Who is safer:
A P4P stripper who does OTC with guys after dealing with them in the club a few times. (Do not count risk of beatdown or shanking from Duo, Kitty or StripperWeb strippers in dressing room.)
An escort who always uses a screening service line Preferred411, Date-Check.
I'd guess both are pretty safe. Someone with bad instincts about who is or isn't safe should probably go with option 2.
A dancer that I've cultivated a stable patron/dancer relationship with.
Otc is safer in my opinion. Online escorts who need "screening" and photos and shit make you a liability for a police raid. How do YOU know 100% this online escort is not a cop. Otc you can ask a million questions and won't get hung up on because...well she is right in your face. You can determine more solid that its not a sting op. In regards to the law evasion anyway. For good ol jump and take yo shit...well play your cards right and you can dtermine that too...to a fault
A guy who goes with option 2 should also do his fair share of screening: check her reviews. If she doesn't have any reviews, Red Flag. If she only has a couple reviews and those reviewers only have one or two reviews under their belts, Red Flag. If she has a good number of reviews, some even by known and trusted sources, Green Flag.
Another thing to check out would be any photos she uses online; if there are any, Tineye.com is probably your best friend. If there are only a couple of hits and those links take you to similar sites where she's also advertising, it could be a point in her favor ("could be" being the operative words here). If there are numerous links, especially to sites with extensions like .ru, .hk, and so on, it's a flag to avoid her.
The thing to trust most though is your gut. If it tells you, "Don't," then don't.
I prefer strippers OTC. Except Duo. She might shank me.
I'd see both but prefer strippers when I am in the U.S.
I've said it before but I'll reiterate why I prefer dancers. Even with a gal who does extras, you are going to have to put in effort for OTC. I like the challenge or game of it. I don't mind when civie gals play hard to get. I like the challenge. I ain't a thirsty dude who doesn't get laid.
Slick - There is something to be said about the "excitement of the chase" from a SC buffet.
ilbbaicnl - 99.999% say they don't keep records on their clients. 99.999% lie. Trust me from experience that one's information is not any safer with 411 or Date Check as I have endured the heartaches to prove it. The Big Doggie site used to have a chat room that escorts & clients could interact. I would build up a relationship over time with an escort and she would see me without screening, then I would later use her as a reference with the next lady. The plan usually worked and I didn't have to give any information at all to future pursuits of even VIP ladies. The bad news is that I don't know of any available chat rooms to continue the above practice. Text messaging, twitter, facebook, and other social media doomed my plan.
Another point that I have posted before is that "incall" with an escort is very risky because of hidden cameras. Got burned on that one as well. Only "out call" or OTC for this old boy. I think the escort route is cheaper in the long run but I do get excited over the chase. The "OTC Chase" requires building rapport which most often equates to spending money with her prior to agreeing to meet OTC.
One thing is for sure - chasing pu$$y is expen$ive no matter what venue one chooses.
Ididthisonce - But chasing pu$$y via OTC or Escorts pales dollar-wise by comparison to dating. You get more bang for your buck, so to speak, with the former. And don't get me started on marriage/divorce...
@Rod8432 - see, this is what I've been saying to all my friends. Everyone pays for pussy, it just depends on how you view it. And at least with an escort or an OTC stripper, you are pretty much paying for a sure thing as opposed to dating which is hit or miss with respect to getting any. I'd much rather fuck a stripper OTC for cash than date a civvie who may or may not put out. My friends are all like "I would never pay for pussy." But we all do in some fashion. I'd rather go for a sure thing.
@Sam-We don't pay for pussy, we pay for them to leave.
Rod8432 - The cost of marriage was considered as a given. Lost my shirt in that one also.
I prefer strippers OTC and motel encounters with SD site gals. As far as escorts doing a screening - not on my agenda as the previous two have given me all the pussy I can handle.
I offer strippers $150 itc, $200 otc. SD site gals I offer them between $100-$150 for motel sessions. I have found the married ones are more reasonable in dealing than the single ones. I usual have 3-4 of these two types of providers (Strippers, SD site gals) on roster at one time.
@Slick - point taken LOL.
I don't do Escorts. And I prefer to do OTC with a dancer who I have some ITC experience with. BUT I am not big on OTC. I prefer ITC interaction most of the time.
I would say with a dancer one has had a chance to meet her in person and “somewhat†get a feel (figuratively and literally) for her and her personality.
With an escort; it can be more of a crapshoot since you have never interacted w/ her b4.
Actually I was asking which is safer for the provider of the P4P. It's much much more common for the custy to be the dangerous one than to be the endangered one.
Only kidding Duo, I know you just bust a cap in their hoochie asses.
Answer remains the same
OTC is always a risk. You have to have photo ID to get a hotel room nowadays and then there is the risk of a honey trap by the girl or cops.
I never thought about OTC being safer for customers because they would kinda know what they were getting into. I always wondered why ya'll bothered with strippers in the first place, when there are so many escorts running loose. But this makes sense!
Mystery solved.
Like I would "shank" anyone!