If she wants to be taken seriously, she needs to debate in a bikini.
If I saw her on the street and didn't know who she was, I would fuck her for sure. Then run like hell before the cops got there.
All of the other people in the video are hilariously not hot. It’s like they made the whole thing as an excuse to get her to let them film her dancing with her arms above her head
I think she's slimmed down since the video, which is a plus. Did you know the only controversy about that video was in the left? Fox news and other conservative media simply didnt give a fuck, and no fucks were deserved.
She looks like shes got a nice rack, especially in the top she was wearing in the SOTU. I have a feeling she was wearing a shitload of padding, though.
In the final analysis, I dont even think I could hate fuck her. She's too damned mean and ignorant.
You know. I don't really care if she's stupid. I'd do her. Put the right make-up and clothes on her, she would make a heck of a stripper. As a competent congressman ? Not so much.
"After hearing her speak, I understand why she was only a bartender, in a booming economy after graduating with a major in economics."
This might explain why we'd be better off if she was still bartending....
[view link]
There is no understating the sheer stupidity of this woman. She would give slutBambina a run for her money. Strippershit pales in comparison: [view link]
Nyet. She looks like she's just a couple of genes away from being hot though. Like, I bet if you took a picture of her with the camera just slighhhhtly out of focus, she'd look pretty good
@GammaNuisance: "...no understating the sheer stupidity of this woman. She would give slutBambina a run for her money."
_______________
I'm sure glad our new ignore rules have fostered a kinder and gentler forum -- the kind of forum that would help us retain the participation of the dancers.
I hardly pay any attention to AOC and haven't really formed an opinion. She's not old enough to run for president in 2020, yet she's apparently the fodder of the Fox News crowd 24/7. This must be the third thread about AOC in past two months.
OTOH, we elected a senile realty-TV star who doesn't read, has no intellectual curiousity, and watches TV constantly, by all accounts. You could put him in a room full of dementia patients and you would hardly know the difference.
AOC isn't hot, but she is "work hot". And, since congress is filled with ugly, fat, old broads, she seems hot. However, stand her next to the interns in congress, instead of the reps and senators, and you would see what a bitter hag she actually is.
^ Yes, and most retarded Millenial losers tend to be libtards.
As for my opinion, I don't find her especially attractive, and she is about a 5 watt lightbulb.
But my standards aren't the highest. I'd like to tap her because she looks like she'd be an energetic fuck. I don't know why.
The richest company in the world wants to setup headquarters in NYC which will create 25,000 new jobs and bring-in $27-billion to the city; but the brilliant-economist Cortez is against it:
After a nearly year-long search, Amazon in November selected the Long Island City neighborhood of New York City and the National Landing neighborhood of Arlington, Virginia, as the two sites for its East Coast headquarters. The announcement was met almost immediately with protest by some New York officials and residents who feared Amazon would take over the Queens neighborhood, drive up prices and and push out existing residents.
Each of the new headquarters is intended to house 25,000 Amazon employees.
Asked for comment on the report, an Amazon spokesperson did not address if the company is reconsidering its plans to build an office in Long Island City.
"We're focused on engaging with our new neighbors — small business owners, educators, and community leaders," the Amazon spokesperson said in a statement. "Whether it's building a pipeline of local jobs through workforce training or funding computer science classes for thousands of New York City students, we are working hard to demonstrate what kind of neighbor we will be."
Later Friday, The New York Times pushed back slightly on the original Washington Post report. The Times reported Amazon executives were frustrated with the local protests and concerned about a possible veto of the deal at the state level, but had no intention to back out of the plans.
Democrat Ocasio-Cortez, who represents the Bronx and parts of Queens, opposed the project because of the potential displacement of families. She cheered the Post's report.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
✔
@AOC
Can everyday people come together and effectively organize against creeping overreach of one of the world’s biggest corporations?
Yes, they can.
…
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo addressed the deal during an unrelated press conference Friday, saying: "We have to make Amazon a reality."
