Condom BJ vs uncoverd HJ
shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
One of my buddies recently got a condom BJ. I have never had one and don't think that I would ever pay for one. I have however taken a couple of girls to VIP that would not do more than HJs. I knew that going in and was cool with it. But if given the choice for the same price, I think that I would take the uncovered HJ over the covered BJ. To me it just down right feels better.
You?
You?
22 comments
two tips on getting a good covered bj:
1) put on condom and leave no slack-zero space between tip of the dick and the condom
2) the girl should be a hooker. ALL of my best covered bj's were from hookers. strippers and regular girls don't possess the cocksucking abilities as those of hookers.
I wanted uncovered bj's but all hookers insisted on the hat being placed on. but when the first hooker I ever got put on the rubber w/no slack and started blowing-after cumming-one of the top 3 orgasms in my life.
The " sort of" exception is a bbbj that converts to a hj just at the point of no return. Even then, it just doesn't hold the magic for me..... I generally won't repeat with a dancer if I learn that to be the case.
Agree 100%. nothing worse than a HJ that makes your cock feel numb. I will generally try the CBJ over the HJ, if the HJ isn't working I doubt many strippers would mind stopping the CBJ to go to the HJ.
Y'know, he's got a point. A HJ that feels like she's trying to beat it down instead of beat it off is not what one looks forward to. Honey, don't act offended that it went soft when you just put it in fear of something tearing up.