PL Scale...
I have this idea to try and quantify the PL qualities of individuals who frequent SCs and in order to do that I need to quantify some dimensions of PL-ship like for instance the number of times (on average) a clubber (no disrespect to Mr Clubber) visits a SC per month (1-2 = 1, 3-4 = 2, 5-6 = 3, 7-8 = 4 & 9+ = 5) that way if we have 6 or 7 or better yet 10 or more quantifible dimensions we can then run the numbers and see where we stand on the PLS or find our PLQ whichever sounds better.
So here's the task, come up with some dimensions and the associated scales and I'll publish the results and you can run your own numbers to see where you are on the PLS.
So here's the task, come up with some dimensions and the associated scales and I'll publish the results and you can run your own numbers to see where you are on the PLS.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
21 comments
NO it does NOT IMO. IMO it is based on one's opinion of their own behavior.
However, how many times you cum in your pants CAN be counted.
I'm all in favor of quantifying the strip club experience. But we need to decide if we're using "PL" as a pejorative term or simply as a humorous term for SC customer.
I measure my strip club visits with a "fun per dollar" metric, which combines the subjective experience with the objective amount of money spent. I rate a visit on a fun scale of 0 to 100 and divide that by the dollars I expended. A visit that rates 90 and costs $300 results in .300, while another that rates 90 and costs $400 results in a .225 score. This is a measure of how efficiently I'm using my money.
Maybe a good PL scale would be the amount of time you spend on TUSCL or the amount of time you spend on quantifying your strip club experiences.
I have told dancers thst I am one. They say I'm not. They say the guys that come in and spend zero dollars are the losers. But you can't divide by zero.
I have told dancers thst I am one. They say I'm not. They say the guys that come in and spend zero dollars are the losers. But you can't divide by zero.
@ Clubber - in the absolute I believe you are correct but this exercise is an attempt to collect various dimensions that make up our individual "idea" of what defines a PL. Like motorhead said above, dancers consider low financial investment a dimension so that can be quantified to a degree sufficent to incorporate it into a rateing. The result like assigning a "hotness" scale to women is inherently personal i.e. your 10 and my 10 will invarribly differ, but it is still a usefull tool on the outset.
So I am still curious about what criiteria can be used to quantify a PL and now I'll shut up.
What if a person spends $250 for nothing but a lap dance with a good ol' JIT but really enjoys it 'cos the chick he got it from is a major hottie. Now compare that dude to a jaded old fart who gets the BBBJCIMNQNSQWERTYUIOP OTC for the same price but it is with some trailer park girl that looks like a Klingon and the whole experience was so disturbing that he has to put a bag over HIS head so he doesn't see ANYTHING!!
In my book, Pervoid #1 was the winner and Pervoid #2 the loser. But #2 got objectively more for his money. He just feel like he has to wash for days to feel clean again after the experience...
So you say let's factor in looks... Perhaps we even weight the girls appearance in a non-linear manner. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder my friend. Indeed, imagine the scenario above but flip the girls. But let's say Miss Qo'noS (the Klingon home world my brothers) really appeals to Pervoid #1 whereas the beauty really can't get much interest from Pervoid #2 'cos he is SO JADED. Perv-a-roo #2 is still the loser in my book!
- to what extent do you buy into thinking that strippers sincerely like/respect you compared to the next John. Bonus PL points if you believe them when they say it's because you are "nicer" than all the other customers. Another bonus if you think believe this even despite the fact that you are paying them money for sex
- next dimensions is the extent to which you kid yourself into believing you sincerely respect women who offer sex for money. Extra bonus points if you have considered how much you would hate it if it was your own daughter doing it, but other women cause you no cognitive dissonance
- oh, just thought of a couple more
- extent to which you think strippers sincerely enjoy your love making skills
- extent to which you think pay hookers for sex shows that you triumphed in the "capitalist" system (actually your a different kind of loser if you consider the US a capitalist country but we won't get into politics here)
1 = shadowcat
25 = GeorgMicrodong
Rate yourselves accordingly.
Going to a strip club does not automatically make you a pathetic loser.
What makes you a pathetic loser is when you to to a club and pay a girl lots of money to act like she likes you. That is the key component to being a pathetic loser. It's clearly pathetic because you're under this delusion that a young pretty girl, who otherwise wouldn't be caught dead with someone like you, is actually in love with you. And you are clearly a loser, because you are totally incapable of getting a real girl to like you.
So if you want to figure out how you rate on the pathetic loser scale, you need to have the following information:
1. How much to you pay strippers/ATF's each month to act like they like you and suppress their gag reflex when they're with you?
2. How many dates with real women have you had in the last 5 years?
So if you spend, say, $1500 each month for your ATF's rent, and haven't dated a real woman in 8 years, you might be the King of pathetic losers.
So having sex is honorable and worthy of respect. Nothing pathetic about it, correct?
So how does a man get sex? Well, either by dating a real woman, or by paying for it.
Now we'd all probably agree that paying less for more is also an honorable goal, correct? So if we all want and need sex, then the opposite of pathetic is getting sex for the least amount of money, correct?
So I strongly disagree with those who equate going to a strip club and busting a nut for the least amount of money with being a pathetic loser. If it costs you, say, $100 to go on a date with someone and have sex with her, versus going to a club and spending, say, $60 and having sex with a hotter girl who you don't have to deal with when you're done, which is more desirable and honorable? And compare that to deciding to marry someone and have to spend the rest of your life and all of your money on her, just so you can get some occasional sex. Now THAT could qualify as pathetic !!!
So I feel that those who drop into a club, spend a few bucks to bust a nut and have fun with no strings attached, are worthy of respect, not being called pathetic.