Hillary Clinton: We made a person who committed sexual assault president
TheeOSU
FUCK IT!
Yes his name was Bill Clinton and you shilled for him so you could stay in power!
What a hypocrite this cunt is!
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/c…
What a hypocrite this cunt is!
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/c…
33 comments
You probably wouldn't understand the difference @ThreeOSU since you're too repulsive to have any type of unpaid relationship with the opposite sex. What a stupid post.
I also agree that Hillary has no credibility on these matters.
The slickster has a very long history of molesting and forcing himself on women going back long before he reached the White House but of course you conveniently overlook that because you're basically the same guy but @ peon level compared to your hero.
I don't have the time or come here to argue with a rainbow chaser whose MOA is to instantly insult people that say something he disagrees with because that's how it's spelled out in the leftist handbook but i will inform you that the three way i had with your mom and sister last night was unpaid and they both found me very charming. Now FUCK OFF little boy!
@ Doces, it's par for the course for him, that's all he's capable of so get used to seeing more of it.
As I said, what a stupid post @OSU. Even for you.
"The Paul a Jones case was dismissed out of court." I can't recall the outcome of that scandal, but there was a person charging that it was non-consensual.
"Trump admitting to groping women on tape." We're there any victims complaining? That's not rhetorical, I don't know.
I don't consider either as being good role models when it comes to character. As one poster stated earlier, it is ridiculous that ideology causes so much willful blindness.
------------
The outcome is that Paula Jones made out with $800K and there was no admission of guilt.
Please try to remember that the OP started a thread about Hillary being a "hypocritical cunt." If you'd like to start a thread about Bill v. Trump, I probably wouldn't have the same reaction.
I don't get your point.
And none of us have ever boasted of anything that wasn't true?
Fishsticks makes it rain $30K
VM is a Medal of Honor winner
I have a big dick
Neither did Trump. In fact, he never went to court.
Can't you see the hypocrisy in what you are spewing?
..and I have a big dick, too.
Groping and rape are not the same thing. And as far as I know, the only person who has accused Trump of actual rape and has even a shred of credibility whatsoever is his ex-wife, Ivana; the accusation is in a book, published years after the fact, and she eventually withdrew the accusation and even endorsed Trump for President. All of the other allegations against him seem to have surfaced during a presidential campaign and then mysteriously disappeared after the election, making them all seem highly suspect. Trump has probably groped hundreds of women in his life, but to my knowledge, none of them ever went to the authorities. And he did it all while being a rich and famous guy, but NOT while he was a government official. There's a difference. To me, this puts him in the Harvey Weinstein category: repulsive, but probably can't ever be convicted. And the accusers should have said something at the time if they want to be taken seriously. And you know what? Groping or kissing someone just isn't a real crime. I'm sorry, but it isn't. Example: Man gropes and forcibly kisses woman; woman says no, stop, pulls away; man says, "sorry, I thought you wanted it, my bad. I must have misread the signals" and then they go on their merry way. No harm no foul.
Bill Clinton is a different story. The Lewinsky thing was completely consensual, but many of the others were not. Some of them did try to go to the Arkansas authorities, but then sometimes the police were in on it, too. Do you remember Troopergate? The evidence against Clinton is pretty strong. At a bare minimum, he abused his power. But he's probably a rapist, too. It's a shame that the republicans chose to focus only on the fact that he lied about consensual sex with Lewinsky.
But all of us TUSCLers, even lopaw, would have to stop and think about all the girls we have groped in clubs. Are any of us clean enough to throw shade on someone just for his boasts?
And be nice to randomloser, you're going to make the sensitive little snowflake cry. Lol
---------------
Of course I can't respond to @GammaNut because he has me on ignore. As one of our premier internet pussies, @GammaNut likes to hurl insults and racial epithets, while hiding behind the ignore button. If you happen to read this @GammaNut, I have a very thick skin and never feel any need for "ignore." @ThreeOSU may not understand the difference between assault and a consensual affair (after all, he's never had one) but at least he's not a pussy.
Weinstein did contribute to Hillary's campaign and Hillary was swift to condemn Weinstein. She did not go as far as to return the money, but there was a statement that the campaign money was already spent and that the Clintons give 10% of their earning to charity. I think I'm satisfied with that answer.
This might have more relevance in the Harvey Weinstein thread. After all, I assume none of us here on TUSCL ever groped a woman while we held a high government office with influence over law enforcement. We were just private citizen perverts, much like Harvey (but unlike Bill Clinton). But other than that, I agree with what you said.
This has nothing to do with Monica Lewinsky. Educate yourself. Bill Clinton was a sexual predator who his behind his office. Just because he once had a consensual relationship, that doesn't mean all his relationships were consensual.
-----------------
No, he had many, documented, consensual relationships. Paula Jones and Broddrick are the only two alleged cases of assault that I've ever heard of, and both were dismissed.
@25: "He’s the biggest snowflake on TUSCL. What a fucking crybaby !"
-----------------------
Yep. A forty-yr-old infant.