From SW: crystalize-->"Do you go up to the guy who looks the wealthiest, or the guy who has given you signals that he is interested in you, first?"
We Had a Rabbit Like You-->"I don't put much stock into guys who "look" wealthy..they are often cheap assholes who want the attention but have no money , like the guys who brag about how much they make..when you have money you can show, you don't need to brag. Guys in suits make me uneasy, haven't had good experiences. "
Leica-->"If I had a lap dance for every broke asshole who wears a suit to try look wealthy...I'd own a club not work in one."
Danni-->"Wealthiest "looking" doesn't mean jack. First off, just because he's nicely dressed, doesn't mean he has money or is willing to spend whatever he does. Go to the guy that you pretty much know is a guarantee."
EastCoastDancer01-->"if I do go up to a custie on the floor, it would be the guy who looks at me and gives the vibe of being interested in a dance. The way he dresses or how "rich" he looks does not matter to me one bit."
It was "fuck the guy in the suit" in a landslide! Don't blame me, I'm just the messenger. I apologize from deep within my loins, for challenging this sacred PL Axiom. Of course, it makes me wonder: what if the guy in the suit IS the one who is showing you attention? What then? Hmmmmm?
:) :) :)
stripperweb.com


Exposed: Shocking flaw in Subraman
He believes what he reads on SW is true.