Besides checking favorite clubs on TUSCL every day, I also spend some time on that other site. No, not StripperWeb -- I mean StripClubList.com. Yeah, I know -- it's chaotic, crude, anonymous, and utterly unreliable, but every once in a while I get a tip from it on where to go or who to get dances from. I've been struck in recent weeks by how many posters on SCL, at least for clubs in the Midwest, mention a new trend: strippers who won't do lap dances but will do OTC. In fact, the purpose of their strip club "work" seems to be to arrange OTC. For examples, check out the SCL pages for Dancers, Brad's Brass Flamingo, and Babes in Indianapolis. Some of these posters are quite pissed off by the decreasing availability of lap dances and want club managers to force strippers to do lappers! I honestly don't understand that coercive way of thinking -- if a girl doesn't want to dance for you, why would you want someone to force her? Wasn't slavery abolished in this country 150 years ago?
Have any of you noticed a similar trend? I guess I'm really asking two questions:
(1) Are more dancers using their strip club jobs as a way to arrange OTC?
(2) Are extras becoming more available ITC?

I say yes to both, although I've only been seeking extras and otc for a relatively short time period so I might not have the best perspective.
In clubs that allow it, I commonly see strippers who are trying to build their escorting business. But I've never seen one who turned down money for lap dances. Seems like the club could require stripping and lap dances since it's the essence of the job.
Many clubs will fire the girl for having an explicit escorting business on the side. In those clubs otc discussions take more time and effort.