What do you pay attention to?
A review has three ratings, Atmosphere, Dancers, and Value? They are averaged to make the overall rating.But do you really rate them all equally when deciding on going to a club?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
20 comments
Dancers are obviously #1 and then meet that without exorbant bills and you got value.
if the dancers suck – I don’t care if the place looks like the Waldorf Astoria.
Period.
I though some of you guys liked dancers that suck! LOL
The value ratings do not influence me. I read the reviews and balance those on the experienced of the reviewer as best I can. And dancer quality is most important.
Value>Dancers
Again, stars get me to read review, review gets me to try a club. However i do find that i mostly visit with 4 or better value stars and 3 or better dancer stars. For example, i'll take 2001 over Mons any day because of the better value (mileage, dancer quality & cost) at 2001 even though the hotter dancers are gennerally at the Mons.
Dancers #1, Mileage #2 if it was a category, #3 value, #4 atmosphere... and atmosphere is misleading. As long as the club meets some minimum standard I have a high tolerance for club atmosphere. The other factors, I have specific goals.