DANCER MILEAGE – WHAT DETAILS ARE OK TO POST IN REVIEWS?
I'd like to hear your takes are on what mileage details are OK to post or not in reviews when referencing dancer's stage name. I appreciate reviews that state dancer's name, looks, cup size, natural /bolt on, and some level of mileage detail, especially when I'm going to hit a club first time. I put that info in my reviews, but furthest I've gone describing mileage details along with dancer name is FIV, but perhaps that crossed a line.Please weigh in what level of higher end mileage or extras being described (HJ, BJ, DATY, FS, titty fucking, whatever) should reference the mileage only and not the name. And if not OK to actually use name in relation to higher mileage, is it OK to provide subtle identity hint (i.e., looks, or her name is B*****) to assist in a better club run.
I'm asking for 2 reasons. First is to put it out there and encourage detailed reviews while not getting some girl in club trouble or getting some girl or club in LE trouble. Second reason is topic came to mind when I saw recent posts of @desertscrub and others saying stop naming names of HiLiter extras girls. Thanks, and before posting this I did a site search for similar discussion topic but didn’t find any.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
13 comments
Latest
If you're going to use the dancers name, don't give any details of extras (HJ's, Titfucks, BJs, FS). I'd say the furthest you should go is mentioning that she was cool with grabbing boobs, ass, feeding, maybe FIV but that would be the furthest.
If you want to be detailed, just omit the dancers name. If you're trying to help out readers of your reviews to know which girls give the best mileage, let them figure that out on their own. You've let them know that certain mileage is possible at that club, it's up to them to figure out the rest. Plus the overlying rule: Your Mileage May Vary.
This one was pretty good on the topic:
https://www.tuscl.net/?page=post&id=5415…
This one was, too:
https://www.tuscl.net/?page=post&id=5421…
In brief, the way I see it is -
What you risk from posting that info:
The dancer gets fired
The dancer gets a flood of random guys expecting her to do X as though she were an escort
The dancer figures out it was you who posted the review and stops talking to you and alerts all the other dancers at the club, so even your lap dances are low contact from the on
Some variation on the Phoenix situation
What you gain from posting that kind of thing:
?
Sounded like it turned out to be a major bummer for the guy who had posted the review.
A dancer could get fired if mgt or other dancers read your review.
Other customers might read the review and expect the same service - and price. Then the dancer is confronted by an asshole customer demanding an act at a specific price - and saying he read about her on this site.
There are many negatives to your approach - and minimal positives - so don’t do it.
The other question is of course what to put in a review even if not using the dancer's name - it's kinda a toss-up b/w giving info about what can be had at a club, and perhaps giving too-much info - some on here believe putting in reviews what one gets at the club may draw unwanted attention to the club - others believe that was goes on in clubs is already an open secret for those that would potentially have an issue w/ it so it's not as if anyone is revealing some sort of top-secret that would o/w be unknown.