Organized Labor's Newest Heroes: Strippers
jackslash
Detroit strip clubs
http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive…
We've had a number of discussions about whether strippers should be independent contractors or employees, and I think our conclusion was that the independent contractor model provides strippers with better money and customers with better service. The problem is with strip club owners who treat strippers like employees but classify them as independent contractors.
"[The judge] also ruled that the chain is required to grant all dancers in their clubs employee status within six months, ending the illegal practice of classifying dancers as independent contractors while also placing workplace demands on them that far exceed that legal status. By managing dancers like employees but putting them on the books as independent contractors, club owners get out of paying dancers the benefits they're legally entitled to, which could include worker's compensation, unemployment, and health insurance if they qualify. Owners and management alike tell dancers they're independent, but they still exercise control over dancers on the job, routinely using the kinds of restrictive rules on breaks and conduct you've come to expect of Wal-Mart, not the mythically "anything goes" world of sex work."
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
4 comments
Latest
A year from now the strippers who won the lawsuit will be trying to work at clubs where strippers are classified as independent contractors because the money will be better and so will the rules.
Now the lawyers have gotten their hooks in it. A few dancers will end up walking away with some money and in the end everyone will suffer.