Liberal Hypocrisies Within Science, Big Bang Theory Disproves Global Warming
joker44
In the wind
Saturday, January 4, 2014 11:27 PM
Yesterday, Brother shark posted this discussion: 'Ship stuck in the ice was studying global warming, haha' along with a link to that ever-reliable fount of wisdom and reality, [view link].
I humbly add to this foundation by posting this story from [view link] (Conservative Valuses for an Unsaved World)
"Any Good Christian knows that God created the world. God created the world
perfectly, with Moral Americans giving him emotional support; with Canadians,
Europeans, Australians, Asians and Blacks to laugh at; with hipstersexuals and
emosexuals to present him with a fun challenge, basically they're the villains in
his video game; and a labyrinth known as the countries and continents
completing it for his own personal enjoyment. However, the incessant liberals
dispute this, arguing that we can't prove the existence of God and that it simply
happened as a result of the Big Bang. Ignoring the fact that the theory is a
double entendre that seems to want us to believe that a bunch of particles are
engaging in an orgy, that's illogical, to steal a quote from my fictional nemesis
Spock. Something cannot come from nothing.
Liberals are hypocrites, it's a reality that stands out to all but them. It's
allegedly racist to say Barack Hussein Obama looks like a monkey, but it's okay
to say Sarah Jessica Parker looks like a horse. Gay marriage yes, but no to
polygamy and bestiality which are basically at the same moral level. Tax the
rich. Obviously there are going to be potholes in their pseudoscience as well.
More evidence of the homogay evil controlling science
As a responsible conservative reporter, I feel the duty to research what the
nemeses say. I read their books, the ones that claim that God does not exist and
that they know all because they're pretentious narcissists. In one, it mentioned
that as the universe is constantly expanding, it cools as well. This would
hypothetically make sense, considering how the matter is spread out further,
leading to less collision and thus, less thermal energy emitted. But Christopher,
you may ask, there are so many stars, and nebulae forming all the time. My
response? Well first, you're probably a liberal if you're saying that. Second, if
the Big Bang is to be believed, the universe is constantly expanding at a rate
faster than a human can comprehend. If the dirty Europeans at CERN are to be
trusted, the universe could be expanding at a speed faster than the speed of
light. It takes a star a few thousand years to form. The expansion of the universe
would thus definitely outweigh the speed of star formation, and would barely
compensate.
So, if the universe is cooling from the constant expansion, doesn't that
contradict the idea of global warming? Sure, you may say, there's the
atmosphere, that provides a barrier from the unGodly aspects of space. Rockets
can break that barrier at a certain speed. For the expansion of space at the rate
the liberal commie scientists want us to believe, that speed is much faster than
that of a rocket. This would mean that earth would be hypothetically receiving a
lot of the effects of space considering the speed and power of the matter outside
of our little safety bubble. Allegedly, the static on televisions is part of the Big
Bang. Wouldn't, then, that mean that the earth would in fact be cooling? If the
matter is exuding less thermal energy by the second, science would have you
believe yes.
And yet, we feel no heat. We don't feel cold either. Antarctica exists. Religion
triumphs over science. Science is a group of contradictory lies. Astronomy
contradicts the concept of the environment, and we realize that intelligent
design is the only logical reasoning for everything, and explains everything in
an organized and well-thought out manner. Scientists can go die in a hole for
their conceit because they're so wrong and I have no idea why anyone would
believe anything they say except out of non-conformity. I dream of a world in
which people would not argue that they believe in science. Science cannot
support itself, and once again conservatism wins.
How does this post make you feel?
Amused 1100%
Excited 00%
Fascinated 00%
Shocked 00%
Sad 00%
Angry 00%
About The Author
Republican, American, Christian, Man, Carnivore, White, Hero, Genius,
Brave. All words that adequately describe Christopher Christenson. At the ripe young
age of 28, Christopher has been writing for Christwire for quite a while, when he isn't
warding off the North Koreans from attacking or mentoring youth at his church.
Because of his young age, he is able to connect with the young people whilst still
charming our beloved elderly. Christopher is fascinated by the grotesque trends
among youth and will stop at nothing to investigate."
Amen
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
17 comments