Typical Extras Dancers?

If the payer is ugly and has no skills with people like the far sex.....then yes

Everyone has different taste in women. Player11's is different than yours or mine. There are guys out there that like "thick" girls and bigger. I have been in clubs with a lot worse and seen them busy in VIP. There was an Asian woman in Henry 8 South that had large old bolt on boobs, a very skinny body, looked at least 55, and had a pinched face with an aggressive attitude. She would come up to you when you walk in, rub your crotch, tell you she wanted to fuck and ask for a dance. I thought she was frightening but she was always in the back with a client.

There are more than a few similar girls in clubs locally. They are not typical of the ones towards whom I gravitate.

Definitely on the lower side of the stripper spectrum in looks. My standards are much higher for dances and/or extras.

Some of duo's more recent opinions are less popular than when she first started posting. Let's see how it ends up. Got my own prediction but I'm that one to myself!

Everybody has different tastes when it comes to the faire sex. I checked out Player11's pics. I won't disrespect his taste. From what I can discern, those girls look a little trashy but trashy sells and is popular.

Slick you called them trashy lol...thats not respect

I have a different type of woman, but as far as extras go, I'd rather do a $130 room with extras than $130 without, regardless of the dancer. In this economy extras are the dance, not an additional charge on top of the dance.

Eh, it's not like the girls on his roster are ugly... they're just not pretty.

BTW, of course I'm going to have unpopular opinions. I'm a stripper.

I like to have ass sex

Nah, you were playing safe at first and winning favor. And a stripper who knows what a Venn diagram is over the top. Then once you sucked 'em in - tell 'me what you really think.

I love it!

I'm not sure what the question is...

Do I find those girls hot, not really. But line up 10 guys and 10 girls - I doubt you'll get 10 different answers for who's the hottest but I wouldn't be shocked if you got 6-7. I know I could go to every club in Miami w/ Papi and he and I would probably never compete for the affections of the same dancer. That's not to say those girls are ugly or that his taste is bad, but we like different things.

If the question is would I rather spend on less contact with hotter girls or more interactivity at the expense of attractiveness, the answer is: it depends. Generally I go for girls I find hotter even if it means less. However, I'll occasionally go with a less attractive dancer know I'll get more.

Its sorta a sliding scale within limits though. $200-$300 for a good time with an 8 is a suitable substitute for moderate mileage with a 9.
It doesn't matter how hot a girl is, I'm not getting private no contact dances. I'll toss a few bucks on stage, but that's it. There's also plenty of girls who'd have to pay me more than a few hundred to do anything more than throw them a couple bucks cause I'm already sitting at the stage.

Agree about the no-contact dances, I can just watch porn. One-way contact doesn't do much for me either.

Even on a good night at the club, only about 10% are really attractive to me. But I only get "minor" extras like nipple and mouth kissing. I've only had one very beautiful dancer discuss doing something with my wang at a hotel, but she was talking north of $500.

Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems that a dancer that most custies would find really hot can do OK without doing P4P, or is going to charge much, much more than the going escort rate for P4P.

Depends on the city you're in. In Detroit they all offer and so the hotties are available for decent rates. I imagine things get harder and more expensive in Dallas, San Fran, or Seattle as examples.

Why would a beautiful woman stay in Detroit? Course I've asked essentially the same question about Richmond.