The other night I stopped by a former favorite club of mine (actually more of a go go bar) that I had dent been to in a while. What caught my attention was 3 of the dancers that were there at first glance looked like they had put on a couple of pounds (haven't we all). After talking to the bartender a bit (have know this guy for years and I can be completely candid with), I got out of him that they were pregnant (plus anouther one I knew not on that evening), and he thought that at least two of them by the same guy. Now, that itself didn't surprise me told me who he was (typical unemployed stripper baby daddy pot smoking type), but my question is, if pregnant, in your opinion, is that a turn off or on and should they still be dancing? I know mine, but curious on every one else's.
Well, what do you consider it? A turn on or off? You asked the question, but only answer it with " I know mine, but curious on every one else's."
For me it is a turn off, but if the club let's her continue to dance, then there must be a market for it in their view. It is between the girl and her employer.
I'm going to guess that for a majority of men in general, a pregnancy triggers protective instincts, not carnal. I know some guys get turned on by the pregnancy, or by lactation, but species-wide, pregnancy far more often switches off sexuality and switches on protective instincts. IMO.
I have only seen it about twice, and it was a turnoff. I'm sure there have been dancer who have been a month or two pregnant that I did not even notice. It seems like falling off the pole or tripping in stilettos could cause a miscarriage. I have heard there is a niche market for lactating and pregnant women.
I see it every so often and it is a huge turnoff. Especially in my local clubs, where smoking is still allowed. Hanging in a smokey club, doing things on stage that could be dangerous if she slips, and having guys pawing at her nether parts in the back are not things that she should be doing if she is trying to protect her unborn child. I actually feel a bit of disgust when I see it, truth be told.
The early stages of pregnancy are not unattractive. The breasts grow bigger and the woman glows. I'm happy to see a stripper in the early stage of pregnancy as long as she doesn't claim it's mine.
Id say for most its a turn off, but I have heard of a few people that where into it. Also I'd say its ok for the first bit of the pregnancy for the dance to work but not the whole time as it could be dangerous (she could fall or slip and land on her stomach or something similar and that just wouldn't be a pretty sight)
I've only seen this one time at a club in my years of going.
Total turn off to me. Couldn't even look at her on stage.
But, I remember when I went to this club, some guys were into it and she actually was stil able to sell dances to a few guys. All it takes is for some pervert to be into it. And as we know, every guy has his "thing." That's why you can see so many different body types, hair and ethnicity of girls at some clubs.
jackslash--->"The early stages of pregnancy are not unattractive. "
Oh yes, agree. But to be clear, I'm saying that for me (and evidently some of the other guys, too), it's not a physical thing -- or not strictly a physical thing -- we're talking about. Just hearing she's pregnant, regardless of whether she's showing, is a turn-off to me. If she's showing, even more so.
It's neither a turn off not a turn on, in and of itself. A girl is attractive or not, irrespective of pregnancy. As for dancing while pregnant, I don't think it's any more inappropriate than pursuing any other occupation while pregnant.
It could be argued that prostituting while pregnant is dangerous, but no more so than while *not* pregnant, and sex itself isn't dangerous while pregnant, though it might become to uncomfortable for her in the later stages.
I have never seen *obviously* pregnant stripper but if I did, I would feel sorry for her and future baby. What kind of a man knocked her up if she still has to strip during pregnancy?!
19 comments
Latest
For me it is a turn off, but if the club let's her continue to dance, then there must be a market for it in their view. It is between the girl and her employer.
I'm going to guess that for a majority of men in general, a pregnancy triggers protective instincts, not carnal. I know some guys get turned on by the pregnancy, or by lactation, but species-wide, pregnancy far more often switches off sexuality and switches on protective instincts. IMO.
I've only seen this one time at a club in my years of going.
Total turn off to me. Couldn't even look at her on stage.
But, I remember when I went to this club, some guys were into it and she actually was stil able to sell dances to a few guys. All it takes is for some pervert to be into it. And as we know, every guy has his "thing." That's why you can see so many different body types, hair and ethnicity of girls at some clubs.
Oh yes, agree. But to be clear, I'm saying that for me (and evidently some of the other guys, too), it's not a physical thing -- or not strictly a physical thing -- we're talking about. Just hearing she's pregnant, regardless of whether she's showing, is a turn-off to me. If she's showing, even more so.
It could be argued that prostituting while pregnant is dangerous, but no more so than while *not* pregnant, and sex itself isn't dangerous while pregnant, though it might become to uncomfortable for her in the later stages.
I have never seen *obviously* pregnant stripper but if I did, I would feel sorry for her and future baby. What kind of a man knocked her up if she still has to strip during pregnancy?!