Camming - how times have changed

A a SC the other day. They dancer on stage insistently signaled to another dancer to come to the stage. Dancer on stage hands a camera phone to dancer two who promptly begins closeup video of the stage routine. I saw some of it afterwards. Surprisingly good quality and intensely "up close and personal." Yes, the times they are a' changing!

MFC? What site is that?

@Lone Wolf, I cannot verify this but a smoking hot, nearly perfect 10 dancer I met recently told me Playboy does not pay very well. She claimed $22,000 for posing and an eighteen month contract. While that might be considered a tidy sum, spread out over eighteen months it really isn't much.

She claimed it wasn't enough to convince her to pose. Then I paid her $20 each for lap dances in VIP. Go figure.

@Corvus: I'm referring to 20 or 30 years ago when posing for a mag like Playboy was a big deal. I think (not positive) they were paid a lot more than that back then (adjusted for inflation).

Shit, even so, a lot of the babes on these camming sites are finer than most the honey's that posed back then.

Most of the women on the cam sites are from Europe. Mainly Romania. They are sexy as hell and also open up more sexually than many US women. They are fine as hell and like said before willing to do anal, dp, role play, etc. Depending on the website they make 10-50% of what is charged per min. It isn't good money at all. But in some european contries that is good. They can make $50-100 a day. Now some might think that sucks. But many have two jobs or are trying to pay for college. YEAH i know some might think the last part is like SS but some it is true because they work on the sites at early hours in the morning....then they go to school for a couple hours and hit repeat.

There are also some hotties from the USA as well....damn cam sites got me too.

lotsoffun201 - I think MFC is a reference to the cam site featured on TUSCL. My Free Cams.com

Personally I find cam sites boring.

@crsm27: yea, the foreign babes are fine. I've found it interesting that the cam models in the US act like there is no fucking way they would ever actually meet their viewers (without body guards and body condoms).

In contrast, the foreign babes are probably open to meeting anyone under the right circum$tances. Could be a mis-perception on my part though.

From what little experience I have looking through cam sites, the people running those things must be making a fucking fortune.

Shadow, I concur. Cam sights are the 21st century phone sex. Save the money that you might spend on a cam sight and spend it on a flesh n blood female.

I would like more free cam sites with higher resolution and able to go full screen. I occassionally look at them if I want to. Never signed up and do not visit the sites on a routine basis. I guess someone is paying money to keep the sites running. I suppose the business model collects income from a few paying customers drawing in a larger base of large male viewers who never pay. On one site, I'm not sure but maybe you get higher resolution full screen viewing. I know for free it times out after a minute or two. On my free cams, resolution is lower but you get a free show. Window size is limited even though it can be stretched. The quality of the resolution ism't super great. I have wondered if the paying customers get better resolution.

If everyone had google fiber Internet speed, Which I heard is about a thousand times faster than my slow broadband, I could imagine high def cams on full screen tv's broadcast into your living room. Right now I only watch whatever comes on tv and don't multitask the Internet while watching, except when I use my iPad. It would be nice to have super fast speed and be able to interact with hot girls while lying back on my sofa. Might need voice to text to interact.

Beyond that , I think it might be fun to create interactive erotic realistic holographic girls you could talk to and watch in 3d in your living room. We'd be getting closer to holodeck tech at that point. If you could project an entire holographic room around you, it could be like visiting a strip club except you only get to watch. However you would get to dictate to the girls whatever you want them to do. Might be fun. If that was photorealistic, it could be very nice. It would probably take tons of processing power and display technology to project real looking humans in 3d. Maybe a shortcut could be made projecting real girls in 3d. Just imagining.

Wikipedia says Danni Ashe is the only woman in the world who has appeared on the cover of both the Wall Street Journal and Juggs magazine. She sold her web site in 2004. Her most recent activity was filing a lawsuit against the Daily Mail.

While I can see the appeal of the cam sites I don't see the appeal of spending money on the cam site. On the other hand I am also lately becoming convinced that from a value for pleasure proposition a good Asian Massage Parlor has pretty much everything -- club or escort -- north of Tijuana beat. But you don't get the club vibe.

I’m a voyeur and love to look at beautiful women.

I of course prefer them in the flesh – but for my personal taste in women – I often find more of the type I like in the cam sites than I do in SCs.

I like streamate.com which can sometimes have close to 1000 models at any one peak time. I like black curvaceous women – I tend to see a lot of them on streamatte.com with big or really big natural black tits – where I don’t see much of it @ the SCs. A lot of the black cam models I like on streamate.com are from Colombia or South Africa.

Due to the economics and lack of opportunities in many foreign countries, it means that many women can often only get ahead via the sex industry and thus one can often see cream of the crop (in terms of looks) when it comes to foreign sex workers.

I too was kinda of addicted to streamate.com when I first started and in some months could spend up to 500 smacks on them. But I then realized I had to make a choice b/w spending on the cams or SCs – and of course SCs were the obvious choice.

I'm NOT at all interested in Internet Cams. I wish to see & feel a REAL woman & to smell her fragrance & interact 1 on 1 with her. NOT possible with Cams! IS possible in a club.

I don't get cam sites either, and prefer the feel of a live woman in my lap. It is particularly annoying when amazing dancers leave the pole completely for camming. Chili Palmer and I both remember an incredible Phoenix dancer with a PERFECT body, who danced very successfully at both Bourbon and HiLiter, and quit dancing completely to do camera work. Makes sense I guess, no house fees, no tip out, no club drama, and possibly more money, but it really sucks for those of us that prefer a hands-on experience!

I don't get camming either. I prefer warm flesh, and if I'm going solo I just need to pay for the Astroglide and my cable bill.

My ATF tried it out but quit right away, which was a good thing for me since I'd have dropped a lot of money watching her late at night! But for me watching a stranger...no thanks.

I used to go to imlive.com a good bit, and actually spent money there. Most of the girls I met were Russian or Romanian, and absolutely beautiful. I got private email addresses from some and kept in touch for a while outside of the site. It was fun, but soon it wasn't enough. I think that's part if the reason my strip club frequency increased lately. It was fun for a while, but I want to touch!

I don't get the cam sites at all. I like my sex interactive.

I don't get off when girls are fingering themselves, squeezing their boobs. And I know there is sections where there is male female camming sex stuff, but that's just "live" porn and I just never could get my rocks off to porn anyway. All in all, I need interaction, that's what wakes up little shark in the morning.

Agree w/ SC and others: Not interested in vicarious thrills; prefer the real, live, warm woman in my lap. Want to touch the real thing. Internet is a poor second when cash is low or local clubs' dancers are not very appealing.

But there are many younger men [& women] who prefer to interact over the internet rather than in the flesh.