it is topless only. I don't buy into the idea of rating a club high because it good for its area. This is a national board.
I recently gave the same club a questionably high 7 rating. However, using my rating system readers could tell that it was a very low 7 and that it earned the rating at least partially on the basis of value.
The value part is important to many of us. The 10 ratings often come from you guys that happily pay $300 for a VIP experience. I am one of the top 25 posters on Tuscl but I can't remember ever spending more than $100, and I think that is far too much to spend even for a happy ending.
I am surprised that my rating system or something like it has not caught on:
Facility Quality: 7
Dancer Quality: 7
Private Dance Quality: 6
Mood: 6
Value: 7
Avg Rating: 6.6
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
43 comments