"For the state Senate to oppose Amazon was governmental malpractice. And if they stop Amazon from coming to New York, they're going to have the people of New York state to explain it to," Cuomo said. "It is irresponsible to allow political opposition to overcome sound government policy. You're not there to play politics. You're there to do what's right for the people of New York, and what they did here was wrong."
The state's agreement with Amazon guaranteed $27 billion in revenue for New York with $3 billion returned to Amazon in tax credits, Cuomo said. He called the deal the largest economic development project signed in the state's history.
"There is no business that brings 25,000 jobs anymore. They don't exist. I spend days trying to bring a business that has 100 jobs or 200 jobs," he said. "Every project has local opposition. ... People just oppose change."
Cuomo and New York Mayor Bill de Blasio were early champions of the deal to move Amazon in, arguing it would bring jobs and economic investment to the city. Representatives for the city did not immediately return requests for comment on the report by the Post, which is owned by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos.
Many lawmakers and local residents have criticized New York's committed incentives, in particular, arguing city and state officials should be allocating money for subway repairs and public services instead.
State Sen. Michael Gianaris and City Councilman Jimmy Van Bramer, representatives for Long Island City, said at the time they had "serious reservations" about the deal. This week, Gianaris was selected to serve on the state board that will ultimately approve or reject Amazon's deal.
Gianaris told CNBC on Friday he had not heard any rumblings of a reconsideration before the Post report. He suggested that Amazon could be threatening to pull out as part of a negotiation tactic.
"This is typical of the way Amazon has handled this situation," he said. "If they're trying to extort New York through anonymous threats, they're showing that they're not a responsible corporate actor to begin with. ... If their view is we want your $3 billion or we're leaving, maybe they should leave."
It's unclear what a Plan B for the headquarters would look like, after the spectacle that the first contest became. State and local governments offered tax incentives and other gifts in an attempt to sway the choice.
Amazon has yet to build or lease any space in Long Island City and isn't expected to receive full approval from local governments until 2020, the Post reported, citing unnamed sources. That makes walking back a deal relatively easy.
Citigroup announced in November that it would move more than 1,000 employees out of its Queens office tower in the first half of 2019 to accommodate the first wave of Amazon employees. It's not clear whether a legal agreement was ever formalized.
In addition to the planned developments in New York and Virginia, Amazon is also preparing an investment in Nashville, Tennessee. It will become home to Amazon's East Coast operations hub and create 5,000 jobs.
In comparison to New York, Virginia and Tennessee have been largely welcoming of Amazon's plans.
[view link]
Maybe NYC is doing fine without a sudden influx of 25k residents. I’ve heard rumors that It’s already pretty crowded there. I’m no economy expert though.
Unfortunately not by me. Yes, that's a wicked set of chompers. She'll find a decent publicist one day and get taught how to smile pretty.
Is a guy not going to pound Julia Roberts because she's got too much gum showing?
I just pulled up the site without logging in. When you do that, you can see posts of people that you have on Ignore. I saw that Nicole 1994 has changed her profile photo to this woman. That is very fitting as I see them and kindred spirits. Neither has a brain.
I saw her on Colbert - and she looked very good. I’ve fuck complete pigs - and she would be a huge step up.
My only requirement would be for her to shut up for the entirety of the banging session.
I don’t agree with her politics - and by that I mean I’m on the polar opposite end of the political spectrum.
If she’d wear a tricky dicky Nixon mask, I’d find it kinda freaky and kinky - and a little hot too...
How does a politician at 29 years old who’s main professional experience as being a bartender all of a sudden become an expert on economics, environmental science, and constitutional law?
AOC seems to convey knowledge in all three of these things to which she only regurgitates what her party wants her to say. Dumb!
She has degrees in Business Administration and International Relations from Boston University. What credentials do you have?
She also has a background in working with non profits dealing with environmental, minority and constitutional issues. And you?
Needless to say, she of course has expert advisers for her proposals. And she isn't a party hack, the party establishment doesn't share her positions.
I can see it now the whole country living in public housing and playing video games all day while being serviced by the stripper grade hotties in the SJG organization
LOL
68 comments