Skinny or thick, who has more sex?

Well curved skinny girls make the most

Even if the bubbles top and bottom are small as long as its in proportion I believe they get the most action hands down

All I know is my own experiences which means no fat girls. :)

I went clubbing last night and there was a dancer (Caucasian, interestingly enough) who had an honest-to-God Ashley Graham vibe about her. Hour Glass figure, fairly toned stomach, very thick thighs and hips, and natural set of pretty nice DDs. Unfortunately, she also had a plethora of tats and piercings that made her a lot less attractive.

@ATACdawg, a white girl with tattoos who's built like Ashley Graham? Sounds like exactly my type. Did you do anything with her?

Personally, I really prefer thick girls but that wasn't what the OP was asking. My guess is that skinny girls have much more sex on average. People discover at an early age that they are either attractive or unattractive by societal standards and then they decide whether it's worth investing time and effort into "improving" themselves further. They learn quickly that the standard of beauty includes being thin. "So why not lose weight? I'm already 90% of the way there to being hot," they reason. An unattractive girl, even if she's thin to begin with, may just say "Fuck it, I'll never be hot no matter what I do. So I'll just sit and eat some raw cookie dough." And hence the tendency toward attractive girls being thin and unattractive girls being thick. And we all know that attractive people have much more sex on average (excluding paying customers of course). So there you go. Thankfully there are some exceptions to the rule, otherwise I probably wouldn't bother clubbing at all.

That's a good question. I remember friends chastising me in school when I asked how it was possible that fat chicks ever got laid. Apparently I just didn't get it: no matter how fat/unattractive the woman there is always some guy horny enough to be willing to have sex with her if she wants. So I guess it's not their looks that matter as much as how willing they are to put out.

On the one hand, maybe the skinny are working on it so hard for a reason. But, on the other, maybe the thicker girls need the affirmation more often.

This post was inspired by one of my co-worker's (the hot MILF) complaining that she couldn't sleep at night, and that her excessive running has caused her to lose 18 lbs recently (she has been looking good). I thought to myself, "is her husband not giving her orgasms at night?" And so I went on pondering if intramarital sex is more frequent for skinny MILFS.

It's only been less than a hundred years that skinny, less than "pleasingly plump", has been considered attractive. Look at pictures from the 1800's or portraits from earlier. I find it disappointing at times that we are so susceptible to society's pressures.

I confess. I'm susceptible. I like my dancers thin. Tuscl

First of all 5'6'' and 100 lbs is anorexic to me.

There is a fairly new dancer at Follies that fits that description and seems to be very popular. See DroidX's last Follies review.

^^^LOL

Yeah 5' 6" 100lbs is about 15 lbs underweight. Even for me, and I like slender girls.

A lot of rather thick women are getting fucked in high quantity.

SJG

@larryfishguts “First of all 5'6'' and 100 lbs is anorexic to me.”

larry you won’t be 5’6” tall for a few more years if ever

Zero correlation. Stupidity is a far better indicator #idiotocracy

@Burlington: No, I didn't. The nipple studs and u-shaped nose stud put me off a bit! The tats I could have tolerated.

Chief reason? My new ATF was in the building!

^^^ good movie.

Men want sex Women want commitment

Broke, loser man = fat, old woman Rich, popular man = hot, young woman

Given that a majority of women over 30 are carrying some extra pounds, I'd guess chunky chicks have more sex. Agree with Array's comment about society pressure re what's considered attractive.

For me skinny chicks are more attractive because they tend to have a more positive "attitude".