I'd like to hear your takes are on what mileage details are OK to post or not in reviews when referencing dancer's stage name. I appreciate reviews that state dancer's name, looks, cup size, natural /bolt on, and some level of mileage detail, especially when I'm going to hit a club first time. I put that info in my reviews, but furthest I've gone describing mileage details along with dancer name is FIV, but perhaps that crossed a line.
Please weigh in what level of higher end mileage or extras being described (HJ, BJ, DATY, FS, titty fucking, whatever) should reference the mileage only and not the name. And if not OK to actually use name in relation to higher mileage, is it OK to provide subtle identity hint (i.e., looks, or her name is B*****) to assist in a better club run.
I'm asking for 2 reasons. First is to put it out there and encourage detailed reviews while not getting some girl in club trouble or getting some girl or club in LE trouble. Second reason is topic came to mind when I saw recent posts of @desertscrub and others saying stop naming names of HiLiter extras girls. Thanks, and before posting this I did a site search for similar discussion topic but didn’t find any.


The search turned up nothing? There's actually been a few discussions on this topic, and I haven't even been here that long.
If you're going to use the dancers name, don't give any details of extras (HJ's, Titfucks, BJs, FS). I'd say the furthest you should go is mentioning that she was cool with grabbing boobs, ass, feeding, maybe FIV but that would be the furthest.
If you want to be detailed, just omit the dancers name. If you're trying to help out readers of your reviews to know which girls give the best mileage, let them figure that out on their own. You've let them know that certain mileage is possible at that club, it's up to them to figure out the rest. Plus the overlying rule: Your Mileage May Vary.