Rate the Hottie No.1

Well, let's start with the obvious that these are professional photographs (Kudos to The Furnace for this . . . but I actually would like to see some shots from the dancers in the club as well). OK. Long brown hair, check; nice round ass, check; rack . . . hmmm, probably enhanced but if so, it was well done; good figure, nice smile.

My rating: 7

Jackson,

We're of the same mindset. Attractive but not ideal. A solid 7. Hair color a negative. Prefer blondes. Nice boobs but you're right. Probably fake so lost a point.

Jackson & Mo'Head,

Agree with you both, solid 7....If real boobs, it'd be 8....and extra credit for being a Brunette....

Solid 7.5, but Ass slightly bigger than I prefer.

6-7, because of her face and figure. From the shots shown, she doesn't seem quite proportional, and her face just doesn't appeal to me. Her eyes seem too close together and her cheekbones seem in the low side.

Bear in mind with these ratings that I would likely rate about a 4 on the ladies' scale. :)

Just pointing out that I'm admitting my own egotistical opinion here.

Che:

I agree that the info would be a downshifter for me as well if I included personality in my rating system. However, I tend to rate a dancer long before I ever (if I ever) talk to her. So, she'd probably get a drink and maybe a dancer out of me, depending on what the other dancers were like.

Yeah, somewhere between an 7 and an 8. I wouldn't hang around the club turning other girls down while waiting for her to stop by, but I wouldn't turn her down unless I saw something better.

I have two more ready to be posted, but will wait a while to give more posters a chance to rate #1. I'll try to find a Blonde for Motorhead :-)

I'll give her a 7, but it's hard to tell from those photos. Need bigger pictures and less clothing. Could be a 6.

Just for Ermita (and anyone else wanting bigger pictures)

thefurnacebham.com

thefurnacebham.com

thefurnacebham.com

thefurnacebham.com

As to skin . . . can't help you there . . . I am at the mercy of the webmaster at The Furnace

I would say about a 6.5. Nothing spectacular to elevate her past that.

7.5, I might it up some more to an 8 if she has nice tits and nipples which I can't see in these pics. I have to go with what I see.

No more than a 7.

Thanks Jackson, I'll go with solid 7.

On my scale, the prettiest girls I normally see at the clubs are 8. Every now and then I'll see a 9. 10 is perfection, and only exists until I get close enough to see the flaws.

I'm with maddog: a solid 7, willing to go 8 if all natural.

Overall good looking. Good face, but not exceptional. Ass is kind of big for my tastes. Rist tat in larger pics is a worring sign. Minus additional pts depending on ink.

Bigger pics were difinitely a help. Pics look modified, so she may not be as large as shown.

I will have to rate her no less than 7. She may rate an 8 if I were to see her on stage with just bikini bottoms on.

Overall she is beautiful. Definitely in the top 1/3 of my scale.

I would put her as a solid 7-7.5 with possibility to raise or lower the number once I saw her in a bikini. Raise it if her body looks even better than what I see and lower if she had additional tats. The wrist tat doesn't bother me. I am not looking at her hands anyway unless they are around my dick! lol.

Below the neck she is excellent,depending on how the breasts look uncovered and whether she has any ugly tats. Her face, although pretty, seems a little odd in the proportions of the features.

But I would definitely take her to the back if the attitude was right.

5.0

Too hefty, doesn't appear co-ordinated. And I like them petite. Wouldn't even try her, although I would watch her dance onstage. Not terribly unattractive but not my fantasy girl.

I liked the bigger photos. But y'all must have better eyes than I do. I've looked several times and still don't see the wrist tattoo.

Poor eyesight? Too much masturbation or a side effect from the Viagara?

Mo'Head, lol....the last pic shows it best - a relatively small one on the inside of her left wrist....

Are those just big earrings or is she stretching the holes...

She reminds me too much of my niece to be attractive to me. Can't even rate her.

motor,

Just enlarge the picture when displayed. Easily visible.

Butter face. Fat ass. Chunky thighs. No sense of style (see hair, nail polish, ugly shoes)

Rates very low on my scale; maybe 3-4.

But............

If she's an enthusiastic extras girl willing to let me dip my wick in her honeypot she rockets up my scale!

I would agree that she is a 7 without more information like if she if toned and not cottage cheese, seeing her with less on. The comments posted show that there are wildly varying tastes. I once worked with a guy who only liked girls with skinny hips. I find that look makes me feel like the girls are under age. I was in a club were tatted and pierced girls would rake in the tips. I was afraid I would need a tetnus shot if I got a dance. I also steer away from out of proportion boob jobs. I do not mind them If I cannot tell they have had work with out a hands on inspection. I would let her sit down for further scientific hands on research.

Interesting that most rate her higher without MAJOR required knowledge. I tend to rate lower without full knowledge. Also, a rating should be on looks alone from a picture

7 is a good starting point. I like the tiny waist, but if the tight dress is helping with tone, the number could drop when the dress drops - however, fun personality and it could recover - might even get to an 8 then.

Put me in the category of one who prefers a little meat on the bone. I like the how her legs and butt look. That's why this is all so subjective. What some of us think is a 7-8 others think is a 4-5. The overall consensus so far seems to be more towards 7 than towards 4, but in the long run this is just a fun social experiment.

I'd give her a 7.

I think in person at first sight she'd be about a 6 and possible to slide up to 8 depending on how strong the ol' beer goggles become.

7 as far as I can see. I'd definitely fuck it.

"It"? I fully realize that we're objectifying women here, but damn, that comment takes it to a new level.

"I think in person at first sight she'd be about a 6 and possible to slide up to 8 depending on how strong the ol' beer goggles become"

LOL! Oh, how true!

Lol, I'm in asshole mode today gmd.

at best 6 foe me. just not my type

I would giver her a 6.

One of the most solid 6's I've ever seen. Oh, I didn't notice the hair out of place...make that a five.

No more than a 6, decent looking body from what is shown, but definatley a brown bagger.

I will go 7. She would be a very attractive girl in most crowds. But there is much room for improvement.

Her looks are average at best. I find the tight dress to be the most attractive thing about her but she's too big for me. Her shoulders are wide and her neck is long; there's something disproportionate about her that bothers me.

I'd give her a 4.5.

I think she is an attractive girl, but the pics should be a bit bigger to better judge. I still give her an 8..