Someone help me plz I'm on the bus and ...
future POTUS and Senator in training
Retired Queen Troll of TUSCL...who will succeed my reign?
- dude next to me..his voice is so annoying omg!!!!! He sounds like he is trying to interview to be the President of "total frat move"
For u dumbasses..frat guys sre not annoying and nor are their voices.just the stereotyoical frat guy voice is annoying as fuck, to the same extent that a valley girl accent can be.
- why the fuck are u sounding like youre slurring, super loud... Cursing and talking about weed on the bus. This is not ur home hes so annoying .
For u dumbasses..frat guys sre not annoying and nor are their voices.just the stereotyoical frat guy voice is annoying as fuck, to the same extent that a valley girl accent can be.
- why the fuck are u sounding like youre slurring, super loud... Cursing and talking about weed on the bus. This is not ur home hes so annoying .
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
50 comments
And LMAO well played, flagooner!
And Nicokeyes trying to denigrate a guy on a bus and comparing the way he speaks to being just as annoying in the way she types on TUSCL is not ironic at all.
Like, she's a barf bag, literally and figuratively. For sure, for sure!
And Nicokeyes trying to denigrate a guy on a bus and comparing the way he speaks to being just as annoying in the way she types on TUSCL is not ironic at all.
Like, she's a barf bag, literally and figuratively. For sure, for sure!
Anyway, one has to use caution and common sense in public places, and especially in the close quarters of public transit. Usually refusing to talk to people and looking for a chance to move away are the best options.
Once I came very close to violently interceding with this guy who was hassling to SJSU girls. The guy was your basic dry drunk burn out. I was going to start by making some very pointed and threatening insults.
But anyway, we all need to use proper caution. And this world does turn lots of people into casualites. Sounds like this guy you were next to was one of them.
DC, I speak to this on the Elliot Rodger thread, do you think colleges should cancel any and all formal recognition of frats and sororities? I do.
But as far as outlawing them, I don't see any way they can do that.
In some schools, like UCLA, they are real central. Probably at UC Santa Cruz they are a minor factor.
SJG
I guess in those places and times, people thought they were important. I think that the schools should sever ties with them.
Maybe some of the schools seem them as a source of alumni money. Sometimes school sports is used this way too.
SJG
But I don't know how anyone could do anything more than that, take any further steps to restrain them. And also, other kinds of social clubs might emerge, and they might not be so much the same. A co-ed social club could emerge, and that would be quite different.
I point out, sorority girls figured very large in Elliot Rodger's world. But I don't think he really ever interacted with them. They served more a very visible symbolic role. I have noticed this on college campuses too.
I believe that when intercollegiate sports is de-emphasized, when you have more "commuter colleges" it is de-emphasized, and when you have school with a counter culture focus or an arts and humanities focus, frats and sororities play a smaller role.
I had one professor who would make up jokes about "Sorority Girls", and tell them in class. He should not have been doing that. But it does show how they are able to make themselves into a prominent symbol.
SJG
You are really cool.
@ Skibum some men have values........
Frat boys are just bantam roosters.
SJG
Their ways are not that much different from those of the Police or from those of the Homeowners Associations.
The idea of ~~gangs~~ has locally been used as a cover for racism, police abuses, and for those who just want gentrification.
SJG
As far as Christian Nationalism, that is nothing other than domination and the trashing of church and state separation, and then saying that people have to plead for pity to be able to live in this world.
SJG
But the idea of gangs is still largely based on racism.
What defines the existence of a gang, and what makes this different from other social structures?
SJG
The idea of gangs is in large measure fiction, used to promote harsh and racially biased policing.
Racism is still very big in this country.
SJG
In minority urban neighborhoods, you're more likely to be harassed and or beaten by the cops than you are by gang members.
- Gang members don't like attracting attention and they don't want people calling the cops on them so they try to get along with people in their hoods.
- Most of the crimes they're involved in aren't violent ie selling drugs to white people, prostitution that serves white middle class men. Racketeering ie extorting businesses that extort the poor people in the neighborhood.
- Latino gangs try to model themselves after families. A lot of these kids didn't have parents who are always working, don't speak English, can't relate to them. The gang steps in and does shit like going to Disneyland, trips to the beach, bbqs. Lots of encouragement from OGs.
- Most gangs don't have a real hierarchy other than shot callers and then the Mexican Mafia members in prison.Its all very loosely organized. Money funds the gang's activities, gets clothes for members, helps out members' families. Gets reinvested into the drug trade.
So I take it somehow white gangs are different then?
Homicides and gang killings are classed differently.
Narco terrorism and street gangs are two different things.
The gang problem in Central America is directly tied to the gang problems in the US ie via deportees but again, the violence is exaggerated for political means and also by those seeking asylum in the US.
The real problem is a lack of economic opportunity, divestment from poor urban areas and rampant gentrification instead of actual community development. Groups like Homeboy Industries do more to curb gang membership and gang violence than a "tough on crime" stance for a very real reason.