Member on a Power Trip - (maybe trying to compensate for something)
623
Since 1963 ...
Here is a review that clubber (big surprise) rejected.
Maybe it’s time to consider limiting the “right to reject” power of some users? Maybe only allowing any member to reject a limited number of reviews each day or month would be in order.
The Downer
July 25, 2019
2
Came here with a few buddies on a Friday night around 10pm. It was during Canada Day Long weekend so expecting it to be rammed. $20 cover charge that night which gets you a wristband good for Seductions next door. They make you go through a metal detector and the bouncers search you at the door for weapons and contraband. Could be a good or bad sign depending how you look at it.
Anyway, we were lucky to grab a seat in the back corner as this place gets rammed pretty fast. There were 2 bachelor parties going on that night from what I could see. Waitress came and took our order right away. TIP: do not drink the shots in those test tubes...they are watered down juice with little or no alcohol in it. The shooter girl was very persistent and aggressive all night..very annoying.
The majority of girls were hot with some not so much. However there is definitely something for every taste. The lapdances cost $20 and they take you to 1 of 2 VIP areas. Touching is allowed and they're fully nude.
Around midnight the place was getting crowded so we walked over to Seductions. This place on the other hand was not crowded at all and we only counted maybe 8 girls. Had a beer and went back to the downer. Unfortunately we were not able to get a seat for the rest of the night.
Overall a good night.
Friday After Midnight
25-99
$100-$300
Club6
Dancers8
Dollar Value7
Review Publishers
PrimetimeSchein
sctripper
King_Gambrinus
mikeym
ClubberNot Enough Details
Few club details.
You need to read the following about writing a review:
www.tuscl.net
Review Comments
Maybe it’s time to consider limiting the “right to reject” power of some users? Maybe only allowing any member to reject a limited number of reviews each day or month would be in order.
The Downer
July 25, 2019
2
Came here with a few buddies on a Friday night around 10pm. It was during Canada Day Long weekend so expecting it to be rammed. $20 cover charge that night which gets you a wristband good for Seductions next door. They make you go through a metal detector and the bouncers search you at the door for weapons and contraband. Could be a good or bad sign depending how you look at it.
Anyway, we were lucky to grab a seat in the back corner as this place gets rammed pretty fast. There were 2 bachelor parties going on that night from what I could see. Waitress came and took our order right away. TIP: do not drink the shots in those test tubes...they are watered down juice with little or no alcohol in it. The shooter girl was very persistent and aggressive all night..very annoying.
The majority of girls were hot with some not so much. However there is definitely something for every taste. The lapdances cost $20 and they take you to 1 of 2 VIP areas. Touching is allowed and they're fully nude.
Around midnight the place was getting crowded so we walked over to Seductions. This place on the other hand was not crowded at all and we only counted maybe 8 girls. Had a beer and went back to the downer. Unfortunately we were not able to get a seat for the rest of the night.
Overall a good night.
Friday After Midnight
25-99
$100-$300
Club6
Dancers8
Dollar Value7
Review Publishers
PrimetimeSchein
sctripper
King_Gambrinus
mikeym
ClubberNot Enough Details
Few club details.
You need to read the following about writing a review:
www.tuscl.net
Review Comments
35 comments
A - review described the club well (coats, etc) and the vibe (good mileage, friendly dancers, etc) - reading the review I feel I know the club
B - pretty-good - gave me an idea of what the club is about but leaves me with a few unanswered questions
C - has some useful details but has a lot of info missing for me to be able to get a good grasp on the club
D - very generic with very few details - review can qlapply to any club in America - or the review just talks about the reviewer's fave and nothing else
F - really doesn't give a shit about writing a review and just put minimal info to get VIP
I will approve A-C reviews - some 'C' reviews I may not approove or I may just abstain from voting.
As to the OP's suggestion to limit a user's ability to reject reviews, I'm against that. Although both Clubber and Desertscrub are notorious 'rejectors', there are far more users who will approve any review, including those that are obviously written to get VIP access.
I likely would have published this review. On the minus side, would have liked to see a more detailed dancer profile, and a description of how comfortable and private the VIP areas were. On the pus side, he did a good job at capturing 2 nuanced details (metal detector at entry, watered down shots with annoying shot girl). On the balance, a C plus on the Papi grading system.
Can we make the Papi grading scale a sticky post ?
In any case, I don't see what the problem is. One member thought it didn't have enough details, he voted not to publish it. 4 others thought it did, so they voted to publish it. It was published. Are you butthurt because his opinion doesn't match yours? Or because you can now see the comments people leave?
Clubber and Minnow are fucking idiots that think every review should be a dear penthouse novella. It's almost like they are downvoting reviews that they cant jack off to.
GOOD
- mentions dance cost - I like getting lots of dances I like to be clear going in how much the dances are
- mentions the club gets crowded - lets me know it's a popular club thus probably a good/well-liked club - lets me know I may not wanna get their too-late
- mentions admission is good for the club next door
- kinda describes the dancer-crew
The combo of it being a popular club and with mostly hot dancers makes me think it's one of the better clubs
BAD
- would've liked a better breakdown of the dancer-vrew as a whole other than "most are hot" since hot can mean different things ti different PLs
anything less than 69 fails.
It balances out.
Nope, he didn't - should have been rejected.
Plus - how do I know if the bathrooms work the same way in Canada as in the US? SMH.
Papi I need to know if the troll hands out paper towels
Perhaps rather than a pass/fail grade, each user scores the review on a scale (1-5,1-10, whatever). If the review gets published, then the review's overall grade is viewable to VIP members along with a list of users that did the grading.
What constitutes a passing score or grade is up to founder.
That said, I think you're still going to have users that consistently pass or flunk nearly everything by default. But perhaps this blunts their impact.
With any voting process there will always be those thst are not happy with the outcome.
Now that TUSCLers are approving reviews, we should expect that not everyone will agree that a review is acceptable. We have different standards. I don't think a person's motives or character should be questioned.
If someone sincerely believes a review should be rejected, then we should respect his opinion. Only if someone were rejecting reviews out of personal grievance or some other unfair reason would we be justified in limiting that person's power.
Clubber's judgement is only one of many. If enough other people approve the review it will still be published.
What we need is the ability to see who is currently logged-in to the site.
Clubber and DesertScrub are logged in = Shit, I think I'll wait to publish.
MickeyM is logged in - Cool, I get one up-vote almost automatic.
MickeyM is logged in - Cool, I get one up-vote almost automatic.
—
TUSCL quote of the day
Still when grading submissions, have no idea who the person is,or whether it's the persons first, or 200th review, they get graded on their stand alone merits.
I wish Founder would chime in as to if the above review meets his minimal standard. Would put the issue to bed going forward.
I don't recall that particular review (couldn't find it, no club location), but doesn't appear I rejected it. Normally a review like this I will approve, but still comment that it is not up to the TUSCL standards set by founder.
This was far from a stellar review but I think it provided some basic info about the prices and lapdance expectations as well as helpful info about security, watered down shots and overcrowding. That's pretty much what I look for in a review, some basic info about what to expect in terms of dances and pricing with some info about possible downsides to the club.
That's why it is a consensus. That will still allow marginal "reviews" to be published, but if everyone felt that way no need having a vote as all would be approved.
You must read some that get approved that are meaningless even now.