tuscl

The Era Of The Porn Superstar Might Be Coming (Hah!) To A End

Sunday, May 6, 2012 4:12 PM
The Internet is a lot like the American Dream. It's this huge opportunity for anyone who wants to make something of themselves — a nearly ubiquitous platform to showcase skills and talents. Yet, it is so incredibly saturated with people trying to do exactly the same thing that the opportunity gets smaller and smaller, shrinking to the size of a pin point as more people hop online. Countless industries have seen this saturation play a role in who rises to the top, and who fizzles out as one of the millions of never-will-be stars. And porn isn't exempt from this rule. A new poll taken by XBIZ, “the adult entertainment industry's leading social network”, shows that less than half of the respondents polled (47 percent) believe there will be another mainstream porn superstar, like Jenna Jameson. Meanwhile, 27 percent say that the era of the porn superstar is over thanks to the Internet, with the other 27 percent saying that only moderate success can be achieved by porn performers. It makes sense. Think about how many people have actually made it big from YouTube, compared to the number of people who have tried. It's the exact reason why startups like TalentSplash are working to offer a platform for hopeful talent to showcase their skills. Granted, I don't watch as much porn as say, John Biggs, but I can't think of really any porn superstars outside of Jameson. The real end of the porn superstar may be due to the democratization of porn production. With cheap video cameras and editing equipment, anyone can give it a shot. It's not that porn is any less popular. It's likely much more so. But attention is now divided across thousands of demi-stars with their own websites and Twitter accounts. While the Jenna Jameson's of old might have made just a dollar or so per sale of a big studio porn movie they're featured in, today's demi-stars could rake in the same revenue by keeping most of $30 monthly site subscription fees from their hardcore (pun intended) fans. Up and comers (hah!) like Bree Olson and Sasha Grey (who left the porn biz altogether last year) seem to have achieved modest success through utilizing their Facebook and Twitter followings. But will that eventually amount to Jenna Jameson level success? The results of the XBIZ poll are a tad optimistic considering the landscape. It reminds me a bit of forthcoming iPhone rumors: “It'll support holographs!” “It will fly!” All of that is just wishful thinking, and certain industry top dogs seem to share in that hopeful optimism. CEO and co-chair of Vivid Entertainment Steven Hirsch believes that “there absolutely will be another superstar as big as Jenna. How she gets there remains to be seen but it certainly will happen.” Digital Playground co-founder Joone shares the sentiment. “I think there will always be porn superstars,” said Joone. “The fans are always looking for that next ‘it' girl. It's all about the right girl with the right company behind her to let the world know.” Even the more realistic responses are speckled with a hint of hopeful naivety. Hustler founder Larry Flynt claims that “the days of the porn superstar will return when the quality of the movies being produced are improved.” Still other big names in the adult entertainment biz see things differently. Jenna Jameson's long time co-star Ron Jeremy has a fittingly cocky response: There's so many things that I did that are almost impossible to follow. The work I've done outside of porn has dwarfed what I've done in porn. There are other people who have done good work in the same arenas, but keep in mind it gets tougher and tougher as so many medias get involved, between computers and cell phones and DVDs and pay-per-view and video-on-demand. There will not be another Jenna Jameson any time soon. It could happen, but I wouldn't stake my life on it. Kayden Kross, another award-winning adult entertainer, seems to have a grasp on reality: I think when Jenna Jameson became Jenna Jameson, no one had become Jenna Jameson yet. It was still very taboo to be a porn star and she really made that a more mainstream thing. Then there were others that came up, not to her level, but came up around that time. And now, it's just like anyone can be a porn star. It's over-saturated. It's interesting to see how different answers from industry executives and former performers are. The performers know the perils of making it big as talent, whereas the executives are likely desperate to bank on an up-and-coming star as big as a Jenna Jameson. Only time will tell if the porn industry can adapt to our almost entirely digital lifestyles. The camera industry failed, publishing is struggling big time, and both the music and movie industries are holding on to their traditional business models with cold, lifeless fingers. But the question isn't whether or not the “talent” exists. The question is whether or not we want another “it” girl. Jenna was great, but is she any better than having millions of free (and paid) titillating vids to enjoy over a bit of spit and Kleenex? [view link]

