Someone once posted a graphic diagram depicting the relationship between porn content producers, free tube sites, advertiser, and financial backers.
The 'gist was that content producers produce porn that people pay for either early access, specific fetishes, or whatever. Then the producers either leak content intentionally after he exclusivity period or third parties pirate it. It ends up on the free tube sites.
The advertisers and the tube sites themselves data mine the users' search terms and what the users watch, how they watch, and how long. They feed this telemetry back to the content producers who determine what to produce to get more clicks (from the 99% of uses) or how to convert the 0.01% to subscriptions. So they're profiling you.
If there is more incest or family taboo porn it is because people are searching for it. Simple as that.
Dominic77 is probably right, but I think there's more to it than that. I could be wrong, but I think what you're actually seeing is just a return to normal in the porn industry. From around 2001 to 2006, the industry was very afraid of Federal obscenity prosecution due to the perceived puritanism of the then-newly elected George W. Bush administration. Porn industry super-lawyer Paul Cambria came up with a list of things that pornographers shouldn't do if they wanted to avoid prosecution by the Bush Justice Department. One of the things he said to avoid was movies featuring incest as a theme. Honestly, some of his suggestions were just silly, such as avoiding interracial porn using black male performers, and the industry never took that suggestion seriously, but they definitely seemed to take the incest suggestion seriously.
As public support for Bush weakened by 2006, pornographers began to explore some of the previously off-limits themes again, including incest. Of course, the Cambria List was an overreaction by the industry to begin with, and some minor industry players continued to flout his suggestions all throughout the Bush years. It's true, the religious wing of the Party seemed ascendant with the election of GWB, but the only major porn prosecution that I know of that began under Bush's watch was John Stagliano, which was an especially stupid and wasteful prosecution that continued under Obama before ultimately failing. And I don't think Stagliano's prosecution had anything to do with "violating" the Cambria List.
Anyway, the incest stuff seems harmless, even if it were real, as long as it's consensual. I think there are some countries that do allow real or semi-real incest, because I've seen scenes that were filmed outside the USA with the Stevens Sisters (Britney and Whitney Stevens) in which they are kissing and licking each other. It's hot stuff.
I've noticed the same thing. I use XNXX most of the time. I just took a quick look at their home page. They list about 100 topics to search for teen, MILF, Japanese, etc but incest is not one of them. But once you start surfing the site, you find it all over the place. However I am seeing a lot more Step daughter, father, etc.
I think they have just run out of sex related scenarios.
I think Dominic77 and BurlingtonHF give some very good insights.
I was wondering if they mine the data on sites like pornhub - and it makes sense that they would.
My thoughts were far simpler than the points made above. I was thinking that since MILF porn became highly popular - they took the genre farther - and put the MILF with an actor portraying a son or daughter. Once they saw the genre was popular - they exploited it - and now there are many step sons getting naughty with a hot mom.
Once the genre got popular - they simply exploited it - as they do with all entertainment.
@Cashman1234: most like Pornhub does data mine. Pornhub is owned by conglomerate MindGeek, who owns a number of tube sites. Look up MindGeek sometime and see for yourself.
Dominic77 I agree. I basically expect every site to mine all the data they are able to collect.
It's like they used to say "There's no such thing as a free lunch" - it could now say "There's no such thing as free porn" - as they are using your clicks to determine each of your preferences - and provide even more targeted porn to you.
As someone who has had step-cousin sex (my step-dad's niece) and had a friend in HS who bragged about step-sister sex (she was promiscuous with everyone else, so it was easy to believe she would do him too), the step-sibling fantasy has always been strong.
The step-father/step-daughter stuff is creepier, since it is often someone in a position of authority exploiting someone they have authority over. I don't like that regardless of the relationship of the two people involved.
What do you think about the "Daughter Swap" series, where supposedly two dads, both with hot daughters, swap them for some fun?
Joc13 - I basically lump it all into the incest porn genre. The porn girls are what get me to watch. So I'm sure swaps are hot if they involve my favorite girls/stars.
I had a girlfriend in 8th grade whose mom would also kiss me in ways that would get her arrested today if anyone found out about it. GF didn't seem to mind, so I wasn't going to tell.
Because it's not really incest porn in the truest sense of the term. All of these videos start with a sort of heavy-handed disclaimer along the lines of:
MALE: "But Mom!"
FEMALE: "You mean 'step mom'. Now put your dick in my ass."
Etc. Etc.
They scenario never crosses the line of blood relation sex.
Some of you guys are really turned off by this. I don't understand why. We're talking about a fictional father doing his fictional daughter. Or a fictional sister making out with her fictional sister. We're not talking about *your* daughter or *your* sister. And even if they really are related (like the Stevens Sisters I mentioned above), who cares as long as they are hot?
There was an old porn film named Taboo. This was back in the 70's. It was about a mothers sexual relationship with her high school aged son. That was back when porn had a plot and storyline.
In my opinion - the incest portrayed there - had a more taboo feeling. But there was a story - moreso than a girl saying "Fuck me daddy!" So I don't find this new type of incest porn to be that convincing.
@Cashman1234, totally agree. I don't even know why they bother sometimes nowadays, when it's so obviously fake. I've never seen it but I know Taboo was a real classic.
@Dominic77, and what if you do act on it in real life? It's not my thing, but as long as it's consenting adults, does this really still bother people? I mean, even here, in this pit of degenerates and whores? ;)
@BHF: you're talking to the guy who reads Tuscl with his wife and she knows I go to clubs. So I'm already straight with her. I'm not one right now to seek relations outside of marriage, so incest isn't in play.
