dancers with tattoos
JohnTitor
don't sweat the petty things-pet the sweaty things
Have a preference?
I like them as long as they're not on the face lol
I'm smitten by a dancer that is sweet as peach pie and hotter than hell, and tatted big time.
However, there is something to be said for soft flesh that hasn't been touched by the machine yet.
What do you like?
I like them as long as they're not on the face lol
I'm smitten by a dancer that is sweet as peach pie and hotter than hell, and tatted big time.
However, there is something to be said for soft flesh that hasn't been touched by the machine yet.
What do you like?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
24 comments
Have an opinion, or just wanna be a dipshit troll?
Somehow I have highest hopes for this, our 12th time this year discussing this topic :)
- With rare exceptions, tattoos are at best neutral to me, and usually a negative. They just almost always have a negative connotation to me: trashiness, poor judgement, poor taste, immaturity. And yes, I realize the excruciating irony that those are EXACTLY the qualities that a 20-something year old girl needs to have sex with me for money :)
- If I only stuck with strippers with no tattoos, I'd have very few options. So tend to be able to ignore them.
- Tattoos that are so unattractive that I have trouble ignoring, from least objectionable to most objectionable, include: sleeves, ghetto looking tats, anything on the front or sides of the neck, anything on the face (not counting microblading and shit like that)
I grew-up in the 80s (my teen years) and back then tats were not as big the fashion statement they area today, as SuperDude mentioned, in previous decades tats were associated w/ the criminal element, low-class people, or service-men.
As others, I'm not into tats but have become somewhat immune to them and actually like some that make a dancer look a bit more of a bad-girl - so I like some small-ones that add a bit of bad-girl quality but do not like big-ones like full-sleeves or an entire-back - also dislike them in certain areas like the back of the calves, forearms, chest (right below the neck), those look gangsta/low-class vs sexy - don't mind a small sexy-one on one of her boobs, perhaps a small-one on her butt, the lower-back, maybe the thigh - as long as they are not too-big and not many of them.
Aren't they still?
Sometimes a few tattoos can make a really hot dancer even hotter if done tastefully. I don't mind small tattoos in any of the following areas
- above her ass (tramp stamp)
- above her hip
- upper arm, just below her shoulder
- upper back between her shoulders
Now, if their body is covered in tattoos, it will be very hard for me to see past that. I will most likely be completely turned off. The sad thing is, a lot of these girls were probably really hot before they got all those tattoos.
You're correct them being more "mainstream", but not always, at least at present. I know a number of the younger set that can't get certain jobs with visible tats. I think isn't so much the tat as it is quantity and/or subject. Just my guess.
Still if were to be asked for a new girl, no or yes to tatts. I'd always say no, despite some of faves I'll now always vote yes to keeping.
While I always prefer no tattoos, I, too, find that some types don't bother me at all, and there's a few that just scream "dirty slutty girl" and can get me going when I'm in the right mood (read: drunk).
- Tramp stamps
- Tattoos on her side, from her lower rib cage to top of her pelvis. For some reason, written verses (don't care what they say) drive me crazy here.
- Tattoos on the side of her hip
- Tattoos on her hamstrings. This one is risky, they sometimes look HORRIBLE, but sometimes they are insanely sexy to me.