12 comments

  • Alucard
    12 years ago
    NO more Superstars I guess.
  • motorhead
    12 years ago
    I probably agree. I admit i don't watch much mainstream porn anymore. I used to know the name of several porn stars in the 80s and 90s. But I could not tell you the bug stars now. When I watch porn, it's "reality" porn with unknowns
  • JuiceBox69
    12 years ago
    I make porn "o"
  • jerikson40
    12 years ago
    Let me ask you guys something. And this is directed at the guys who like porn. Do you REALLY like the way the porn videos are produced? I mean, they have 2 minutes of buildup of some lame story line, then 25 minutes of two nekkid people doin' the deed. And it's always the same formula. BJ, then she climbs on top, then he does missionary, then a lot of really close closeups, then he shoots. Seems like just about every porno is a camera just sitting there filming two nekkid people doin' the deed. That's it. Maybe I'm weird (well, not maybe...), but wouldn't you prefer something of a story, and maybe focus more on the hot looking woman, and maybe some tease or something. I just can't get into watching an extreme closeup of some ugly dude plowing some girl. And regarding porn stars, who cares if there are superstars? BTW, I was never a Jenna Jameson fan, barely know who she is. But let's face it, porn is an incredibly huge industry all over the world, so it's not like the demand is going to drop. But I also think the the supply of really hot, really good porn stars is very, VERY small. And many of them hang around for a year or two then disappear. So there will always be the few, rare girls who are the best looking, and hang around the industry for a relatively long time, and make some big bucks. So yeah, the supply of crap porno is increasing by massive amounts, but the supply of really hot girls that lots of guys want to watch will always be tiny, which means a really hot girl has a good chance of making major bucks.
  • motorhead
    12 years ago
    I would agree with what jerickson said. It's all the same. The movies done by Playgirl available on Xfinity are probably oriented toward women but I like them better. There is more kissing and teasing before the sex. I find that exciting
  • sharkhunter
    12 years ago
    I have a porn channel I have thought about canceling because I rarely watch it. Going straight into sex isn't that interesting. Showing the guy licking the girl doesn't do anything for me. I'm assuming they put that in the porn show for the girls so I often flip channels for a few minutes if I want to watch that channel. The closeup of the guy is a turn off for me even if her pussy is in the pic. I was thinking about canceling the channel the other day when I turned it on. A girl was on a date or picnic with a guy. They were fully dressed. Or she was in a mini skirt. They were talking. I started watching. She started talking about her acrobatic abilities. She did a flip revealing no underwear. Then she said after a couple of minutes, oh my gosh, I'm not wearing underwear am I? You probably think I'm a slut don't you? Of course he said no. He liked to watch her. yeah right I'm thinking. She continues doing her stunts. Then he whips out his dick and she notices and instead of acting surprised she proceeds to suck on it. That was different and I started watching. After a few minutes I flipped the channel to see what else was on. It was the first time I turned on the channel in probably a week or two.
  • JuiceBox69
    12 years ago
    I make porno
  • DandyDan
    12 years ago
    It's already over and done with and has been for some time. Someone once said "the medium is the message", but there are so many mediums that it's hard to keep things straight most of the time. One other thing is I prefer amateurs to pros any day of the week. Not that professional porn actresses are bad, but I'd rather see some girl I've not seen before.
  • georgmicrodong
    12 years ago
    Most of the porn I watch nowadays is (or reasonably realistically appears to be) homemade. Formulaic porn, as jerikson pointed out, doesn't really do much for me any more, unless it's well done BDSM stuff, of which there is little.
  • SuperDude
    12 years ago
    Saw a cable movie last night "After Porn," with Seka, Asia Carrera and other retirees. Sad.
  • Clubber
    12 years ago
    I concur with jerikson40. The tease is an important part. Sort of the foreplay of porn. Not that many men worry about foreplay, but they should!
  • spoonie
    12 years ago
    I was in a hotel recently and came across this parody of the Rocky Horror Picture Show - [view link] - It actually watched the whole thing without fast forwarding. Possibly a first for me. I thought the acting was better than some "mainstream" movies I've seen.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion