I Think Some of My Topics Are Getting Deleted
In the last couple few days I've started a couple of topics entitled "@vincemichaels is a Self-Admitted Pedophile". These topics seem to have vanished from the board.What is up with that?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
24 comments
Latest
SJG
It does make the board a lot easier to navigate, even when not signed in now. Dougster those millions of threads you start with the same topic? No one reads them, we just scroll right past. But it's annoying even having to scroll. Thankfully with the moderation, we don't have to anymore.
Not sure if it's Founder directly removing them or if he's appointed someone else to clean up the board. Bit whatever the case, it's certainly welcome IMO.
I guess the obvious question would be 'have you messaged Founder?' Or, are you hoping that he'll state something publicly here?
Pure speculation on my part, but I suspect that he's at a crossroads between being completely done with the off-topic trolling and drama, but also loathe to start moderating the forum (for any number of reasons).
Nobody? Incorrect based on the replies I see. Again you pretend like you are speaking for the entire board when you are not.
Out of curiosity when I first got on this forum and saw your spam threads about Rick Dugan and Vince Michaels I clicked on them just to see the replies. Lo and behold it was you commenting over and over. No one else. Much like those SJG unibomber threads that I also learned to avoid.
So which replies are you talking about?
TFP: "So which replies are you talking about?"
This is hilarious. In the first sentence, you are like "well, yeah, I guess there are replies". Then in the last sentence you are like "there aren't any replies". Have a little trouble keeping your story straight even across the space of one post, TFP? Just how much of a pea-brain are you?
LOL!
Interestingly enough, once Rick spoke out is when you stopped attacking him. Which was cool since, like most of those crappy threads you start, it wasn't changing anyone's perspective on Rick and just clogging up the board.
Point is, no one misses your Rick Dugan is gay threads and they did absolutely nothing. Much like your VM threads, which are thankfully being deleted also.
I don't think you were around the board long enough to know the impact my campaign against RickDugan had against perspectives against him. It definitely changed them.
You are just saying a bunch of stuff you wish were true, "spamming and prolonged campaigns never helped!" but is provable untrue given the evidence. It's definitely had a big impact against both Dugan and @vinceygirl, although it turns out that @vinceygirl is by far the bigger problem.
Sorry, but you just like to pretend you speak on behalf of the entire board when you uses phrases like "nobody and no one" when you are not speaking for everyone. You wish you were but it's just not true.
s pedophilia long before, as early as when @vinceygirl started complaining about the end of teenage swimsuit competitions. @rickdugan also made fun of vince's lying about military service.
So much of what you say is just plain factually incorrect. You have decided the conclusion you want to arrive at, and ignore all facts that show that it is wrong, and then you just pull thing you would like to be true, but are provable false (rickdugan's long time stance) out of thin air and present them as fact.
tl;dr: you are a real dummy
Much like you have accused me of coming to a conclusion, I can see you've done the same in regards to your spam threads. You think they are the ultimate weapon against pedophiles and system runners and nothing will change your mind.
https://www.tuscl.net/?page=post&id=5354…
Here is the exact context:
vm: "And who here doesn't like looking at beautiful young women ? You are a stupid asshole, Douchester. I don't doubt for a moment you have looked at a young women or a hundred of them and wanted part of them. It's what you do about it that counts and I've never molested any of them. Can everyone here say the same ??? I doubt that. Not trying to insult those of us with restraint"
tiifyfag:
And who here doesn't like looking at beautiful young women ?
^^^^^^ ROFLMAO @ dat BS!
13yeer oldz aint yung womenz u DUMBAZZ #PEDO!
txtittyfag
November 29, 2017
13yeer oldz b kidz!
U COMPRENDE U DUMBAZZ PEDO
vm: "You are an idiot. A woman is a woman no matter what age they are, what a stupid POS you are, fag. Lick my asscrack. LMAO"
And who do you think made fun of RickBoy's The System in the first place and won't let them forget? Again you know nothing of the history of this place. You have decided conclusions you wish were true, which fit in your little erroneous narrative of the world, but don't look at what the facts actually say.
tl;dr you are a real dummy
https://www.tuscl.net/?page=post&id=5402…
As far as the Vince Michaels comments, I only know the history that you guys have dug up. The sex with the 14 year old is indeed, damning. But the quote you posted, not so much. He said who hasn't looked at a beautiful young woman. When I hear young woman, I think of an 18-20 year old woman. He didn't say older teen, he didn't say young teen, he said young woman. So like I said, it's all about the context. He said, a woman is a woman matter the age. Here once again, I assumed he meant an 18 year old is a woman just like a 60 year old is a woman. He didn't say, an older teen is a woman, or a child is a woman, or a girl is a woman.
Anyway, all this means nothing. Like I said before, just like you feel I've already made up mind, I feel you have also and nothing will change it.
@TFP: "The sex with the 14 year old is indeed, damning. But the quote you posted, not so much. He said who hasn't looked at a beautiful young woman. When I hear young woman, I think of an 18-20 year old woman "
Dude, get a brain. Read what he wrote. He clarifies this himself, by saying it doesn't matter if he thought about it because he never molest "any" of them". (Contradicted by what DoctorPhil, not clubber, quoted later). Why is he talking about not "molesting" any of them if he is only refering to women 18-20?
Again, you just aren't a person who comes to conclusions based on facts. You have a neat little narrative of the world you want to believe. You people you like: dugan, and clubber. And those you don't like: e.g. me and DoctorPhil. So when you "recall" thing you play back a narrative and fill in people you think are the good guys a scenario you want to believe is true. Good guy clubber did this. Good guy dugan did this but not until after good guy clubber did this. All these facts you are getting wrong should give you a hint that there is something majorly wrong with your mode of thinking. But that's just the way it is with dumb people like you.
tl;dr you are a real dummy