I have an afinity for spinners.
shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
When I go go a club I look for them. 5' tall, 85lbs with small tits. If no true spinners are around, I then look for very petite dancers. Now this doesn't mean that I sacrafice size for mileage. I also have favorites at the other end on the spectrum. 5'11" 150lbs. But given a choice I pick the litte ones.
Does this mean that I am living a child molester fantasy?
Does this mean that I am living a child molester fantasy?
35 comments
If you are, please keep it inside your own head, if you don't mind. :)
I do believe it *is*, however, a manifestation of the evolutionary preference for youthfulness in our mates. I "suffer" from much the same preference, though I prefer a wee bit more meat on her bones than you apparently do. :)
As I read that, my first thought was sheesh, we're going to have to start calling you "Pedo-cat" from now on.
So, yeah, there may be something to it.
SC, while your (and my) attraction to the tiny beauties MAY be a bit of Lolita chasing, I am guessing we are NOT "wanna be" child molesters!
If it's, small, petite, flat chested. It's not for me. I too like more substantial girls. I want a girl with a butt who could play power forward in the NBA.
Borrowing from Wikipedia:
→ The phrase "I know it when I see it" is a colloquial expression by which a speaker attempts to categorize an observable fact or event, although the category is subjective or lacks clearly defined parameters. The phrase was famously used by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart.
I don't put precise measurement numbers to my preference for Spinners, except that the woman ideally be 8+. I also prefer tits that are of decent size. [See Profile for the rest]
"I want a girl with a butt who could play power forward in the NBA"
Not interested in NBA Asses! Just nice feminine ones! LOL
"No, there are some small women that are definitely mature"
Just because a woman is very petite & small DOESN'T mean she is NOT mature.
I knew a Spinner once in her mid 30's who was HOT as HEll & more of a Real Woman than any 20's something that I've ever seen or been with!
None that I've seen you molest looked anything like a child!
I tend to like petite women b/c they often seem to look more stacked; .e.g. a 34B on a 5 ft. slim woman may look busty whereas a 34B on a 5â€10 150/160 pounder will look smallish.
Any size titties will do as long as their are natural, but B/C/D is beter than flat.
Get Lost again.
This from the girl who, from the looks of the chair pic, likes golden showers.
What's your choice between a spinner with very small tits and one with larger tits?
I'm a tit man. I don't care if she's 4'11 or 6'11, but she *got* to have at least a B cup.
I hope when you say "8+" that you're referring to the hotness scale of 1-10
LOL.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/
But, the spinners can grind with all their might, and it'll be juuuuust fiiiiine. And, since they can hold themselves up more easily, they can just slide over your, uh, "lap", and not give you abrasions or callouses.
Indeed. That is my reference.
I DON'T find any sort of joking about about child molestation to be acceptable under any circumstances at all on this forum. PERIOD. There's NOTHING Funny about it under circumstances at any time by any forum member, New or Long time member - Young or Older!
Yup. exactly.
My preference falls between shadows, and motorheads. I'm "EO" with sizes- have happily bought multiple repetitive dances with dancers between ~ 5'2" and 6'3". Plenty of "sweet prospects between ~ 100 and 150 lbs. (OK, maybe one good one was 155-160 lbs). I've had a lanky 5'9" who weighed less than a buxom 5'3". A lot to go around...............
SC, I'm getting worried about your tiny size preferences. Does that mean trading in your Mustang for a Miata or Smart Car is next on your list??
I like spinners too. I don't think I have a "child molestation fantasy" and if it turned out that some of the women from porn on the internet whom I think of as super-hot were also under-age, although I could understand it just from a visual point of view, I think I would still be kind of freaked out and angry at the people who manipulated them into doing porn. I like the "young" look -- lithe, small bodies; firm breasts with no "underhang" (fails the pencil-test, can't hold up anything in the droopy part underneath); narrow waists that show a little bit of abdominal muscle development (though not too much); girlish hips; younger faces, with sprightly, impish expressions.
All this is a physical preference. I'm pretty sure it's hard-wired. I don't like big tits, whether they're real and floppy, real and rather firm and amazingly defying gravity, or fake big bolt-ons. I don't like big butts that waggle -- the usual thing to do in a walk-by, at one of my bars, is to turn around and waggle the ass at the guy; I think of this as crass and unappealing, and if the girl has a lot of waggle, I just think she's flabby rather than firm, and firm is appealing while flabby is unappealing, to me. I really don't like being with girls that have "plush" skin. I want "firm" body-fat (adipose) tissue distribution, tits ass arms legs. I am ashamed to say, Marilyn Monroe would probably not have elicited a boner from me, even in her finest years; her ass is too bloated, or so it appears to me from the pictures. I suspect Twiggy would have been freakishly skinny in real life, but then again ...
This is not a child-molestation fantasy. I don't want to be with someone who is under-age. That's for a large number of reasons. I don't want to be with someone who doesn't quite "get" whether or not we're "supposed" to be doing this thing called sexual activity. Also, I don't want to have to train my inexperienced partner, or convince her to want to put the damn thing in there. Rather, I want her to be experienced, "normal," able to fend for herself, an adult about sexuality, sometimes pro-active sometimes amazingly delighted at her reactions. I don't think of any of those attitudes or skills as childlike -- they're all associated with someone of adult skills and experience and knowledge and age.
Nevertheless, physically, I want her to look like a fairly young marathon runner, fashion model, or ballet dancer, give or take a bit of adipose for femininity.
"Spinner" goes further, I think. I believe actual spinners are people who are really tiny in a lot of aspects. Above, I've described someone small but within the average range; someone who is normal height, for example. To me, the term "spinner" suggests no more than 5 feet tall, roughly; and no more than 100 pounds. She's "freakishly small" and not that small person who is "petite" small but actually chunky. She's a shrunken human in all dimensions, including waist-line, arms, legs, etc. There are a lot of women out there who are 5'1" or 4'8" but they're not skinny -- they have large breasts, and hips to match. That to me is even less attractive than someone who is tall with large breasts. It just looks "dumpy" to me. It reminds me of that fat hairy guy sitting on a keg in the "Body by Budweiser" mock-advertisement -- not sexy at all.
But that's just my preferences. I'm sure someone else likes the short-but-curvy type. More for him! More of the others for me! :)
I have always been amused by members responses to your comments. Sometimes the intent of the writer is not always the same intent perceived by the reader.
However, after reading your profile, regardless of your intent, you are one wierd fuck.
Hopefully, others get the opportunity to read your profile before you alter it.