Classic case of futility of Pink site
David9999
This is actually under the blue portion (STRIP CLUB JUNKIE, shop talk) under the title "No more S.C's for me" Note the poster uses the word "majority" not the word ALL
ORIGINAL POST on Oct 3, 2007
I have seen the light. I've been going to South and Central America for work going on about 6 months now and have been getting involved in the adult entertainment down there for the last 2 months. I am now completely jaded to the US strip-clubs.
Between the outrageous prices being charged for entry, drinks, dances, C.R. etc. and the rudeness ,sense of entitlement and lack of appreciation that I experience from a majority of the U.S. strippers, I've decided to completely cut my self off and spend my time and my money at these foriegn locals. I get so much more at a fraction of the price and the girls genuinely appreciate it and treat me great. It's harder to get there than the local S.C. but even with airfare and hotel figured in for me it's a no brainer. If anyone would like more info. please feel free to pm me.
END POST
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
21 comments
This just pervades all aspects of the male-female interaction in North America. I think for me this boils down all the issues into a single manageable one expression.
"poverty doesn't make a lady more genuine. plenty of south american women come work in america because they loathe the fact that guys come to their countries for 'cheaper' sexually based services. so they come to america and collect american-sized pay instead, often from guys just like you who think foreign=more 'honest', 'nice', and 'genuine'.
also, it's prejudiced because it means you buy into some goofy ass notion that foreign women 'like it' more or 'wanna do it anyway' and therefore deserve smaller sums anyhow. i.e., that they deserve cheaper pay because they (to you) loooove entertaining you and would practically do it for free!
bleh. bleh. ptui."
(end quote)
american chicks just love spreading that hate
It has been a long time since I visited the Pink site and my main objection was just the mods. Whether it be on the blue portion of the site or elsewhere. It is difficult for me to understand dancers being so wimpy given their job.
Of course, even there I met women who I thought would provide excellent value assuming I could afford them. OTOH, could be even the nasty ones can do a good job. Some dancers have very different personalities outside the club--some better some worse, but definitely different.
With any luck ($$$ and health), finally got the old passport, I will visit Haiti and see if the women are worth the travel. Given a choice between European (from the east) women and American, I would choose American hands down.
Quote as follows:
"Dude, at the risk of repeating myself, Just don't go!
You pretty much ignored my point about the REAL difference between American clubs and South American clubs but I'm assuming that you are not denying my comparison.
I hope you enjoy yourself down there but be sure and come back here and post the first time you get ripped-off by one of your girls.
And PLEASE, don't start lifting quotes from the pink side to post here in order to support your argument. The SW is locker room talk for the ladies and really has no business being transplanted.
ORIGINAL POSTER on Oct 3rd
"Between the outrageous prices being charged for entry, drinks, dances, C.R. etc. and the rudeness ,sense of entitlement and lack of appreciation that I experience from a majority of the U.S. strippers, I've decided to completely cut my self off and spend my time and my money at these foriegn locals."
CHIEF ASS-KISSER'S POST YESTERDAY
"Well, OK, but that's not anywhere near the way you started this thread. So if by "let's try this again" you mean let's not condemn every stripper north of Mexico City as a cold hearted money grubbing bitch then I guess I can agree with your above statement....but that's not what you said 61 posts ago."
Mirriam-Webster's definition of the word MAJORITY
"a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total"
Mirriam-Webster's definition of the word EVERY
"being each individual or part of a group without exception"
David, did you mean the OP did a good job of self-defense over there at SW? I found that it was utterly pointless to try to do so. They ignored what you said, no matter how accurate or intelligent. Just blithely skated right over it ... zoom. (Kind of like I'm going to do with Yoda from now on out.)
Talk or discuss at Pink site? Moderators allow that? LOL! Times do change, but that would be a big change. Many of those dancers are so sensitive it is difficult to imagine them being able to service any male no matter how pussy whipped he is.
For whatever it's worth I think the nasty ones are actually the minority although it definitely doesn't seem like it. It is that principle where a bunch of liberals gather together or conservatives gather together the views of the group become more extreme than that of the individual members. I don't recall why that supposedly is the case, but it was interesting.
.
There are a couple dancers on the Pink site that I would most likely go completely crazy over based on the way they looked first and foremost, and the way they communicated and their belief system, secondly.
.
Anyway, heaven forbid talking about the strippers or their web site on a site about strip clubs and the strip club culture. I mean if a little lady or ladies gets upset the world has to come to a blanking end until she gives the ok signal.
Jablake makes a very valid point about the group often becoming more extreme than the individuals who comprise it. I think it's the difference between the abstract generality and the common specific exception. For example, they talk endlessly about it's all about the money, that strippers never actually like their customers. And yet I remember a thread several years ago where a stripper was saddened by the death of an old regular and lots of other girls chimed in about how much they really liked some old guy and how upset they'd be if he died. Had nothing to do with money. Yet no one noted this obvious contradiction.
Oh, I'll concede, that's technically not a fair representation of what should be either "left" or "right" in politics, but it IS what the parties tend to represent now'days. The women there like telling other people what to do in those other people's bedrooms, and what skin color those other people ought to have. That's about as Republican as it gets.
An independent reviewer reading the transcript would have to conclude the original poster responded in detail to nearly every point brought up by the opposing side.
The OP also failed to go personal despite being called (among other things) a "cheap whoremonger"