tuscl

Face, body or personality?

Thursday, June 1, 2006 8:55 AM
I assume that given our druthers we'd all prefer a girl with a pretty face, a great body, and a pleasant personality, even though we may not agree on what exactly those are. But if you're in a club and no available girls fit that description, which are you most likely to compromise on, face, body or personality? If I ask myself that in the abstract I might say personality, but in fact when faced with the choice I think that I've usually settled for a less attractive face first. How about you? And does it make any difference where you are, eg. whether it's a high or low contact kind of place or whether the lighting is bright or dim?

14 comments

  • Golfer99
    18 years ago
    Well first the body gets your immediate attention (let's me honest). But for me how she smells and her personality are very high on the list. Facial features next. I'll give up a 9 for a 7 with a good personality and attitude. Of course I've only seen one 9 with those features lol
  • FunSeeker
    18 years ago
    ...and attitude, personal hygeine (if stinks, shitty down there), how can we have LD's?
  • chandler
    18 years ago
    I think there are plenty of pretty faces out there, usually with nice bodies. However, only a fraction of them appeal to me personally. It's an indefinable quality that crosses a lot of different types but just pushes a certain button for me. Interesting in a sexy way. A face that's interesting without being pretty is like a nice personality - okay for conversation but not up to the job for the business at hand.
  • FONDL
    18 years ago
    The problem I have with putting a pretty face first is that they're fairly rare, and when I do find one it tends to be on an overweight body because I like a round face. I'm just as happy with an interesting face as a pretty one. And by tht I mean one that's expressive with a nice smile and maybe a little mystery about it. Combine that with a flattering hairdo and makeup, put it all on a nice body, and I'm raring to go. You can have your pretty face, it's over-rated.
  • DandyDan
    18 years ago
    I probably compromise on body first, then face. I've had my fair share of unpleasant looking dancers who were fun to be with, and even had a couple OTC encounters with them. Then again, I do admit the one ex-girlfriend I wish I could have back, not that theirs a snowball's chance in hell of it happening, would qualify as such were she to dance and in a weird way, it's a fantasy come back to life.
  • FONDL
    18 years ago
    Chandler, I totally agree withyou, we tend to see what we're looking for. But I think that works to our advantage, because a lot of guys will avoid the really gorgeous girl. I don't.
  • chandler
    18 years ago
    "I think many customers have a tendency to assume that a really gorgeous girl is likely to have an attitude." As I said when the subject was raised before, men get what they expect with gorgeous girls. I think they have fewer attitude problems than average looking girls. Guys perceive average girls as having better attitudes because they're put more at ease around them. I'll take the bit of nervousness I feel with a real beauty.
  • T-Bone
    18 years ago
    1. Face 2. Sex appeal 3. Body & overall physical appearance That's it on my list. For me, personality can only take away...not add. I'm not into picking up ugly girls with a great personality.
  • FONDL
    18 years ago
    Maybe I should restate the question. I assume we all have a minimum standard in all three areas - face, body, and personality - below which we won't compromise. Assuming those minimums are met, which becomes the most important to you? When several available girls are acceptable in all three areas, which one closes the deal? BTW, as a related aside, I think many customers have a tendency to assume that a really gorgeous girl is likely to have an attitude. My most recent fave has that problem - she is drop-dead gorgeous and also has a natural pout when she's concentrating and dancing onstage. The combination gives her the appearance of having an attitude. She doesn't but a lot of guys assume she does and avoid her. I almost made that mistake the first time we met. I found out I was wrong.
  • JC2003
    18 years ago
    Personality means the most to me, not necessarily because it is the most attractive part of a stripper but because a bad personality usually translates into terrible dances and a money-hungry attitude that is a huge turnoff.
  • minnow
    18 years ago
    I'll say body, personality, and face in that order for preference. I place face last, because I honestly cannot recall seeing any dancer w. a Miss America face and a Roseanne Barr/Ms Dworkin body. For that matter, I haven't seen anyone with a killer bod/ Janet Reno face either, but I've overlooked mediocre face on killer bod while pursuing later. I became wary of pretty face sneaking up behind me, placing face on shoulder asking for dance ever since I saw a "Pregger" with a pretty face employing aforementioned technique. I don't discount personality, as I have passed on several good looking dancers w. crappy personality/vibes vs a somewhat less attractive dancer w. pleasing personality. Real answer, I suppose, is "All Of The Above".
  • AbbieNormal
    18 years ago
    In an odd way I think I have to ammend my answer. The first thing I usually note about a dancer is her face. I find that a very attractive face draws me in most quickly. I think however I'm willing to allow a lot of lattitude on the face. Unless she is out and out ugly I'm pretty forgiving. With the body, since there is a lower limit (theoretically) to how out of shape a dancer can be, I think I have less lattitude there. If they are fit and have no major flaws I'm not going to be too picky about breast size or weight (within reason). I also feel that once a dancer makes it past a certain threshold of looks it is the personality that will determine if she is a moneymaker. Sure the 10's will always make bank and a hot girl with a great personality will do better than an average girl with a great personality, but I really think that the right attitude really completes the dancer. So, this sounds almost entirely opposite to my post where I value the personality as the one thing that makes a dancer complete, am more physically attracted to girls with a great face, and can accept a wide lattitude of body types. Still I think I was accurate. If a girl has an average personality and a decent body I don't really care so much about the face. I think the way the question if phrased leads to an interesting conflict. What you will compromise on and where your widest lattitude apply are maybe not the same thing. I don't know if that makes sense or not, but to summarize most strippers are young attractive girls with good bodies to begin with. I want a girl with a good body, but among strippers that isn't too hard to find as compared to the general population, so depending what you consider settling, I'll still say face, personality, body in that order.
  • Yoda
    18 years ago
    I don't compromise in my home clubs. If I go and none of my favs are working I go someplace else. On the road I look at the face-and smile first, the body second and the personality when she sits down to hit me up for a dance. I won't spend money in a club just for the sake of spending. If I don't find a dancer that floats my boat on some level I just go back to my hotel and look at internet porn until the escort shows up....
  • AbbieNormal
    18 years ago
    If it is a LD club I'll compromise on body last, probably face first. I assume by personality you mean general conversational skills and attitude? I can do without conversation in a high mileage club if I need to, and I often don't get to look at the face during a grind.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion