Reviews & Extras ?
Papi_Chulo
Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
Now that we are approving reviews, and due to the current FOSTA climate, shall the rule-of-thumb be to reject reviews that mention extras including the word "extras" even when the dancers' names are not mentioned?
Shall we treat the Tijuana and German FKKs the same?
Thoughts?
Shall we treat the Tijuana and German FKKs the same?
Thoughts?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
46 comments
If someone is posting "got a HJ for $60", then by all means, reject it outright. Names or not...
According to Wikipedia, "In political jargon, a self-licking ice cream cone is a self-perpetuating system that has no purpose other than to sustain itself. The phrase appeared to have been first used in 1992, in On Self-Licking Ice Cream Cones, a paper by Pete Worden about NASA's bureaucracy." And because there's Google, "navel-gazing" is "self-indulgent or excessive contemplation of oneself or a single issue, at the expense of a wider view."
I’m inclined to approve reviews if they mention extras - but don’t mention the specific act or price.
Given the current climate, I don’t think it would be a good idea to mention specifics about what you got and what price you paid. Anyone who feels they do need such information should PM the reviewer asking them if they would like to share specifics.
Honestly, this feels like an issue where founder should weigh in.
Standard fun = just high milage
Low/
Mid /
High/
That's possibly not true. A website that specifically covered the Tijuana scene (I forget the name) just closed shop due to FOSTA. I would assume that happened after they talked to a lawyer and determined that they had enough exposure to a lawsuit to warrant shutting down.
From what I'm reading, if it's an American-hosted website, or has an American owner, and hosts any content that violates FOSTA, then it falls under the FOSTA shadow. It's a ridiculously broad law that will only be narrowed via court challenge.
I would reject reviews that:
1. Mention any sex acts (extras) performed for money
2. Name any dancers who perform sex acts
3. Recommend any clubs based on the availability of extras
Better safe than sorry.
Day = made :) :) :)
https://www.tuscl.net/discussion.php?id=…
Just my opinion.
The landscape has changed. That's not paranoia; that's a fact.
"Outsourcing your sense of right and wrong to founder isn't even close to a reasonable proposition."
We're not debating right or wrong. We're debating what potentially registers as a contact on the FOSTA radar. Seeking guidance from the person who owns, operates, manages this site is the respectful thing to do.
Brought to you by the crack team at LegalZoom? Or the guys smoking crack at the laundromat down the street from the club?
About a year ago there was a well publicized case in Seattle where LE went after the website operator *and* the reviewers of the site
Everything always comes down to right and wrong.
Next we will hear about a chacken wing law.
I noticed a few who think sending PMs will keep their privacy but the folks that might have a problem would have no trouble at all getting those PMs, so much for that plus founder has already stated he will cooperate with LE if any hint of a crime is committed. Why don’t you guys take your cue from him as I’m sure he will not be shy if he feels anything here is stepping over any lines.
Now let’s get back to having some fun and fuck the paranoia!
On an unrelated note, everything I have ever written here was a work of fiction. I have never even been to a strip-club. I hope to go to one soon, ... with my wife, ... Morgan Fairchild, ...whom I've seen naked.
In order to inoculate this site you would have to scrub every review, discussion, article etc. for the last 25 years removing all references to p4p opportunities.
Reviews stating got FS and spent less that a hundo aren’t promoting sex anymore than saying you went to the local bar and met a girl that fucked you silly, and you spent less than a hundred.
I say carry on, if this site is targeted for termination it will happen regardless of what anyone writes in the next six weeks.
IMO we have gotten used to "a way of life" on TUSCL but now the rules have either changed or at least more murky - I guess not everyone sees it the same way to which I express a heartfelt and sincere "fuck you jackie" :)
"Everything written on this site should be considered a work of fiction."
That takes care of everything.
If this site isn't safe from FOSTA there's nothing we can do now to save it. Obviously I'm hoping it is safe, but that remains to be seen.
But as others have said, if Founder has not posted new guidelines, then it is what it is.
In general, I think the best approach is to name names if there is a ROB but otherwise keep things on the DL. Because that info is relevant to all customers. A girl's name or what she may or may not do for this or that customer isn't all that important because some girls have good days and bad days or don't dig older/younger/white/black customers.