Possible GRE logic section question
ilbbaicnl
Keep it in my pants when I do OTC. If I were a stripper it would stand for I like big bucks and I can not lie.
I was telling a dancer (that I get dances from OTC) about an escort I had had multiple "dates" with. Escort came across as very GFE and generally self-respecting. She allowed me to eat her pussy. No bad surprise, impeccable hygiene. She seemed to have a orgasm, but I, naturally, was dubious. But the dancer says "no she probably really had one." Me: "But I'm old, fat and ugly, how is she gonna cum?" Dancer: "She closed her eyes and thought about someone else, or she may be the type that just responds to the sensation with no context." (Or something like that not an exact quote probably.)
Now, this is a dancer who is not even willing/comfortable to dance all nude with me, let alone let me eat her pussy. So, why would she say this? She is far from dumb, I can't think it would not occur to her that this escort (her competition for my $$$) is more attractive to me if she can have a real orgasm with me.
Tangent: Gay male friends have told me that there are gay guys who are very turned on by the idea of blowing straight guys. Suppose there was a team of a gay guy and a hot female dancer who did not want any contact with your schlong. The guy blows you while you have the typical two-way but no extras contact with the chick. Any appeal? I would not be comfortable with it, but maybe that's just homophobia on my part. Seems like you could focus your thoughts on the beautiful women you were seeing and caressing, and ignore the source of the accompanying penial stimulation.
Now, this is a dancer who is not even willing/comfortable to dance all nude with me, let alone let me eat her pussy. So, why would she say this? She is far from dumb, I can't think it would not occur to her that this escort (her competition for my $$$) is more attractive to me if she can have a real orgasm with me.
Tangent: Gay male friends have told me that there are gay guys who are very turned on by the idea of blowing straight guys. Suppose there was a team of a gay guy and a hot female dancer who did not want any contact with your schlong. The guy blows you while you have the typical two-way but no extras contact with the chick. Any appeal? I would not be comfortable with it, but maybe that's just homophobia on my part. Seems like you could focus your thoughts on the beautiful women you were seeing and caressing, and ignore the source of the accompanying penial stimulation.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
23 comments
I'm 67 and she's 27. She is one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen and I'm slightly overweight and as she very kindly tells me, maybe if I had danced more when I was younger, I might have better rhythm . We've fucked at least once a week for four years and there are feelings between us, but clearly, I'm not the young hot guy, she's used to. She never lies about orgasms and says, don't worry about it. I'm paying her to please me. I've explained that when she gets off, I feel pleased and like I've done a good job, too.
There's another dancer I've seen OTC several times and she always fakes orgasms and I know it, but I still enjoy it. This dancer also gives the full GFE which my ATF doesn't.
So, the bottom line for me is that honesty wins out. When she does get off I'm ecstatic, when she doesn't, she still works extra hard to get me where I want to be. I'll skip the weird threesome you posited.
IMO, I would say that the escort is probably a sex addict who can get off on anything/anyone. Which is exactly what the dancer is implying when she said 'she may be the type that just responds to the sensation with no context.' Furthermore, 'she closed her eyes and thought about someone else' should also be a default answer. Many if not all dancers 'get into character' to go on stage etc. Many perfect sens that an escort would 'get into character' and/or fantasize about someone else to hell sell the performance. Whether real or fake is more attractive to you is irrelevant.
Tangent: F*** no! There is a one penis rule around here.
(shit my spelling is almost and band as that bullshit tangent question)
1 guy & 1 girl in the room = ok
1 guy & 2+ girls in the room = ok
2 or more guys & any # of girls in the room = no good, one penis rule violated
The tangent is related in that both are about the possibility of enjoying (oral) stimulation that you do like from a source that you don't like.
See Ilbb.
See Ilbb eat pussy.
See three-way.