Rejected Reviews?

How long was your review ?

The biggest issue is the review length

Are you sure it's not width that matters? I bet e.e. cummings' reviews would get rejected all the time too.

I mean, who has time to read shit like:

Went to the Dirty Catfish Had my hand deep in my pocket in the front room The bouncer told me to tone it down Bessie Jo came over Two knuckles to paradise Cletus had run out of Listermint Car detailed the next day to clean up the steering wheel Next time, Kansas

LMFAO

I'm positive it's length

I'm a specialist in this

Believe me, no one has ever complained about my length!

I'm talking about comment size. Penis size is another issue but that didn't come up in the review.

None of my 113 reviews have been rejected, though my first attempt at an article was. My reviews have grown longer and more detailed over time, but they will never attain the magnitude of a Papi_Chulo opus.

Ivr been rejected for reviews more time than I can count....the biggest lesson I learned was the length of the review

Dick size LMFAO

I don't think the length of the review is the issue. If it is anything, it might be the content. Then again, many reviews get published that we know are obviously fake.

It's not content...trust me

If it's content it's the issue of a full copy and paste job then it could pass then get deleted or rejected

Usually isn't the issue

Trust me when I say this it's the length

Out of all people trust me I know

Only the articles seem to be truly judged on content

Trust me I've been rejected a million times on that one as well LMFAO

Be as long as you want but if content is off that review isn't happening

Article I mean

In the review content can be Shit but if length is their it always passes

I wrote a very short review one time that got rejected. I thought if someone wants to know all the little details I've already described about the club, they can read older reviews. I now make sure I add in extra details when I write a review.

If you are talking length as in the review is too short, that would make sense. Reviews certainly are not rejected for being too long.

I hear Founder only rejects reviews if the reviewer is a douche-bag. :)

If the review is too short the computer will send you "That's not much of a review. Please add some more details." Other than that no one is reading them before they are published.

Shadow that's obvious LMFAO

I've never understood why articles read then accepted and reviews are not

Must be a volume thing

The other besides length is if it looks to much like it was copied from another review.

Why was this review accepted?

Review Of Fannie's In Atlanta By 2002gti Fannie's170 REVIEWS4401 Fulton Industrial Blvd SWAtlanta, GeorgiaFULL NUDEAUG 26, 20175.866.196.87 2002gti19 MINUTES AGO 567 Friday Evening 6-10 dancers CLUB Want an unforgettable experience? If you are open-minded and non-judgmental, so get here early because the tickets are not seat specific, unless reserved. There is a bar that serves beer/wine and liquor and several cocktail tables spread throughout the place.

Besides being open minded, please allow plenty of time to watch the show. The show can and possibly will run over the allotted time, so make sure you don't have something urgent to attend afterwards. For starters, our MC was hilarious. His shtick was a 70 year old lounge comedian (the guy was probably in his 20's). The acts that followed were strange, unique, and diverse to say the least. I could go into detail about every act we saw and all the jokes we laughed at but that defeats the purpose of going. The only thing I will add is that you must be 21 or older to attend and don't be shocked if you see any nudity ;).

LMFAO I agree with shadow LMFAO

That review is Shit

"I hear Founder only rejects reviews if the reviewer is a douche-bag. :)"

But it isn't foolproof. Fishsticks was able to sneak a few through.

I'd say that a review might be rejected if it looks as phony as a 3 dollar bill..................