But I think incest is right below guys who have to pay for sex. The presumption is you can't get it elsewhere (for free). So some (not me ) would think incest or paying strippers for sex is pathetic and desperate. Otherwise, you'd get a legit civvie.
Personally, I'm on the whole consenting adults things. Incest would never work for me. For others, it might. No judgement.
In closing, I did enjoy reading GoldmongerATL's sex with his friend's daughter sage. I also enjoy reading incest and taboo fiction on literotica.com .
I see what you are saying about the tube sites. I count 1-2 father/step-daughter and 1 mother/step-son on pretty much front page all of them. Some of the step-daughters are cute spinners with perky boobs. Incest doesn't convey on the screen like it does with the written word. I agree with @Cashman1234, I'm more interested in the stars in the scene, too.
I actually find an erotic plot/story to be a big contributor to the turn on effect of porn. Mediocre actresses in a hot story can still be a big turn on.
The incest theme in porn is so overplayed now. The market for it is oversaturated. I couldn't care less about it. Like several others have already posted, I'm into watching certain porn stars, and so if one does an "incest" scene I'm watching it for her and I couldn't care less about the theme of it.
I went and got my LDK on with a potential LDQ dancer at a divey club a few months ago. As she grinded on my cock from time to time she would whisper in my ear, "Oooh Daddy, do you like that?" It didn't help or hurt the dance, but it was like she wanted to keep role playing that way even though I wasn't giving any response to it. It struck me that the 'schtick' as a daughter has worked for her in the past.
SirLDAlot - I'm sure it gets some PL's going. When considering the daddy issues that many strippers have - I'm wondering if it was more for her (than for you).
I've mentioned a girl from SA I've seen a couple of times. She is 30. She likes to use the "daddy" stuff. I don't care for it, but it doesn't turn me off enough to stop her.from doing it when it seems to turn her on so much.
42 comments
Latest
The 'gist was that content producers produce porn that people pay for either early access, specific fetishes, or whatever. Then the producers either leak content intentionally after he exclusivity period or third parties pirate it. It ends up on the free tube sites.
The advertisers and the tube sites themselves data mine the users' search terms and what the users watch, how they watch, and how long. They feed this telemetry back to the content producers who determine what to produce to get more clicks (from the 99% of uses) or how to convert the 0.01% to subscriptions. So they're profiling you.
If there is more incest or family taboo porn it is because people are searching for it. Simple as that.
As public support for Bush weakened by 2006, pornographers began to explore some of the previously off-limits themes again, including incest. Of course, the Cambria List was an overreaction by the industry to begin with, and some minor industry players continued to flout his suggestions all throughout the Bush years. It's true, the religious wing of the Party seemed ascendant with the election of GWB, but the only major porn prosecution that I know of that began under Bush's watch was John Stagliano, which was an especially stupid and wasteful prosecution that continued under Obama before ultimately failing. And I don't think Stagliano's prosecution had anything to do with "violating" the Cambria List.
Anyway, the incest stuff seems harmless, even if it were real, as long as it's consensual. I think there are some countries that do allow real or semi-real incest, because I've seen scenes that were filmed outside the USA with the Stevens Sisters (Britney and Whitney Stevens) in which they are kissing and licking each other. It's hot stuff.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Cambr…
I think they have just run out of sex related scenarios.
I was wondering if they mine the data on sites like pornhub - and it makes sense that they would.
My thoughts were far simpler than the points made above. I was thinking that since MILF porn became highly popular - they took the genre farther - and put the MILF with an actor portraying a son or daughter. Once they saw the genre was popular - they exploited it - and now there are many step sons getting naughty with a hot mom.
Once the genre got popular - they simply exploited it - as they do with all entertainment.
It's like they used to say "There's no such thing as a free lunch" - it could now say "There's no such thing as free porn" - as they are using your clicks to determine each of your preferences - and provide even more targeted porn to you.
The step-father/step-daughter stuff is creepier, since it is often someone in a position of authority exploiting someone they have authority over. I don't like that regardless of the relationship of the two people involved.
What do you think about the "Daughter Swap" series, where supposedly two dads, both with hot daughters, swap them for some fun?
But fucking your best friends mom is perfectly OK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0DeIqJm…
MALE: "But Mom!"
FEMALE: "You mean 'step mom'. Now put your dick in my ass."
Etc. Etc.
They scenario never crosses the line of blood relation sex.
In my opinion - the incest portrayed there - had a more taboo feeling. But there was a story - moreso than a girl saying "Fuck me daddy!" So I don't find this new type of incest porn to be that convincing.
But I think incest is right below guys who have to pay for sex. The presumption is you can't get it elsewhere (for free). So some (not me ) would think incest or paying strippers for sex is pathetic and desperate. Otherwise, you'd get a legit civvie.
Personally, I'm on the whole consenting adults things. Incest would never work for me. For others, it might. No judgement.
In closing, I did enjoy reading GoldmongerATL's sex with his friend's daughter sage. I also enjoy reading incest and taboo fiction on literotica.com .
In terms of incest porn - I'm more interested in the stars in the scene - not the genre.
I remember the Barely Legal genre - from several years back - when they would "bend" the rules to include barely legal 30 year olds!
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/10/12/m…
Although it means the same, for whatever reason the former is more arousing to hear from a hottie.